Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Online gambling is a bad idea. (Score 1) 206

by Nevyn (#31060932) Attached to: Push To End Online Gambling Ban Gains Steam

"So, are you trying to ban etrade.com and "flipping houses"? Or is risk taking in general ok, and you just want to impose your peculiar morality about playing cards on others?"

They are not the same, Equities are investments, I don't know of any gambling site that pays dividends, do you?

Talk to the people who bought Bank of America stock at $40+. See if they think there is any "gambling" (or more commonly called risk in this context) in equities. Might want to ask them how their wonderful dividends are doing too.

Comment: Re:Yes, Redhat (Score 1) 354

by Nevyn (#31025976) Attached to: Android and the Linux Kernel Community

"Redhat Enterprise Linux 5" is essentially a massive kernel fork at 2.6.18.

Backporting a lot of patches is not the definition of fork, for any sane person. Esp. when that same group of people are actively working upstream on the latest releases.

Depending on who you ask, RHEL can be more risky than mainline.

Sure, if you ask stupid people questions they can often give you stupid answers. But I've yet to see anyone intelligent run a vanilla upstream kernel in a production environment. Google are probably the closest, and they basically have a mini-RHEL kernel team that they employ ... I guess wasting huge amounts of money to do that isn't a big deal when you are Google.

I've definitely had RHEL panics take down production, only to later discover linux kernel bugs that had been fixed in mainline for a while, but that redhat hadn't backported to their ancient linux fork

Shocker, software having bugs. But here's a hint, if we play chess 30 times and you win 1 match ... that doesn't mean we are both winners, "depending on who you ask". Maybe you really are trying to say that RHEL vs. vanilla are going to have roughly the same number of bugs (and the same time to get them fixed) ... but you'd be a pretty small minority at that point.

Comment: Re:I missed the memo about IBM (Score 1) 131

by Nevyn (#30688478) Attached to: Is Getting Acquired Good For FOSS Projects?

And how is this different from SUN? Oh, wait, SUNs OS is open-source, and, because the platform is open, it is easy enough to put Linux on.

Except Solaris isn't the same as OpenSolaris, in fact one of the biggest complaints I see from the few people still running Solaris is that they still can't get access to the source ... just to see wtf is going on. And OpenSolaris only happened as a last ditch effort before Solaris died to Linux, being forced to do something before you die because you didn't is hardly "leading".

NFS, NIS, Solaris, JAVA, OpenOffice, VirtualBox, MySQL

NFS and NIS can only be classed as open source projects if you are delusional. Yes, they dumped some code to try and make a de-facto std. ... but they were never an upstream. Solaris being open source is a lie. Java only because open source because Red Hat+IBM+etc. were going to create a real open source version, if they didn't. Open Office, you can have (although again, they were pretty much forced to open source it ... and there is no real community, because Sun are clueless about open source). MySQL was bought, complete with community (and only a significant part of Sun if you take their inflated price at face value). I know nothing about Virtual box, so maybe you can have that ... for what it's worth.

Comment: Re:Should be (Score 1) 572

by Nevyn (#30477150) Attached to: Angry AT&T Customers May Disrupt Service

Welcome to reality. The amount of electricity to your house is not limited

Not true, even ignoring the physical problems there's a main breaker (which you can't play with without the electric companies approval) which has a limit. But I've also never seen the electric company advertise "unlimited" electricity.

And I think network usage has to go the same way. The reason that's scary to a lot of people is because most "per-megabyte" rates are way, way too high.

That is a worry ... but the biggest problem is still "we sold you unlimited, but have now realized we can't give it to you".

Comment: Re:You can't say NO (Score 2, Insightful) 410

by Nevyn (#30371350) Attached to: Saying No To Promotions Away From Tech?

The thing is the only thing overseas sub-contracting has to offer are lower costs. So it makes sense that the overseas companies will "optimize" everything for cost, this implies the cheapest labour you can get. This probably works "acceptably" for a level 1 call centre, not so much for knowledge workers.

By the same token, I've never seen a small .us contracting company primarily optimize for cost (they may exist, and I just haven't worked with/for them).

God grant me the senility to accept the things I cannot change, The frustration to try to change things I cannot affect, and the wisdom to tell the difference.

Working...