Comment Re:The vampires are real (Score 1) 330
My Startup GridSpy is based around this sort of monitoring, but making it easier to install and use.
My Startup GridSpy is based around this sort of monitoring, but making it easier to install and use.
My startup, GridSpy is a web based power monitoring system and I think that you are totally right.
Most homeowners are relatively minor power users and probably have a fairly good idea where the power is going already. Like you say, the cost of a monitoring solution is more than the likely savings over the course of a year.
However, there are lots of exceptions where power monitoring is useful. You might be considering upgrades to your house and you want to know where to put the money in. If your bill is mostly hot water heating, you might install solar hot water. Perhaps the heating turns out to be the major power hog so you improve your insulation and install a new heat pump.
After you have made these changes, it is very difficult to actually prove that there was an improvement unless you are monitoring the power for the related circuits. GridSpy is perfect for this.
I think that the value add is even more evident for industrial scale power users or for off-grid homes, where the power cost is high enough to dwarf the cost of the monitoring equipment.
Shameless Plug:
My startup Gridspy also helps you to track your power usage, but with a web focus. You can see your power usage online, and the install is simple (you do it at the breaker box) so it doesn't require new appliances.
I've also written about how GridSpy works
A robot does fine at packing uniform objects into uniform packages, but good luck finding one that can pack your shipment from Amazon.com, or do basic construction work, or pull the ingredients for 50,000 gallons of Coca Cola off of shelves in a warehouse and mix them all together for you. There is still a lot of dull, brain-killing, menial work for humans to do. If you work in an office and have never set foot in any kind of industrial operation, you'll probably be surprised at how much stuff still needs to be done by humans.
There are already automation systems for warehouses, for instance robotic forklifts http://www.inro.co.nz/
Humans are great at packing odd shaped stuff. But when you have a lot of regular objects, look out for robots. This is just a matter of low hanging fruit - why make a flexible robot when simple robots are cheaper and the market is still huge and unsatisfied.
Grabbing large quantites of ingredients is a large scale logistical exercise. There are very few "moves" and a lot of small difficulties. Humans make sense here.
Construction is moving more in the direction of prefabed portions, where the tree was cut robotically by an operator assisted machine. The frames assembled in a factory under robot control. Humans on the job site are doing less and less of the raw, repetitive framing work - again we are well suited to decision making.
I like to think that Robots are doing all the boring stuff so we can do the fun stuff.
If you watch the video you'll see that the destination platform is under computer control. The pick and place machine probably knows (well in advance) where the wiimote commands have told the platform to move. There is a 100-500ms latency between tilting the controller and the platform velocity changing.
If the platform was attached to a long handle that a human could pull back and forth quickly I'd be more impressed. The platform could have a sensor underneath to tell the robot where it was or you could make the platform trackable by camera (which would add considerable latency).
However, most robots have well defined workspaces that don't have outside influences. A robot doesn't have to pass such a test to be useful.
It would be great to group all emails marked as spam by gmail into one folder, group it by spammer (or just main contents of message) and make those emails available to lawyers / forensics experts hoping to do some investigative research and bring a class action lawsuit.
If they simply picked the most "popular" spam message every week and got an award of $1000 per email when they located the spammer (keeping say 10%) it would be a nice profitable business.
Further - they cannot afford to do this sort of investigation on every single one of the millions of videos on Youtube.
I imagine that they have only had the resources to investigate a sample of the alleged videos well after the fact.
The hash collision between the DNA fingerprint of two individuals could be detected as data is added to the system. Those two individuals could then have a second fingerprint calculated to resolve the collision or could simply have a note attached to their file.
Obviously this only works if they achieve the 100% coverage that they are aiming for.
Also, I am totally against this scheme.
Sounds like we found the explanation for the Norfolk issue:
http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/02/17/196230/Time-Bomb-May-Have-Destroyed-800-Norfolk-City-PCs-Data
Get hold of portable property. -- Charles Dickens, "Great Expectations"