I bought a good inkjet printer years ago that wasn't cheap, but had cheap ink. I bought it at the height of Hewlett-Packard's "liquid gold ink - cheap printer" strategy.

I still use it frequently. Individual cartridges are â3.50, a full set of four CMYB is â11.00.

It's the Canon Pixma IP3000. It prints at 4800 x 1200 dpi. It prints double sided from its 150 page paper tray. It does photo prints well when using the correct paper. It can handle envelopes, cardboard, CDs and other materials that can't be bent or folded from it's manual feed. I think it's from 2003 and I still find it a great printer.

You are complaining about the funding models, not peer reviewed publishing.
I agree on the funding models having problems. The issue there is that most funding is influenced by politics, which in turn is influenced by established industry powers.

The point of the ISS was to figure out long term space habitation and how to build a big space station.

I don't know how to do that any other way, please enlighten me.

The problem with that philosophy is the less able drivers, like the elderly, who need that amount of attention to function at, or too often, well below the speed limit.

The speed limit doesn't exist for you, roads are designed so that grandma can drive it. That's why it is boring for most able bodied younger people.

The second problem is that a lot of people underestimate their reaction time. This is because your body lies to you and delays your perception to make it seem you react much faster than you actually do.

The combination of these two factors is that with higher speed limits, or when speeding, you end up with lot's of crashes between high speed vehicles and "grandma".

There is plenty of evidence. for example, traffic accidents in Belgium used to be 4x higher than in the Netherlands, until they changed their law to allow speed cameras, just like in the Netherlands. This dropped the number of traffic accidents by a factor of 3 as people stopped speeding.
That's a HUGE difference.

My problem with the new Star Trek movies is that they're fun, but they're not Star Trek. They're an SF action movie in Star Trek clothes.

Star Trek is always about the human condition. When I leave the theatre after a ST movie, I want to be asking myself if I would have done the same thing as in the movie.

The Adams ST movies have none of that, they're as empty as a Transformers movie.

A Star Trek movie needs to make me wonder and question myself.

I think the first-part-the-pole district based system is very flawed.

- It makes lawmakers more beholden to local constituencies that to the general good of the country.
- It leads to a two party system.
- It makes it really hard to create new parties to keep the system fresh and with-the-times.
- Because everything is represented in only two parties, these parties are overly broad and tend to have a lot of infighting.
- It makes things like gerrymandering possible.
- It makes some votes much more valuable than others. (swing states).

It's only advantage is that you're almost sure to always have a governing majority. Unless you split your government into multiple chambers and elections of course...

If pay-per-month streaming services would be available in my country. (The Netherlands).

The only options I have are Spotify and iTunes. And iTunes only started selling a few movies last year, before that they only had music.

iTunes USA refuses to sell to me, as do Netflix, Hulu and the like, because I'm in the wrong country.

If I'm lucky something will be released on DVD two or more years after it was aired for the first time, if it's released in Region 2 at all, sometimes there is only a Region 1 release.

No wonder illegal downloading is big in my country.

Unfortunately Netflix and such aren't available in my country. I do have a Spotify premium account and I like it a lot.

It all comes down to being able to watch/listen where, when and how I want without limitations.

Spotify allows me to download my playlists to my phone or my laptop and listen to it everywhere.

I had cases where I had legitimately bought the Blu-Ray, but the system crapped out when I tried to run it and it needed a software update. After messing with it for over an hour, I just downloaded a ripped version and watched that, it was easier than trying to get the Blu-Ray disk to work. (Avatar if you're interested, there were a lot of people with problems with that one).

I also might want to watch some episodes of a TV series I have on my phone or tablet. But this is a pain as well.

I hardly download anything. Nowadays if I can't easily watch/listen to it legally in the way I want, I just don't buy it. (I haven't bought a Blu-Ray disk since the pain I had with the Avatar disk, even though I did get it to run after messing with the software update some more on a later date).

If it's harder to use the legal medium than it is to use the illegal medium, then they need t fix things.

Which in turn is Google's fault for designing Android to be sold that way. They deliberately choose not to have control over the fragmentation and issues like this.

There are definitely positions at the Bachelor and Master level (In Comp.Sci or equivalent) at universities and research institutes.
Also don't forget large oil firms and the like.

There are two types:
- Scientific Programmers: Those that work on implementing, scaling and optimizing algorithms for number crunching purposes. Knowledge of the specific field is certainly an advantage here.
- Generic Programmers: From lab automation to webpages, database backends, archives and various other things that organisations need to do their work.

It's hard to get a permanent contract though, as a lot of the funding is on projects for 2-5 years.

Job adverts might be on the sites of the organisations themselves and sometimes the employers have a combined website. In the Netherlands there is AcademicTransfer for example, where all publicly funded research organisations pool their job adds.

I think in places like NYC it has to do with real estate prices. Everything above ground is probably expensive as humans can live/work there. It's the underground places where no sunlight penetrates that gets the machines and utilities as nobody cares if they have any windows. Also these machines are usually heavy so it's easy to put them into basements as no lifting is required and means the structure of the building can be lighter.

It's not a good idea in case of disasters, but it makes a lot of economic sense in the short term for a lot of reasons. The problem is that especially the USA isn't very good at having their infrastructure and buildings robust against disasters. To an outsider it's obvious that the choice in the US seems to be that it's cheaper to rebuild than to make things hurricane/flooding/tornado/earthquake-proof. The best example is Katrina. Areas in the Netherlands have separate organisations for managing the water. It's not part of government and has it's own taxes and separate elections. A lot of these go back to medieval times. They care for the waterways, dikes, levies, shelters, disaster relief and similar structures. It's their sole responsibility and absolute priority. So there is never a trade-off against healthcare, military, education, transportation or any other government function. It's like if you would make FEMA and the corps of engineers into completely independent organisations with their own taxes and elections.

Well, they are using data from TomTom as far as I understand.

I have the TomTom app on my iPhone and it's a lot better than the iOS 6 maps though. It's expensive and takes a lot of storage space, but it's great, especially if you might find yourself without network/internet in a foreign country or just a remote location. I have literally crossed 3 continents with it. The quality of the app, POI and map data is very very good. I must have spent about $100 to get North America, Europe and Oceania, but its well worth it. It knows all speed cameras and speed limits, it must have saved me a multitude of my investment in speeding fines alone.

Given that Apple apparently uses the same data, I'm surprised at how much worse their results are.

I find that the TomTom apps for the iPhone have both very good POI and map data. I've literally crossed 3 continents with them and they're really really good. They're not free though and take a lot of storage space.

Apple has done much worse with the same data than TomTom itself. I was rather surprised and disappointed.

I have the TomTom apps on my iPhone for several continents. They take a lot of space, but work very very well. I've travelled in Europe, North America and Australia/New Zealand, it has been very accurate, has a very good points-of-interest database, voice navigation, lane assist, traffic assist and up to date and correct maps.

I am very surprised that the quality of the iOS map application is so much less. It's very not-Apple (maybe post Steve Jobs?) to release like this, and also I would not like to be TomTom at this moment, if must rub off on them a little as well.

The TomTom applications aren't cheap, and take many GB of space (about 5 GB per continent), but they allow you full offline navigation. Personally I haven't regretted spending the money one second, and several times it has saved me a lot of time and trouble, especially in rural areas of places like Nevada, Australia, Sweden if you need to find a fuel station, restaurant, place to sleep or get to one you one you booked earlier. But it also works in NYC or Paris.

I'm just surprised.

I was under the impression that education at the university level was not job training but about concepts and understanding.

I would expect a new student at a university to already know these things.