Slashdot Log In
ATM For Anonymous Online Payments
Posted by
simoniker
on Mon Jul 21, 2003 04:32 PM
from the hopefully-no-camera-mounted-in-atm dept.
from the hopefully-no-camera-mounted-in-atm dept.
prichardson writes "The New York Times has an article about a way to anonymously transfer cash online (NYT registration required)." The inventor, Carl Amos, believes the target market for his newly-patented 'Aunty IM' ATM machine "..might be teenagers.. [who] do not usually have their own credit cards, they usually have cash and are more than willing to spend it to download music or games", as well as "those who were worried about identity theft on the Internet, or who simply wanted the privacy it provided."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
ATM For Anonymous Online Payments
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 254 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
google linkage (Score:4, Informative)
Yay (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.beryllium.ca/)
Power to the people! Vivé la transaction!
Perfect. (Score:5, Interesting)
How can I pay you? (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~svoboda)
a credit card or Paypal at someone's web site...how could this be
done from an ATM? (No, I'm not gonna try to punch in the recipient's
URL!)
That's a rather critical detail not mentioned in the article.
Re:How can I pay you? (Score:5, Interesting)
. You could then use that number like any other card (visa/mastercard/etc). Jsut a thought. The article didn't really specify.
Re:How can I pay you? (Score:5, Informative)
(http://twinkieinjapan.com/ | Last Journal: Friday March 05 2004, @02:58PM)
Doesn't American Express have something like this? It's called Private Payments [americanexpress.com]. It gives you a unique number that's lets you obscure your identity.
Now there's probably a market for teenagers and such. But I'm thinking pre-paid cards will take care of that...
Money Launderer's dream (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://nedwolf.com/ | Last Journal: Friday September 30 2005, @01:10PM)
Re:Money Launderer's dream (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://nedwolf.com/ | Last Journal: Friday September 30 2005, @01:10PM)
Now typically you would have records of credit card transactions, that could be traced back to the card's owner. With this system, you would have records of transactions that cannot be traced to anyone.
You could then simply pump a buttload of cash into the system and report legitimate profits.
Too Much Freedom? (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://www.starlight-systems.com/)
Arguments?
Re:Too Much Freedom? (Score:5, Insightful)
How about the fact that it's no different from cash?
Re:Too Much Freedom? (Score:5, Interesting)
I have read that organized crime transfers money from country to country by wiring small amounts (under the amount that must be reported) constantly. Even though there is a paper trail of sorts, it is very hard to sort through. But again, most of the people who wire money are not organized criminals. Should we stop this practice because some of the people are?
Means of moving illegal money secretively already exist. I think the idea with this system is it could allow people to make online purchases, even if they are from an area of the world that does not have the financial systems and identification systems that we take for granted in the West. I am inclined to think the net effect of this would be good. Many people do not have any sort of identification or formal bank account (as required for a service like paypal, which is apparently unavailable in much of the world), but if they could get to a kiosk with some cash, they might be able to order something - provided someone was willing to ship it to them. This could be a big improvement in the lives of many people. It could also help economic growth, facilitating transactions at greater distances and of greater complexity than was possible before.
Should we not build any infrastructure because criminals could use it? Criminals can drive on the roads, too, but that does not mean we stop building them. We police them. This system would have to be policed.
The market (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Sunday November 11, @09:31AM)
Whoever steps in to fill that gap make a friggin mint. The frontrunner seems to be CitiBank's C2It, though I know nothing of such services.
Great!! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.thebark.com/)
What can it do? (Score:3, Insightful)
Some more details on capability would be cool. Google here I come.
Going to need alot of work (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://newlibertarian.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Monday July 18 2005, @02:23PM)
about quick and easy anonymous money transfer...
Re:Going to need alot of work (Score:4, Insightful)
it's nice but this, I fear, will go the way of big hair and mullets... unless you live in the south.
Re:Going to need alot of work (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.dacels.info/ | Last Journal: Monday January 05 2004, @10:45AM)
Yes, and since you have the anonymous purchase card you don't have to register the gun or go through the other processes. "Here's my anonymous cash card!" "Right, here's your pistol and ammo." You do know that you have to register to buy a gun, right? You also know you can buy a gun with cash, right?
Anybody who accepts these cards will accept cash, and you have no benefit over them. For some reason I doubt that most private gun sellers will offer support for these cards.
Actually, (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Thursday May 19 2005, @12:14PM)
I'd like a gun and ammo
Here you go. That'll be $342.22
Here's my anonymous cash card!
Right, here's your pistol and ammo.
Oh - I won't be needing a bag...
What is happening to the English language? (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Saturday September 29, @02:08PM)
This is old hat in Japan (Score:5, Informative)
(http://tokyojim.com/)
You just key in the bank name and account number to transfer to, insert the cash, and it's on its way. The ATM will even make change for you.
Re:This is old hat in Japan (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://localhost/)
Funny (Score:5, Insightful)
Why to I find this sentence funny ?
So, finally banking can be anonymous (yeah right, in your wildest dreams [whitehouse.gov], but we still need to register with NYT?
No wait, you can't do do banking with a hotmail account
Is there an identity verification system? (Score:4, Insightful)
Already been done. (Score:3, Informative)
They also made into the system a way of determining real-time if any "bill" was being used more than once.
Wow. Anonymous atm. It's a real shocker if it hasnt already be theorized up to the top.
boring.
Good Luck (Score:2)
The way they crack down on the gambling industry, you can bet they'd scream "terrorism" and "drugs" and all the other things they have wars on.
Not to mention the Tax Evasion uses, and we all know that taxes are #1 when it comes to the governments concern.
Been Done..... (Score:1, Interesting)
sounds good (Score:3, Insightful)
Amazed no one has mentioned ... (Score:2)
Useless invention (Score:4, Offtopic)
This is not hearsay or speculation, I work in the financial services industry, and I can tell you that the financial laws are going the other way - less anonymity and higher identification requirements for money wires.
In other words, this guy will have to keep transactions down a ridiculously low upper limit to avoid ID requirements.
I have seen people wiring money for very fraudulent puposes, so I don't really share people's feelings that wiring money should be anonymous.
As for this guy's plans to use the technolgy abroad, he should take into consideration that the USA is requiring other countries to follow USA-like laws and he might have the same issue abroad.
Again, this is from first-hand experience, not hearsay.
Very useful if properly implemented (Score:2, Interesting)
The breakdown of user demographics: (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Friday February 17 2006, @06:51PM)
15% teenagers buying from ebay.
60% preteens buying drugs and pr0n.
15% illegal transfers of hijacked subnets.
Thank you tinfoil hat freaks. You have made the world safer for us all.
As a teenager, I can definitely see a use for this (Score:2, Interesting)
(http://www.zdomain.com/psyonic)
Somethings not right... (Score:3, Interesting)
Sure, you don't have the logs of cash coming out of your account (credit, savings, etc), but there is cash being sent somewhere, and that somewhere has to be well-defined for the cash to get there.
Also, the product, assuming something is bought, has to go somewhere, again a well-defined location, even if it is a mail-drop.
AFAIK, all wired money transactions are logged in some fashion, and for this to be approved by the government, it would have to be as well. I still don't see how super-beneficial this gimmick might be.
disposable credit card numbers (Score:5, Interesting)
Something like that must be done at a global level (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday April 12 2005, @11:12PM)
Something that enables to pay directly with cash, no risks involved (like the fear of many of using their credit card number online) and really for everyone (well, with the cash and with that kind of ATMs near :) could do a real boom for online payments (at least, for the things that don't have a phisical good attached, like program registrations, online donations, domain buying and things like that).
Visa Electron and friends (Score:1)
A Visa Electron debit card (and probably some others, I don't know) is currently the best solution for those who just can't get a credit card. It's basically a credit card that takes the money directly from its owner's bank account (if there's anything to take :). This requires a direct connection between the bank and the seller though, so most smaller sites don't support it.
Easily Bypassing NYT 'Registration Required' (Score:5, Informative)
(http://fsg.botservice.net/)
2. Go to URL bar, replace "www" with "archive" in the URL, leaving the rest alone, and hit ENTER
3. The system will bounce you around a few erroneous URLs, before returning you to the homepage
4. All NYT links will now work without registration, thanks to a special cookie set by the bouncing process
David Chaum is the guy we should be watching (Score:2)
No way in Hell (Score:2, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday January 08 2007, @07:53PM)
There's so much more to this but the only way this idea would make it is for it to not be anon but that defeats the purpose right?
Many problems this solves are *already* solved... (Score:1, Interesting)
These payment systems are worldwide, do not suffer the chargeback problem, and seem to be fine with gambling and adult sites. They are also not linked to any particular national currency so should appeal to more libertarian among us.
Example: Wanna gamble now [thegoldcasino.com] with them?
Suuuuuuure... (Score:2, Interesting)
(http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/)
But it's primary use will be for drug dealers to launder money. For married men(and women) to pay for hookers and strippers. For people to turn petty cash into petty lap dance...
Big market for those things tho
where's the anonymity? (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/)
A search on the article itself does NOT have the word "anonymous" anywhere in it.
So... given that the article is very short on implementation details, how does one come to the conclusion there is anything anonymous about it? Because no credit card is involved? Not saying it isn't... but it just seems there's a big jump to conclusions.. unless I'm blind.
An easy way to implement this would be... (Score:2)
(http://www.kibbee.ca/)
It's a Trap (Score:1)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Two words... (Score:2)
(or money launderers)
[or hot items]
nothing to do with MONEY and ONLINE are anonymous (Score:1, Insightful)
I like it (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Thursday December 08 2005, @04:33PM)
Well... I like the idea of anonymous cash transfers.
It's a step in the right direction. (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Thursday August 12 2004, @10:56PM)
As for all of the posts about drug dealers, money launderers, adulterers, and terrorists, you're right, those people would use an anonymous method of payment/transfer if it were easily/readily available, but so would political disidents (are they terrorists if they dissagree with you?), persons worried about identity theft, and people like me, who simply resent the governments attempts to count every roll of toilet paper I buy and every book or magazine that I read.
illegal (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.juniperforum.com/)
It's against the law. The feds say that all ATM transactions must have positive ID of the cardholder (PIN number, driver's license swipe, etc) As far as electronic money transfers go, there has to be some positive identification on the person sending the money, but curiously from what I can find, not on the person receiving it.
Nice idea, just not legal here in the US.
The Reality of Assassination Politics (Score:1)
Does anyone remember Assassination Politics by Jim Bell?
Read more [jya.com]
less here than meets the eye (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.ecis.com/~alizard)
The potential profits are too low for the risks involved. Also, there are already ATMs that have been retrofitted to accept cash for the purpose of paying bills for defined (telco, utility) customers. Ever see one?
There are cheaper and more cost-effective ways to do this than via ATM, I filed a provisional patent app for one years ago.
teens today (Score:1)
NYT Registration gets us AGAIN! (Score:3, Funny)
You mean I actually have to register with the NYT to anonymously transfer cash online?!
WHEN. WILL. IT. STOP?!
Try CashX (www.cashx.com) (Score:2, Informative)
Be warned, however--if you give a spoofed physical address, you may likely have problems ordering delivered goods to your real physical address (not to mention that such orders obviously compromise your anonymity).
Also, since it is a Visa card, it is subject to any restrictions Visa might adopt (for gambling sites, for example, although I don't know that they do have such restrictions).
What about paypal.com? (Score:1)
Old news in Belgium (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Monday October 01, @08:54AM)
The big question... (Score:1)
(http://oskar.fasth.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday December 08 2001, @02:32PM)
Make This a Req. For Political Contributions (Score:1)
Re:ATM machine?! (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:This looks like a good way to fund terrorists (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This looks like a good way to fund terrorists (Score:5, Informative)
It's not even that simple, nor is the threshold that high. There are several levels of reporting requirements and the lowest explicit thresholds are at about $3000 for most states.
Additionally, funds transfers companies are burdened with detecting "suspicious" transactions, and you have to report those no matter what the amounts are.
I am not going to spell out how to do this, just suffice it to say that the methods are very sophisticated.
This guy ain't implementing his invention in the USA (and the non-triangle of terror countries) until he gets some heavy-duty legal compliance checking stuff into his system. The age of anonymous funds transfers is over.
Re:Hrmmmm, terrorist concerns? (Score:2)
And besides, the interstate highway system could be used by terrorists to quickly move people and supplies around. Should we shut down highways because of this use?
Re:Potential users... (Score:2)
(http://www.allaboutgames.co.uk/ | Last Journal: Friday December 16 2005, @08:32PM)
Re:Hrmmmm, terrorist concerns? (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Thursday May 19 2005, @12:14PM)
Every slashdot discussion will eventually mention terrorism.
Re:Hrmmmm, terrorist concerns? (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.neverending.org/~ftobin/)
This is an extremely poor argument. Your argument would apply the same if we did not have privacy laws, and all of a sudden people proposed having privacy. Using the same logic, because privacy laws helps the boogey-man terrorist immensely, we shouldn't implement them.