It's no more unreasonable than asking "I want to send a stream of bytes to another computer on the internet, how would I do that?" and expecting an answer describing TCP sockets.
Because both are pretty unreasonable. Why would you expect someone to answer such a vague question by describing TCP instead of describing Ethernet, IP, UDP, FTP, HTTP, scp, etc.?
Or perhaps it's funded by the NSA. "Let's get a list of addresses where people want to hide from surveillance."
You mean a list of people stupid enough to think that the federal government would be bound by this list?
Doesn't that sound a whole lot like a list of addresses the police would love to have?
Why, are you worried that the police will come arrest you in the middle of the night just because you don't want amateur pilots sending drones over your house?
Explain to us why we should not expect these guys or their business partners to profit off our personal information.
Of course I haven't read the article or looked at their web site, but what private information are they collecting? Assuming you have to own the land to be able to establish a no-fly zone, your name and address are already publicly-available information.
My shit might be stone age
Damn, what the hell have you been eating?
It's not like any of us schmucks will buy a rocket.
I won PowerBall last night, you insensitive clod!
Now if you make it look like a Corvette and can use the wipes to get reentry residue off the windshield my Heavy Metal wet dream will be complete!
Is the commanding officer of the mission Major Boobage?
Almost no games get below 40, while any game that doesn't get 80 or more is considerd a failure.
It depends on the scale that the rating uses. In most schools, anything below 60 or 70 is considered a failure; you did more than nothing (which would be a 0), but you didn't get enough correct to even be considered adequate. In game reviews, you could consider 50 to be the starting score that a game gets just for making it to the title screen. A score of 80 might be the minimum needed for a game to be considered successful (i.e. the equivalent of a C in school).
An enzyme takes the hydrogen back to protons and electrons...
Isn't that nuclear fission? That must be one hell of an enzyme. I hope the terrorists don't get their hands on it!
The idea that there were electrons in the nucleus of an atom went out of fashion when the neutron was discovered.
On the other hand, when you update to a new hard drive the system breaks as the UUIDs have changed even though / is still on
There's a very good reason for that. You don't want the decision of which partition to mount at / to be based on which disk device responded to probes from the kernel the fastest. As for relearning, the place to change the UUID for the partition that you want mounted at / is
3: SystemD is one large code blob with zero internal separation... and it listens on the network with root permissions. It does not even drop perms which virtually every other utility does. Combine this with the fact that this has seen no testing... and this puts every production system on the Internet at risk of a remote root hole. It will be -decades- before SystemD becomes a solid program. Even programs like sendmail went through many bug fixes where security was a big problem... and sendmail has multiple daemons to separate privs, unlike SystemD.
Because of course it's been years since anyone found any security holes in well-tested software like Bash or OpenSSL.
There's a facility already present in the system for doing what they're doing, and they simply ignore it, with consequences for users. And what's more, the facility works really well for what they're doing with it, which they're doing very poorly.
If a software package used an existing, high-quality facility for doing a particular task, someone somewhere would complain about the dependency.
So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand
