Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Ideal Process Description (Score 1) 50

Gasoline engines are only 10% efficient, so the scheme is less efficient than electric cars + solar panels.

This is a good point! Imagine we build a fleet of GenIV nuclear reactors which could power the world for 500 years just on the nuclear waste we already have sitting around. That's reliable, baseload power despite the weather or season or that other great problem solar advocates don't like to mention, 'the night'. Now imagine most cars are Electric, and just charge at home or work or the shops. There could even be fast-charge stations on highways.

Now imagine that we save the precious gasoline for heavy vehicles, trains, and jets. This is doable! I wish the developers in this field the best of luck.

Comment It's just silly (Score 1) 363

It's not like this one group are suddenly going to discover some magic new way of manufacturing solar PV cheap JUST BECAUSE they've decided to make it in the desert (horrible place) in Africa (sad place with sad history) because they have lots of sand. What am I missing? Rightly or wrongly, there's an exponentially growing solar PV world of industry out there trying lazer sliced 'sliver cells', dye-based photovoltaics that mimic nature's photosynthesis, and a bunch of other ideas.

But really, what we should be doing is pumping research into modularising Gen3 nuclear reactors and pulling them off the assembly line with standardised, routine safety inspections. Rather than reinventing the wheel each time we need to get Henry Ford about nukes. Build them fast, in an established routine, and it will make them cheap. Then when Gen4 arrives, Gen4 will just eat all that waste. Even just TODAY's nuclear waste could run the world for 500 years! And who knows what they'll have by then? A moon-base shooting solar PV into orbit for 24/7 space based solar power? Now THAT's solar I could live with! (But, with the tiny little detail of requiring the moon-base first. And hey, maybe we'll even crack fusion before then!)

Comment Solar PV? (Score 2, Informative) 117

The moment I read Solar PV I knew these guys had lost the plot. Why on earth do we need it to even have a pump, let alone moving parts and a costly Solar PV array to power it? If it's a big enough emergency, dump thousands of "Life Straws" into the field and let the wonder of the human mouth suck the water through the straw directly from the river, which filters it by the time it hits the lips. Solar PV? Are they trying to kill people by making this more expensive than it has to be? The Life Straw is also more flexible. People sometimes need to be on the move in emergencies. They can take their own Life Straw with them, and drink water from whatever river they find on the way.

There are also various bottle-filter versions that also use no power. They don't need it, as the hand cranks the water through the cleaning membranes.

There is also the Watercone, which again is portable, and can desalinate seawater with solar heat (but no Solar PV needed!) http://www.watercone.com/product.html But I guess when you work for MIT's space division and you have to reinvent something as basic as the wheel, one has to spend a million dollars to make a high tech space pen that will work in zero g rather than just use a pencil! The problem here, is we are talking about saving thousands of the world's poor. They can't afford the 'space-pen' version. (Or, more accurately, they can't afford the emergency relief agencies to have cost limit supply). Instead, lets dump thousands of Life Straws and Watercones, and let *people power* and sunlight provide the energy to save their own lives.

Comment Re:Bull (Score 1) 738

Dude, I totally agree with the recycling philosophy you're discussing. There are even new plasma burner technologies that will recycle municipal waste at an atomic level for us, ripping plastics and diapers and food waste back to constituent atoms and the resulting gases and slag are all used.
http://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recycle/

However, my main reason for posting was to ask: where did you get your awesome sig? It is hilarious.

"You can't make a race horse of a pig" "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"

Comment Re:That's all we need ... (Score 1) 116

Agreed! These suckers are going to be networked as well. You know what they say, "Complex systems collapse". Just imagine the software asking if you wanted to install the latest upgrades while you are trying to drive... imagine spam attacks... imagine porn attacks, on your windscreen, while driving around in public! Not good!

Comment Why so big? (Score 1) 277

OK, so shooting power in from space is a recurring theme in the quest for reliable baseload power. For me the dreamer aspect of this has always been launch costs, which the more serious slashdotters here have demonstrated just...don't...add...up. However, does the 'Hydrogen gun' make Space PV power, or even this solar wind power concept, economical? What do you all make of the Hydrogen gun? Indeed, does it warrant its own slashdot thread? (I've never known how to generate a thread here).

Personally with peak oil & global warming bearing down on us, I'm hoping we get serious about Gen3 and Gen4 nuclear power. (Gen4 promises to run the world for 500 years just on the nuclear 'waste' we have already produced). But I'd love to see the more technical slashdotters amongst us analysing conventional solar PV power beaming stations with the Hydrogen Gun economic models.

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...