Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Disengenous (Score 1) 306

it is trivially easy

Provided they have the capital, can find appropriate unsigned talent, negotiate around any contracts put into force with the backing of monopoly power on other bussiness that support the industry, and survive the assult on all fronts by the incumbant.

Comment Re:Ummm.. (Score 1) 200

It is important to note that base pay for that major is probably less then half of their total monetary compensation, and a large portion of that compensation is tax-free. BAH could be several thousand a month all by it's self.

A quick google search showed average compensation is about $101K/year

I feel the 0-4 is certainly worth it, in many respects.

Comment Re:Get used to this... (Score 1) 250

There is a diffrence to having speech and having the right to free speech. There is no fundemental reason that a coorporation should have "rights" as they are regarded and defined in the Constitution. That doesn't mean that they don't have the ability to exercise the same functions, which they obviously do. What it does mean is that law can be constructed to limit their exercise of the same function.

For example, a corporation doesn't have the right to own a handgun.
The Government hasn't made a law restricting a corporation from owning a handgun.
The Corporation may buy and possess a handgun, should it's officers decide to do so.

This is the line of thinking that citizens united over turned.

In the above mentioned example, modified to refelect the personhood of a corporation:
A corporation has the right to own a handgun.
The Government may not restrict a corporation from to own a handgun.
The Corporation may decided to possess any number of handguns, should it decided to do so.

If you replace all mentions of people/citizens with corporation in the Amendments it is pretty scary. I was going to post it here, but after doing the 9th I couldn't go on.

Comment Re:Too bad this didn't happen in 50 years (Score 1) 44

Does Mars have ferrous in it's core? Wikipedia (I know, grain of salt) says Current models of the planet's interior imply a core region about 1,794 km ± 65 km (1,115 mi ± 40 mi) in radius, consisting primarily of iron and nickel with about 16–17% sulfur.

How much energy would need to be directed to Mars to melt the core, and would it naturally create a magnetic feild strong enough to protect the atmosphere?

Commets might be a bit of a blunt instrument for such an endevor, and certainly wouldn't work to keep the core liquid unless we added a lot of mass. I don't beleive there is a way we can accomplish the reheating the core, while still preserving the planet in a fashion that we could terraform. There has to be some wacky idea to do it.

Comment Re:Time will tell (Score 1) 354

But they have seen it. That's why they started creating their own content. They aren't going to be able to buy all the IP out there, and they can't lease what isn't up for grabs. However, if they can get into quality content generation, they have cost savings from vertical integration, and enough of a unique draw that they can put up with any IP owner that would deny access to their content. Granted, they aren't very prolific yet. They described it as being the HBO of the Internet before HBO can be the HBO of Internet.

Comment Re:De-salination? (Score 1) 110

Or have a closed loop exchange heat with an open loop, depending on the relative tempratures. If you have a liquid that significantly exceeds the boiling point of water in the closed loop there should be enough room to operate. Your going to loose effiency, there is a ton of Sun and open area in many dry places.

Slashdot Top Deals

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...