I very much welcome any proprietary software on Linux that does the job better.
Then why not just run Windows as it does the job much better than the buggy and slow Linux desktop?
I've written many ActiveX controls, some for use in a browser, some not.
At no point was I required to sign or agree to a license to do so.
You can make ActiveX controls with any compiler that supports WIndows and will create DLLs with C++ calling conventions that match the MS style
ActiveX is no different than XPCOM
The only insightful thing about your post is that slashdot has fallen to the point that this sort of ignorance is so commonplace that you got modded to +5
Heh! We can always go and see: Google Search: site:slashdot.org activex
Here's an ActiveX discussion in Slashdot from 10 years ago: Brian Hook on the ActiveX Experience
Isn't there a radio signal transmitted in most modern countries specifically FOR synchronising times without a hardline or remote purposes?
There is WWV in United States and DCF77 in Europe.
"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll