The full quote is "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." So the question is this: are guns an essential liberty? And is the safety obtained by restricting gun use (if there is any) temporary?

Note that it says "injured", and not "killed."

Not everywhere they go, but they do have about 46 guns per hundred residents.

"Pedophiles... Fucking immature assholes."

I lost it. You win, sir.

I think that for my first federal election, I had to wait in line outside, but that's only because it was done in a relatively unused office, and hence there was very little internal space. My other elections have since typically been at school gymnasiums, with much more space for queuing inside.

Or, you know, design the system so that affiliation is shown, and force it towards affiliation.

To be fair, the person swearing has to prove that they live in the same polling division as you. This person must have ID, and it specifically states that 1. "This person can only vouch for one person", and 2. "the person who is vouched for cannot vouch for another elector". This way you avoid one guy claiming he knows the whole block, and you also avoid a string of people being vouched for, and then vouching for others.

So while it should be easy to find a neighbour who knows you, if you're the kind of person who avoids ID, there's a decent chance that the people who know you also avoid ID.

You say "[c]hildren get too many vaccinations". How many is too many? And which diseases do you propose we stop vaccinating for?

Did you miss the one where the girl wanted to kill the mayor? Because I'm pretty sure that should be illegal.

What he means to say is that the procedures used to do those things will follow Canadian law. So instead of following the American rules for evidence gathering, Canadian laws will apply. This is presumably to make sure that the investigators aren't constantly second guessing if something is admissible or not because they're using an unfamiliar set of rules.

The melody is the simplest part of the song. Consider your country`s national anthem. Unless you're from Spain, it should have lyrics. Those lyrics are not the melody, but the pitch (high or low) and timing (long or short) that you sing along with is the melody. It is, roughly speaking, the part you hum or sing along with. Consider Twinkle Twinkle Little Star. The bit that you would recognize as that song is the melody. Basically, if one person can do it and still have it be recognized as that song (as opposed to another one), there's a pretty good chance it's the melody. Of course with more complicated music, the distinction between melody, counter-melody and accompaniment can be blurred a touch.