Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - The nuking of Duke Nukem (wired.com) 2

Rick Bentley writes: How Duke got Nuked.

Duke Nukem Forever, the game that has been in development for 12 long years was finally cancelled in May. With too much runway, both in time and cash, development demonstrated its gas-like properties by expanding to fill all available space. Co-owner and project head George Broussard lead the team from when he was 34 years old until May 6th, 2009, when he was 46, w/o ever shipping a working game. He may have said it himself when he stated “It’s our time and our money we are spending on the game. So either we’re absolutely stupid and clueless, or we believe in what we are working on.”, or maybe both, as it turns out.

Although the shutdown was previously reported on Slashdot, this new Wired article goes in depth behind the scenes to paint a picture of a mushroom cloud sized implosion. Developers spending a decade in a career holding pattern for below market salary with "profit sharing" incentives, no real project deadlines, a motion capture room apparently used to capture the motion of strippers (the new game was to take place in a strip club, owned by Duke, that gets attacked by aliens), and countless crestfallen fans.

*Sniff*, I would have played that game.

Comment contemplatign a career change (Score 1) 121

Generally they ignore the floor rule, and will just wrap their panties around their wrist when on stage to comply with the first (they're still wearing them, just not in the proper location). Every now and then though they'll get pressured to comply, resulting in the panties staying on and the bouncers literally having to carry the girls on their shoulders from stage to stage so that the girl never touches the floor

How did I miss being a domain expert in this field?

Comment Re:as they would say on FARK.. (Score 1) 572

Uhm ... why take all this so seriously? I mean, what's the big deal getting/giving a lap dance? It lasts one song, everyone is clothed, if you think it means anything then you are a confused customer. A backrub/massage is far more intimate and no one gets all flustered over that, storms out of anything or tells anyone to f-off. In fact, Google had an on staff masseuse for their Engineers all the time back in the day.

Seems like the only complaint to be made here is that there wasn't a male stripper on stand by on the off chance a female attendee showed up.

Comment Re:Maxwell Equations (Score 1) 249

What? Uhm, no.

Maxwell's 2nd equation, aka "Gauss' law for Magnetism", which is written in differential form as del * B = 0 (divergence of the magnetic field lines is zero). In integral form it's written as the double integral over a closed surface of the magnetic field lines is equal to zero).

Either way you look at it, that says "no magnetic monopoles". The law may need to be rewritten, but as written it does say no monopoles.

Comment Complete Military History of France (Score 2, Funny) 356

- Gallic Wars
- Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.

- Hundred Years War
- Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman." Sainted.

- Italian Wars
- Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.

- Wars of Religion
- France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots

- Thirty Years War
- France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.

- War of Revolution
- Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.

- The Dutch War
- Tied

- War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War
- Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.

- War of the Spanish Succession
- Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.

- American Revolution
- In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."

- French Revolution
- Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.

- The Napoleonic Wars
- Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.

- The Franco-Prussian War
- Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.

- World War I
- Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States [Entering the war late -ed.]. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.

- World War II
- Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.

- War in Indochina
- Lost. French forces plead sickness; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu

- Algerian Rebellion
- Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.

- War on Terrorism
- France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador fail after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.

Comment if this woman weighs as much as a duck, than she i (Score 0) 298

Bedevere: What makes you think she is a witch?
Villager: Well, She turned me into a newt!!
Bedevere: a newt?
Villager: I got better...

Villagers: BURN HER anyway! BURN! BURN! BURN HER!
B: Quiet, quiet, quiet, QUIET! There are ways of *telling* whether she is a witch!
Villagers: Are there? What? Tell us, then! Tell us!
B: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
V: BUUUURN!!!!! BUUUUUURRRRNN!!!!! You BURN them!!!! BURN!!
B: And what do you burn apart from witches?
Villager: More Witches!
Other Villager: Wood.

B: So. Why do witches burn?

Villager: (tentatively) Because they're made of.....wood?
B: Goooood!
Other Villagers: oh yeah... oh....
B: So. How do we tell whether she is made of wood?
One Villager: Build a bridge out of 'er!
B: Aah. But can you not also make bridges out of stone?
Villagers: oh yeah. oh. umm...
B: Does wood sink in water?
One Villager: No! No, no, it floats!
Other Villager: Throw her into the pond!
Villagers: yaaaaaa!

B: What also floats in water?
Villager: Bread!
Another Villager: Apples!
Another Villager: Uh...very small rocks!
Another Villager: Cider!
Another Villager: Uh...great gravy!
Another Villager: Cherries!
Another Villager: Mud!
Another Villager: Churches! Churches!
Another Villager: Lead! Lead!
King Arthur: A Duck!
Villagers: (in amazement) ooooooh!
B: exACTly!
B: (to a villager) So, *logically*...
Villager: (very slowly, with pauses between each word) If...she...weighs the same as a duck......she's made of wood.

B: and therefore...

Villager: A Witch!
All Villagers: A WITCH!

Comment Re:non-ionizing means no chemical reactions. (Score 1) 616

Show me how the receiving antenna changes at all. It doesn't, it is still a metal stick after working as antenna.

Looking at this screen isn't giving me cancer. I'd need UV or higher frequency, ionizing, radiation for that.

The scientific way of answering the question "does (low frequency) EM radiation effect biological systems (enough to give cancer)" is to apply the principals of science already known and to see if there is anyway within the model that it could happen. It can't. You can then go ahead and do a study anyway, to see if there is anything new to learn. Been done. There isn't, in this case, anything new to learn.

Non-ionizing radiation doesn't cause cancer, there is no reason to suspect it would. Saying "just because we can't prove it doesn't" is just like faith saying "we can't prove there isn't a God", and isn't science.

Comment non-ionizing means no chemical reactions. (Score 0) 616

It could induce microcurrents in some tissues, or cause certain molecules to resonate in a way which affected important chemical reactions.

That would also be known as "an increase in temperature", and you'd have to be standing damn close to the tower to get warmed up by it -- esp. by RF radiation.

If the radiation is non-ionizing then it does not induce any chemical reactions, nothing changes (except maybe something gets a little warmer). If you don't understand this last sentence then please go take a chemistry class and come back.

Slashdot Top Deals

Kleeneness is next to Godelness.

Working...