When I was in college my roommate and friends successfully ran a campaign to get Gumby elected student President, highlighting how useless student government really is.

Aside from his 15 minutes of fame, I don't really see how the reward justified the risks he took, although encore proved a significant lack of common sense.

...what a PC is. They think it stands for "politically correct", if they think at all. They also believe that the internet only exists on their iPhone or iPad, and cannot conceive of the idea that the internet is available on a computer.

...it just creates new ones.

The moment I read Orson Scott Card's article for The Mormon Times, he became dead to me as an author, which is unfortunate. I had enjoyed his fictional works up until that point, but I could not in good conscience continue reading work created by someone with such monstrously skewed views regarding equal marriage rights. Marriage rights is one of the least of the world's issues, and certainly not worthy of his call to overthrow the government. From that point forward I understood that Card was an individual so caught up in the tenets of his belief system that he could not bear the thought of that belief system being changed, even though we are supposed to be living in a country with a separation of Church and State (and let's not go off on to that tangent right now or we'll be there forever).

I have made a personal choice to avoid this man's work because I consider it to be contaminated with his personal views. However, I believe his statement regarding tolerance has some merit, not because he said it, but rather because punishing an adult by doing something to them that they have done to someone else rarely changes that adult in ways that are beneficial. There is a distinct difference between justice and revenge. "We should ruin him because he said hateful things," is in itself a hateful thing to declare.

That said, here is nothing wrong with stating the following: "Look at what Orson Scott Card wrote. I disagree with what he said. What do you think?"

That'll save me the hassle of having to manually update the unsupported Cyanogenmod fork for the Nook HD

Because aside from RAM and hard drive, there are none. Imagine if you could buy one battery or A/C adapter that was compatible with every laptop manufactured over the past three years? Imagine if you could replace a broken screen with another one for less than $100.00? Imagine if you could upgrade the processor, or swap out the motherboard for one that had a better/faster GPU? To be honest, I'm surprised nobody else has suggested this yet.

I find Unity jarring. I gave it an honest go on three different Ubuntu releases, then finally couldn't stand it anymore, switching first to Gnome 2 fallback mode, then to Gnome 3 (very briefly), then ultimately dumping Ubuntu entirely and reverting to Gnome 2 on Debian Squeeze. So to me, Mark is saying Ubuntu on the tablet wouldn't be any MORE jarring than it already is on the desktop. I'm fairly certain I'll pick up negative karma for sharing that opinion, but it is honestly my opinion.

Ultimately it doesn't matter to me, I believe Canonical sold out its initial user-base and is now riding the wave of notoriety created by that user-base, many of whom have since moved on to Mint or some other distro. I also am of the opinion that the novelty of this tablet-to-desktop / phone-to-desktop docking will soon wear off when people experience the performance difference when compared to an actual desktop computer or laptop, especially after factoring in the price.

Oh I agree that my analogy is imperfect, and that it does not directly have anything to do with warrantless tracking.

I'm just stating the obvious, in that typically, unless you are using encryption, you may not want to use email for the communication of anything you consider sensitive. Therefore, if you're not transmitting anything sensitive, it's unlikely anyone snooping is going to find anything sensitive, without someone other than you having put it there.

That said, I think I've just discovered the ultimate merit in your stance. With these broad powers, it would be trivially easy for someone abusing their powers to frame an individual by fabricating an email message and using it as "supporting evidence".

Whenever anyone starts freaking out about email snooping, I find it is a good time to point out that an email message that is not encrypted is roughly as secure in transit as a postcard.

I used to be a pretty avid PC gamer but as a father of six I tend to fill a support role in our household, which doesn't leave a lot of time for gaming. However, I live vicariously though my six, nine and eleven year old daughters who like PC games (especially Minecraft - I set up a LAN server for them), but they also spend a significant amount of time watching YouTube, playing Flash games on websites, and watching Netflix. We have a PS3 slim that gets a significant amount of use by my three year old daughter (Little Big Planet 2, predominantly), and a Nintendo Wii that's been mostly neglected (haha Nintendo). We also have a PS2 slim, and four vintage arcade cabinets (of the four, Soul Calibur III gets the most use).

The desktop computers are also primarily needed for school, and because three of our children need them for schoolwork each day, if one of them is down it causes a problem. When the desktop running Windows 7 (for game support) was compromised by a drive-by trojan, presumably from one of the flash game sights that are rather heavy on the advertising, I spent four days trying to repair it before throwing in the towel (bear in mind I've worked over a decade in the PC repair industry, and my malware removal/repair skills are not insignificant - this was an unrepairable mess).

Each computer in our house (except my wife's Windows 7 laptop) is now running Debian stable. I wouldn't wish this solution on someone else due to the amount of time getting everything set up, but for us it works. I've also found that once I have a LINUX system established, it tends to remain stable (with the exception of when my three year old somehow enabled all of the Accessibility options on one of them simultaneously - that was fun to undo). Each desktop has Minecraft installed. The girls would like Windows games, but the amount of effort involved in getting one running via Wine (or Crossover, or even PlayOnLinux) typically far exceeds the amount of free time I currently have available. Whenever they complain I point out the PS3, the PS2, the Wii, the arcade machines, and that pretty much ends that dialogue. Yes, first world problems.

I have found compositing to be problematic in day to day use on LINUX and up until Ubuntu moved to the Unity platform I kept it disabled (right after the initial luster of Compiz Fusion wore off). This is one of several issues that drove me away from Ubuntu and I now prefer Debian Squeeze. Usability is my primary selector in a LINUX distro, whether I'm browsing the web, developing, editing an image, running a 3d Windows game in Wine, or rendering a video. If my 7 year old laptop becomes sluggish and unresponsive because the memory shared with the GPU is being used to create a shiny new tablet-friendly interface, then that OS no longer qualifies as usable on that platform. The idea that I should have to buy a new laptop with a better 3D accelerator so that I can continue to use the latest newest shiniest LINUX distro is ridiculous.

In my opinion, all modern OS developers seem to have forgotten that the primary purpose of the OS is to provide (easy ?) access to the software the end user needs to run and a stable platform for it to run upon. A desktop environment should not require a 3d capable GPU to be rendered efficiently. The idea that it should is roughly akin to claiming it would be more efficient to drive a five minute commute with a high performance sports car.

This is not progress, it's the illusion of progress.

1. Slackware in 1996
2. Redhat in 2003
3. Ubuntu in 2005
4. #! (CrunchBang) in 2012
5. and currently Debian in 2012

I dropped Ubuntu earlier this year over a number of things, most recently Canonical's announcement regarding UEFI. Mark's "Erm, we have root" comment only made that decision permanent.

...would this be a possible link to the childhood obesity epidemic?

Another possible theory (and I use the term theory because there are presently no unbiased studies that have looked thoroughly into both short term and long term effects of multiple vaccines being administered simultaneously to a human) is that the average child's immune system, which is known to be in its development stage until approximately eight years of age, has been partially compromised by receiving 21 vaccines (or more if they have received their yearly flu shot) by the age of six. Therefore the resulting under developed immune system that has never had to create its own antibodies naturally is potentially more susceptible once the temporary protection afforded by the vaccine in question has worn off. This in combination with a diet consisting primarily of foods containing refined flour, refined sugars, monosodium glutamate, and high fructose corn syrup alongside lack of exercise and exposure to contaminants in the food supply, water supply and air can all contribute to the susceptibility of an individual to a disease or illness.

The assumption that there is one smoking gun that either explains or can prevent these health issues is a common phenomenon on this site, and one that I believe is deeply flawed.

Crystal Meth has been found to cure cancer!

Just by reading through the comments here makes it clear that everybody has their own opinion as to what is healthy.

Do you really want to let someone else mandate for you what healthy food is, based on the variety of responses?

Seems to me only a few people would benefit, and most would suffer under this proposal.

In America, it seems like few citizens want to take responsibility for their own health, so I wouldn't be very surprised if this should someday come to pass.