Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:No (Score 3, Insightful) 545

Yes, that whole model is flawed. SV may be making lots of money, but it's ruining people's lives if it expects insane work hours.

I work in the tech field (actually, I own a 10-person tech company) in Canada and I have never made my employees work overtime. Ever.

Unfortunately, given free reign, businesses will exploit employees and the labour laws in the US offer hardly any protection to workers.

Comment Ask these questions first (Score 1) 176

Before you think about how to run your shop, ask these questions:

Do you have a product?

Is there a market for that product? How do you know?

Do you have a business plan including a marketing plan?

Once you get past those questions, the rest is easy. Outsource anything that doesn't make sense (HR, accounting, payroll) and keep your core expertise in-house. Don't obsess about coding standards, etc. until you have cash flow. It's far more important to do your utmost to get the business making money thatn to worry about programming minutiae.

I did start a software product business back in 2000 and it's going strong. The very first person I hired was our VP of Sales and Marketing. I didn't hire another technical person until employee #5, so didn't have to worry about imposing coding standards on others. :)

Comment DMARC and Mail User Agents conspire to FAIL (Score 1) 139

I was involved in some quite heated discussions on the DMARC list about one problem. DMARC is supposed to prevent someone from forging the From: header sender (and to a lesser extent if used with SPF, the envelope sender.)

The problem is that most MUAs (mail clients) do not show the full email address of the sender. They only show the full name. For example, a header that looks like this:

From: American Express Fraud Dept <bozo@example.com>

will be displayed in a typical mail client as just American Express Fraud Dept with not a single complaint from DMARC.

Even worse, a scammer can use a header like this:

From: "American Express Fraud Dept - fraud@aexp.com" <bozo@example.com>

and the mail client will display the fake fraud@aexp.com address with nary a DMARC complaint.

Mail sucks. User-interfaces suck. People suck. Bah.

Comment We use DKIM and SPF (Score 1) 139

My company (Roaring Penguin) uses SPF for outbound mail and we DKIM-sign our mail too. Our antispam software also supports SPF and DKIM. We don't yet support DMARC, but probably will at some point. The problem with fully supporting DMARC is the reporting component. It's a real bear to send DMARC reports, but obeying DMARC policies is much easier. We'll start by doing DMARC-policy-obeying first and then think about reporting.

Comment Re:Possiblities (Score 1) 529

It is not time to panic. It is time to get serious about taking on and defeating the terrorists. That doesn't mean curtailing our civil liberties, but it does mean taking sensible precautions and not spouting Trudeau-esque bullshit about finding the "root causes" of terrorism.

There's a war on against Western democracies. We have to win it.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...