Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What do UKers think? (Score 1) 255

I don't think copyright should last any longer than 25 years or until the death of the creator. Whichever is longer. I don't believe people should be getting enriched long after the original creator has died. Copyright wasn't originally intended for that, It was intended to protect people from getting their work stolen, usually by large companies.

I also don't think ISPs should be included in the cost here. They aren't the ones with something to protect yet the cost is being thrown to them. Ofcourse as a business they will just pass it onto customers, so in the end it is just a tax on customers by corporations. I am sure there is going to be a lot of hush hush going on, but I bet people will start getting enraged when they find out they are paying to be spied upon.

The minister of communications must be an idiot if he actually believes what he says. This would actually benefit the creative economy? You know... them going after some of the people who aren't paying customers to begin with. Ofcourse there is the other side of the market they risk alienating as well. The people who download and later make a purchase because they liked it. They might become afraid to download something and then not purchase something, therefore reducing profits. What will they blame when that happens? As you mentioned before there is another useful group as well. The ones too poor to afford it but able to provide good word about it. Word of mouth and online reviews can go a long way to increase sales when a product is good. Corporations can't seem to factor that into their profit estimates, but somehow can make up imaginary losses. Many people these days don't tend to buy something on a whim. They realize there is just too much garbage out there and have usually been screwed at least once before.

Comment Re:More like... (Score 1) 385

You, like this article, seem to confuse laziness with efficiency. Why do more work than you have to? If I can use a calculator faster than I do the math in my head or on paper, what is the problem? It allows for someone to do a higher volume of work with a lesser chance of errors.

If you couldn't Google something, can you imagine the time it would take to go through books to find your answer? Besides, being able to store large amounts of information does not make you smart. If that was the case, computers really would have already taken over the world... It is not about how much you can store, it is knowing what to do with the information when you have it.

Comment Re:I must have missed that episode (Score 1) 324

oops post fail lol

what it was supposed to be:

Added to post by Sloppy

Computer: "Initiating Auto-Destruct.. Please wait for programs to shut down safely."
Picard: "Initiate auto-destruct sequence!"
Computer: "Initiating Auto-Destruct.. Please wait for programs to shut down safely."
Riker: "The Borg are right, resistance really is futile..."

Comment Re:I must have missed that episode (Score 1) 324

Added to post by Sloppy Computer: "Initiating Auto-Destruct.. Please wait for programs to shut down safely." Picard: "Initiate auto-destruct sequence!" Computer: "Initiating Auto-Destruct.. Please wait for programs to shut down safely." Riker: "The Borg are right, resistance really is futile..."

Slashdot Top Deals

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...