Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Walk-By DNA Testing

Posted by Hemos on Mon Jul 10, 2000 07:20 AM
from the scary-stuff dept.
Scott_Marks writes "The New York Times today has an article on a newly-patented device which may make it practical to perform DNA testing (or drug testing, or explosives testing) on anyone walking underneath. This "portal" sucks up some of the millions of skin flakes each of us sheds each day and whips them into your choice of privacy-invading analysis equipment "for detecting the presence of molecules of interest"."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Walk-by DNA Testing | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 153 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3
  • Sniffing chamber by Kaa (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @03:30AM
  • Re:Fight the Future by Zurk (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:31AM
  • Couple of points by Kaa (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @03:34AM
  • not the same thing by cara (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:08AM
  • Re:Get used to it... by Com2Kid (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:16AM
  • Re:So what? What's the problem? by nomadlogic (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:16AM
  • Re:Couple of points by jfortier (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:23AM
  • Re:Spam DNA! by no-s (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:24AM
  • Re:Something you can do (in U.S.) to protect liber by jfortier (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:34AM
  • Possible new products by ShamballaJones (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:35AM
  • Re:Easy solution - ban DNA cross referencing by jafac (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:50AM
  • ideology testing; by jafac (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:53AM
  • Re:Gattaca by ballestra (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:34AM
  • I can't wait! by Tom7 (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @03:36AM
  • Re:Spam DNA! by sqlrob (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:40AM
  • Re:Easy solution - ban DNA cross referencing by Dust31 (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:42AM
  • Re:Hmmmm. . . by MKalus (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:43AM
  • Re:Easy solution - ban DNA cross referencing by Claudius (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @03:44AM
  • Re:Rebel without a clue = you by Zurk (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:45AM
  • Re:Will it work by carlos_benj (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @03:46AM
  • Perhaps we already are by KlomDark (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:55AM
  • Re:Couple Points about a Couple of points by jafac (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @08:58AM
  • um hang on a sec by SEAL (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @09:01AM
  • Think of it... by Wog (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:30AM
  • Re:Rebel without a clue = you by Defiler (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @09:10AM
  • Uh oh. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:35AM
  • Re:Will it work by Defiler (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @09:36AM
  • Re:Fight the Future by kannen (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @09:39AM
  • Cool a walk through dandruff remover by MrChris2 (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:35AM
  • Re:Couple of points by Defiler (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @09:39AM
  • Hmmmm. . . (Score:3)

    by Spasemunki (63473) <spasemunki.gmail@com> on Monday July 10 2000, @02:38AM (#946458) Homepage
    If you notice, the bit about DNA is just a throw-away at the bottom of the article. The main purpose of this is to scan for explosives residue, something that we already have a way to do very quickly and cheaply (I should know- happens to me every time I got through the airport). It is certainly extensable to taking DNA samples, but until there are some big breakthroughs in fast, cheap DNA sequencing, and the solve the problem of making sure they get the right DNA, this particular device isn't going to be turning you over to the GATTACA police just yet.

    "Sweet creeping zombie Jesus!"
  • Re:DNA testing nearly impossible with this inventi by Defiler (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @09:57AM
  • Will it work by mjgday (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @02:38AM
  • Re:..that and refuse drug tests by aardvarkjoe (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @10:21AM
  • For a link that works... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:39AM
  • Gattaca by crow (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @02:40AM
  • You smell... by don_carnage (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:55AM
  • Hey they patended a vacuum cleaner. by gnalle (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:56AM
  • Re:Hmmmm. . . by Spasemunki (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @03:56AM
  • hmpt by Mr804 (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:58AM
  • hey Tom :) by fialar (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:01AM
  • well that's it (Score:3)

    by happystink (204158) on Monday July 10 2000, @04:05AM (#946469)
    Time to get rid of my skin again!
  • Re:Will it work by Claudius (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:05AM
  • Priate fertility clinics (is this the future?) by gnalle (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:06AM
  • What I'm afraid of by CMU_Nort (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:11AM
  • Re:Couple of points by jfortier (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @10:35AM
  • Re:Spam DNA! by tartha (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @10:39AM
  • Errr... by Aos (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @11:14AM
  • Re:Guilty before proven innocent? by dynamitehack (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @11:29AM
  • Fatal flaw: by fishexe (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @11:49AM
  • Re:Will it work by restless_ne'erdowell (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @01:23PM
  • Take it farther! by Silicon_Prophet (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @01:25PM
  • Re:Rebel without a clue = you by blane.bramble (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:15AM
  • Re:Will it work by Darkstorm (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:21AM
  • Re:Spam DNA! by Spasemunki (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @04:25AM
  • Re:Uh oh. by gizmoNaut (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:30AM
  • Hrm by jbarnett (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @04:32AM
  • Couple Points about a Couple of points by Spasemunki (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @04:34AM
  • by Pfhreakaz0id (82141) on Monday July 10 2000, @04:36AM (#946486)

    Not that these are actually in use yet, but I can see it someday if we keep going down this path. It seems like we in the U.S. keep giving up more and more of our personal liberties to have a sense of "safety." Americans are whipped into frenzy by the focus of local TV news on sensationalistic crime reporting. Americans believe they are under seige from gun-toting, crack-smoking gangbangers.

    There is a real, everyday, easy to do, practical thing you can do: Remind everyone you know that violent crime is at a twenty-year low in this country. Most of you have probably heard this, but you'd be surprised at how often it shocks people you meet. Here's a CNN.com article [cnn.com] to link to. (I'm sure there are better ones, but I can't find 'em right now. Or point 'em to the FBI's Universal Crime Reports [fbi.gov]. Really. Do it.
    ---
  • Re:Discrimination by Silicon_Prophet (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @01:39PM
  • Re:Guilty before proven innocent? by wannabe (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:30PM
  • If you can't beat 'em... over load them by .havoc (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:32PM
  • Re:Guilty before proven innocent? by epukinsk (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:49PM
  • Walk-through drug testing by TheGeek (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:57PM
  • Re:False Results -- Cocaine on banknotes by alexgp (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @07:48PM
  • Re:Errr... by Pfhreakaz0id (Score:2) Tuesday July 11 2000, @02:50AM
  • Potential for abuse, you say? by Chops (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:37AM
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 10 2000, @04:38AM (#946495)
    (just a lazy man, not a Coward) It's a drip-by-drip process. Americans are, through inattention and carelessness, creating a hellish future, from our current standards. The Drug War is the opening crack for the removal of out civil liberties. And we are doing it to ourselves. Not the Guvmint. Our children submit to testing and searches in schools; and as they become adults they will accept even more restrictions in the name of "safety". The communist menace was the pretext in the last half of the 20th, and drugs and "terrorism" are the excuses of the new century. The interesting thing is, there are no incidents of terrorism in the US to justify the latter. It's all man-on-horseback populism. We are giving up our freedom from search and seizure based on a *perception* of danger, in a time when we are the safest, richest, and best fed people that have ever lived, bar none. It's astounding to me, to realize that the most freakishly fearful people I know are in the safest Burbclaves around Chicago. Oh, and the Drug War... don't seem to recall a country call Drugs. Who is the enemy? Why, it's... US! We've schizophrenically declared war on ourselves, because we ran out of real enemies for all those warriors to fight. South and Central America is turning into a cartelocracy, a war zone, because half of our population likes various narcotics and the other half wants to kill or imprison the other half. Based on non-existent evidence, we have declared the drugs more dangerous than cars, cigarettes, or war. Contrary conclusions are discarded without examination. And because of this insanity, we are going to have cameras everywhere, DNA scanners, uberdatabases, drug testing on demand, and abuse, abuse, abuse. It will happen slowly, too slowly for those not watching to notice. Why am I so negative? Because I've been watching for over 30 years, and it is happening, and I don't see anything stopping it. I can't get a job without chemical testing. You can bet DNA testing will be required someday to weed out insurance risks. Police can stop vehicles at random to find drug offenders. It will only get more intrusive. If you are fighting a war, then you have to fight it all out, no? Why compromise? Especially if you can't possibly win. The Forever War... Even if, optimistically, the cross reffing of DNA db's to other db's is banned, corporate entities will use legal tricks to escape prosecution. They are extranational now, anyway. And the coming admin will be even more disposed to give them what the want, legally (as hard as that may seem) than the current one. Government? Dudes and dudettes, that's not the big problem! Corporations using DNA testing (not to mention morals testing, drug testing, hell, ideology testing) can take away your ability to *work*. Well, not all of them, but enough to make a big problem. That is far away more frightening. Example: a bank could refuse to give you loans based on your projected longevity or susceptiblity to diseases. No house, no car. This ain't a joke. We may not be able to stop it, but we can observe and chronicle it; I'm beginning to think that's all we can do. In the meantime, just live your lives, smile, be happy, and never forget to watch what's happening and comment about it.
  • In most areas in the US, it is perfectly legal for the police to stop and check every driver on the road, as long as they check EVERY driver who comes to the checkpoint. It sucks, but the courts have upheld it.
    They have, because while you might not like passing through a roadblock that stops everyone on New Years Eve, it beats the alternative: Police stopping 1)Only every black person that comes through or 2)Every person that looks suspicious (see above, add "poor people", "people with facial hair", "foreigners", and "people under 30")
    Random stops on everyone that comes through are a pain. But it sure beats being targeted by security forces because of the color of your skin or the bad rap your belief system gets. I would much rather see every single person that goes through an airport get a DNA or chemical scan than have them target "profiles". The volume of data and the scrutiny involved in tagging that many people is in itself a gaurantee of some privacy (ways to protect privacy: 1) be alone 2) be in a whacking big crowd), whereas only targeting "profiled" and marginalized groups risks everyone's rights (the hangman's story phenomena: eventually, your group is next.)



    "Sweet creeping zombie Jesus!"
  • Re:Will it work by Spasemunki (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @04:45AM
  • Re:Couple Points about a Couple of points by Kaa (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @04:47AM
  • Get used to it... by glowingspleen (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:48AM
  • So what? What's the problem? by Kombat (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:35AM
  • even better by ArchieBunker (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @04:55AM
  • Re:Are you pure? by Peter Dyck (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:35AM
  • Not All Bad by BWing (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:01AM
  • Once shed... by dwinx (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:37AM
  • Re:What about legally taken drugs? by carlos_benj (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @05:03AM
  • Re:Hmmmm. . . by / (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @05:43AM
  • Re:Rebel without a clue = you by nstrug (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @05:05AM
  • fun with False Results by scruffyMark (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:44AM
  • DNA testing nearly impossible with this invention by CowbertPrime (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:46AM
  • Re:So what? What's the problem? by Peter Dyck (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:46AM
  • Re:Will it work by dingbat_hp (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:50AM
  • Only slightly relevant factoid by scruffyMark (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:52AM
  • Re:Something you can do (in U.S.) to protect liber by styopa (Score:1) Tuesday July 11 2000, @07:17AM
  • Re:Uh oh. by noitalever (Score:1) Tuesday July 11 2000, @08:17AM
  • Re:Gattaca by crow (Score:1) Tuesday July 11 2000, @10:15AM
  • Re:Will it work by techwatcher (Score:1) Wednesday July 12 2000, @07:38AM
  • Re:DNA testing nearly impossible with this inventi by CowbertPrime (Score:1) Wednesday July 12 2000, @09:50AM
  • Re:Rebel without a clue = you by andyt (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:06AM
  • by xtal (49134) on Monday July 10 2000, @05:08AM (#946519) Homepage

    Something else you can do is to absolutely, 100%, without exception, refuse any employment drug testing on moral grounds. Did you know that the Canadian counterparts of many US corporations DO NOT require pre-employment drug testing because people are much less likely to accept it here?

    No job is worth my liberty. Mind you, I'm skilled enough so that finding employment isn't hard, even if I'm picky, and I've told people no before. You'd be suprised how many people haven't even thought about the implications of such testing. Ask WHY! It's like when a cop asks you if he can look in your trunk. Ask him if you can look in his. This usually gets a most suprised look - although, mind you, cops up here don't draw weapons as part of standard operating procedure, either - there's forms to fill out if the RCMP even unholster their weapon.

    The reason to do this is that if you don't refuse HORRIBLY intrusive testing (Would you ask a stranger off the street to piss in a cup for you?) then the wonderful DNA test happens next. The tools to give the state supreme power over a ignorant populace are happening, and when everybody wakes up, you won't have any way to fight back.

    An old history professor of mine used to have a quote in BIG letters above the blackboard: "Power: It's ain't for the givin', it's for the takin'" (unknown). Words to live by.

  • Moore's law predicts this by peter303 (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:09AM
  • Re:..that and refuse drug tests by Pfhreakaz0id (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @05:11AM
  • Re:Guilty before proven innocent? by / (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @05:14AM
  • Re:Rebel without a clue = you by Steve B (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:20AM
  • Ouch, scary by scruffyMark (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:55AM
  • Clone Supermodels? by Polymon (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:21AM
  • Re:Fight the Future by CaseStudy (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:56AM
  • Are you pure? by nagora (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:22AM
  • Honestly, scanning your identity this way is about the last thing you should be worried about. The main goal of testers like these is to be able to scan people rapidly, like the metal detectors at airports. They want to be able to tell if someone is trying to smuggle bombs or drugs onto an airplane. That means that you need to know the answer from your test now, not in an hour or two when the guy's already had a chance to pass his stuff to some third party.

    At the present, and for the forseeable future, it's just not possible to make a DNA-based individual ID in anything like real time. Even in the lab with nearly ideal samples doing that kind of thing takes time, and a lot of that is not something that can be easily reduced; certain chemical and physical reactions take time and can't be sped up. That puts a pretty strong damper on using this as a DNA vacum to violate people's rights.

    OTOH, you can bet that the war against drugs and the war against terrorism will be used as excuses. Pretty soon you won't be able to get on a plane without being subjected to a battery of tests to make sure that you're not trying to put anything illegal onto the plane. Oops, you're a mining engineer who uses explosives at work? Prepare to be hassled every time you try to fly. Your pot smoking brother came over to visit? Prepare to be stopped and have your luggage examined. In the long term those kinds of minor erosions of personal protection are a much more dangerous threat to privacy than some hypothetical DNA screening.

  • Re:Aaaaah! by Ralph Wiggam (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:05AM
  • Re:Discrimination by KahunaBurger (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @06:06AM
  • Electronic senses by HiThere (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:19AM
  • Re:..that and refuse drug tests by aardvarkjoe (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:24AM
  • Next we'll have Echelon for DNA by MissKitty (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:24AM
  • Re:Hmmmm. . . by Wansu (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:24AM
  • What about legally taken drugs? by null-loop (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:41AM
  • Discrimination by jyuter (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @02:42AM
  • Aaaaah! (Score:4)

    by deefer (82630) on Monday July 10 2000, @02:42AM (#946537) Homepage
    Another scary innovation.
    As with all scientific advances, this throws up a whole load of interesting situations...
    Depending on how sensitive and correct this device is, I can see some being installed in London, UK. Mention "terrorist" in England and you get some pretty draconian legal powers (such as extended questioning periods etc) to use and abuse.
    So these are set up at airports... "To trap the terrorists"
    Then set up at train stations... "To trap the terrorists"
    Then set up at tube stations... "To trap the terrorists"
    Before you know it, the terrorist threat has disappeared. Do they remove these machines? Hell, no lets have them sniff for drugs/homosexuality/Linux!
    Think I'm paranoid? Then on my way to work, how come I drive through 3 manned police CCTV cameras left over from the "anti terrorist" Ring of Steel?

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

  • Fight the Future by kannen (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:43AM
  • Soap by victorchall (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:45AM
  • False Results by grahamsz (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:46AM
  • by KlomDark (6370) on Monday July 10 2000, @02:47AM (#946541) Homepage Journal
    This is the kind of stuff that should be illegal. Randomly sampling people as they walk by is no better than randomly searching peoples houses.

    This is precisely what is described by "Illegal search" (and maybe even seizure, as they are effectively taking pieces of you as you walk by). In a perfect world, I doubt this would stand up in court, as the "due process" required has to be done on an individual basis, not on a broad scope of mostly innocent people.

    What kind of people use their engineering talent to make such things? I would refuse. People do not see the long term cyclical nature of government. Everyone should take an Ancient Western Civilization class. Watch how the ancient civilizations grew, became strong, then became oppresive, then were overthrown for the greater good of humanity. This stuff will only prolong the suffering of humanity when the current civilization's time has come, making it difficult for the cycle to advance to the next level. Instead we end up in a totalitarian, invasive sitiuation.

    Don't forget the children who have to live in this world we create...

  • Re:Errr... by Aos (Score:1) Thursday July 13 2000, @02:27PM
  • Trap, not analyze, DNA by tcomeau (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @02:47AM
  • Re:even better by jbarnett (Score:2) Friday July 21 2000, @04:24AM
  • Re:Guilty before proven innocent? by KlomDark (Score:1) Sunday July 23 2000, @05:36PM
  • A Day at the Airport by (void*) (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:47AM
  • Re:Get used to it... by andyt (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:22AM
  • Re:Hmmmm. . . by msaulters (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:24AM
  • I'm done shaking hands... by cvd6262 (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:25AM
  • Jamming The System (Score:4)

    by Steve B (42864) on Monday July 10 2000, @05:28AM (#946550) Homepage
    They tried a primitive version of this sort of thing in Vietnam, using chemical and vibration sensors on the Ho Chi Minh Trail [vietsandiego.com]. The sensors were defeated by hanging buckets of urine next to chemical ones and driving cattle past the vibration ones. Methods of jamming modern versions are left as an excersize for the student.
    /.
  • Re:Guilty before proven innocent? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:40AM
  • Re:Aaaaah! by GRAMMERSoft (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @05:29AM
  • by xtal (49134) on Monday July 10 2000, @06:50AM (#946553) Homepage

    Companies have the right to not allow people using drugs into their workplace. Rightly, they realize that it can be disruptive. If everyone would be honest and upfront about using drugs, they wouldn't have to bother -- but this isn't an ideal world.

    BULLSHIT. Thinking like this is WRONG. If I show up drunk, stoned, or high, you have every right to fire me ON THE SPOT. Why should it matter to you what the hell I do on my own time, in my own house? What's next? Testing to see if I have multiple sex partners? How about a AIDS test? I mean, that's something YOU did, right? If everyone was up front about having AIDS, then there wouldn't be a problem?

    If you really don't like it, you can go somewhere else, of course. But don't go yelling about your 'rights' just because a company wants to keep its workplace safe.

    So, we'll test everyone for AIDS, because what if someone gets cut, right? THIS IS STUPID. If you want to pay me for 24/7 availability, then sure, you can drug test me. But when I'm off company time - what I do is none of the company's business, period.

    If you're concerned enough about soft drugs, then you should test for alcohol too, and fire anyone who does not comply - because we can't have people drinking, either, even if it's off company time. It might affect their preformance! And cigarette smokers. Those things are deadly! The workplace is much safer if there isn't anyone who craves a smoke at an inappropriate time. Never mind all those smoke breaks you can get rid of!

    How about police agencies! They don't have scheduled drug testing - it in fact, is done at the time of hire and RARELY after. Why? Because the police unions are dead-set against it. Let's test all those FBI, DEA and BATF agents _monthly_. I wonder what would happen then.. sure it might cost a little, but they have to do something with all the money they gather from drug dealers! Why not "purify" their ranks?

    This arguement pisses me off. If I'm not preforming, or am presenting a danger to others, FIRE ME FOR THAT. If I'm a happy little worker, it's none of your business what, or who, I do on my own time.

    And yes, I take my skills elsewhere. Drug laws scare me not because I'm a user (I'm not) but because I see my freedom going down the toilet - because I look at what happened south of the border. I just get a kick out of companies that test in their US offices and not in Canadian ones. What, are Canadian offices more dangerous? YEESH.

  • Wife's hair? by ca1v1n (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:52AM
  • Yes, But by game-theory (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @06:53AM
  • Re:Gattaca by ca1v1n (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @06:59AM
  • Panic Now ? by davonds (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @07:00AM
  • About Canada by BluedemonX (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @07:06AM
  • Re:Easy solution - ban DNA cross referencing by John Jorsett (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @07:07AM
  • Spam DNA! (Score:3)

    by MostlyHarmless (75501) <.artdent. .at. .freeshell.org.> on Monday July 10 2000, @02:48AM (#946560)
    I bet everyone on /. will be going "Yay! New technology!", but we have to worry about one thing: What happens next? An evil corporation buys a 2x2 foot block of ceiling somewhere and gathers DNA. It then correlates the DNA to your e-mail address, home address, and SSN (if it can get it). Corporations now have a perfect way of identifying someone perfectly -- After all, DNA doesn't lie, does it?

    It does. Remember, it can't tell what it's gathering or where it came from. It would be trivial to walk underneath one of those things and shake a vial of someone else's dandruff over its sensor. Voila! You have an effect similar to the cypherpunk/cypherpunk registrations on annoying news sites. Suddenly, this Evil Corporation has one John Smith on 31337 Haxor Lane, New York, NY walking into its store several times per second. It's "Hack life" on a whole new level.
  • Re:What about legally taken drugs? by revin (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:49AM
  • I cast my vote for creepiest patent by mrbuckles (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:52AM
  • Re:Spam DNA! by (void*) (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @02:52AM
  • It's all a matter of time... by Phizzy (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:52AM
  • another movie reference for you by twitter (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @02:53AM
  • Re:Will it work by techwatcher (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @02:58AM
  • DNA Ownership laws required by Ars-Fartsica (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @03:00AM
  • Privacy Schmivacy by Baldrson (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @07:16AM
  • Let there be light by cmpgn (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @07:22AM
  • Flakes are Waste by burris (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @07:27AM
  • Re:Easy solution - ban DNA cross referencing by styopa (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @07:49AM
  • missle shield program by styopa (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @07:52AM
  • Re:Something you can do (in U.S.) to protect liber by styopa (Score:2) Monday July 10 2000, @08:00AM
  • by xtal (49134) on Monday July 10 2000, @03:02AM (#946574) Homepage

    You americans have an opportunity to make a real stand here, and it will solve the problem of people spying on your DNA - simply BAN the cross referencing of a DNA database with public info, like for instance, your social security number. If your DNA cannot be used to identify you, this won't be a problem from the standpoint of raw information collection for marketting purposes (although might be valid statistically, for instance, all the caffiene molecules being secreted through the pores of coders in the development building.. heh heh)

    As for explosives testing.. the american people need to vote on what they want more: Freedom or safety. You can be perfectly safe, more or less, but you'll be living in a police state. But, this is something the country will decide, personally, I'd rather live in a rural setting where the man doesn't have as many rights to get on my land.

    The drug issue is worse though, and it's why I'll never move to the US. What if I toss a couple grams of an illicit substance in your car and then call the cops? What if I sprinkle you with coke in an elevator? The shit will hit the fan, and with the way the US drug laws work currently, your life is over and you very well might lose your car, if I phrase my "anonymous tip" correctly.

    Something to think about..

  • Re:Guilty before proven innocent? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:06AM
  • Re:Hmmmm. . . by java_sucks (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:11AM
  • by JatTDB (29747) on Monday July 10 2000, @03:16AM (#946577)
    This is similar to the arguments surrounding traffic stops. In most areas in the US, it is perfectly legal for the police to stop and check every driver on the road, as long as they check EVERY driver who comes to the checkpoint. It sucks, but the courts have upheld it.

    On your point about engineer integrity, this is a really tough question for a lot of people who work on such things. Personal beliefs and convictions are a hard thing to overcome; perhaps these engineers sincerely believe that they are working in the best interests of their fellow man. The too-happy and annoying church people that knock on my door from time to time do something that I could not do within my ethical outlook, but from their perspective the privacy violation is justifiable by the chance to save my soul or something along those lines.

  • Our Choice? by stuffman64 (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:23AM
  • Re:Rebel without a clue = you by deefer (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:28AM
  • Privacy by Morphine007 (Score:1) Monday July 10 2000, @03:29AM
(1) | 2 | 3