Shearer backs up his points by quoting and interviewing only the experts that agree with him in the relevant fields of discussion and by quoting published hypocrisy from those in power.
Fixed that for you
I had this problem until I purchased a CHOE Stadium Qi Wireless Charger
http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ...
The one I had before was 3 coils two with a nice kickstand. I liked the idea of that since it would be easier to use the phone while charging but it would just start then stop charging. The beeps really got on my nerves and my phone would be dead by morning
The qi charger in my Camry has trouble charging my S6 even without a case on it.
I have two 3 coil qi chargers (one at work and one at home). They work great. I always end up breaking my charger ports so it's very nice for me to only need to use that port when transferring files between my phone and computer.
When any specific humans has 4 accident driving cars, on average exactly 50% of them were caused by that specific human.
And 50% were not.
I'm curious to why these accidents (the ones with humans driving) are even part of the statistics? Why was it not driving autonomously. Did the human take over due to them seeing the computer was not correcting to avoid the accident?
It makes me wonder how much of that driving was actually done while humans were are the wheel vs the machine.
what does it do at four-way stop if it was the second car there but the human in the first car is waving it on?
I hate these people, just so you know.
Same here. And by the time everyone is done waving at each other, everyone could have had their lawful turn.
I usually just ignore those people and wait my turn. It's a bit anti-social, but I not going to do that anymore than I will drive past the speed limit just because someone is tailgating me.
However, they have not yet got to the point of avoiding the stupid idiots on the road. 4 out of 48 to me represents the number of accidents that the autonomous system failed to avoid.
Exactly. And this is while going under 10 mph.
Only because our President threatened to go back and add conditions regarding bonuses and other regulatory measures in exchange for letting the banks hold on to the TARP money. Shortly after that all these troubled companies had plenty of cash to pay back the gov't with.
No - most did not want to accept tarp money but the Obama administration made them so they then tried to get rid of those loans as quickly as possible
http://www.businessinsider.com...
http://cnsnews.com/news/articl...
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB...
I agree but the target audience for ChromeOS is not one that would be running their own servers.
I've been running XBMC off of linux for years. It has always played everything at full screen with no trouble for me.
Surprise? Surprise? The whole purpose of this contest was to attract a Jihadi to shoot. Why else the extra extra guards?
Perfectly Texas entertainment. I'm calling this a success.
I guess you're the kind of person who thinks is a woman dresses provocatively, she has it coming, right?
T let's place it in Texas, where the kids are taught to shoot a gun before they can read.
You've never been to Texas, have you?
Why are you trying to break the internet?
We don't give a shit about what happens outside of the USA, I thought you guys knew that by now.
If only that were true...
Are you going to buy a coupon from them if someone can steal your credit card information from their payment system?
People still buy from Targert
"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll
