Oh.. one more thing... do those "unlimited" texts include international?
Can't speak for the OP, but my Canadian plan offers unlimited text messages to domestic and international numbers. And it's a $25 / month plan, so on the cheap end (for Canada).
I only pay if I'm texting from outside Canada.
The problem is the drunk one is the barkeep. The patrons told him to stop before he wrecks to whole place, but there is no stopping him. Every day he gets drunk and wreaks half the bar. Soon he'll be drinking alone. And it all started with that damn game of Dice.
So leave. If the new redesign is as bad as promised, I'll leave when the time comes. No need to ruin Slashdot ahead of schedule.
Approval or consent, English-American, verb: To use. To accept the licensing terms. To look at. To think about.
Approval? Consent? Nouns, both of them.
That's not a heatmap guys. It's a Choropleth map.
If you don't want the heatmap approach, this is a good way of exploring the data: http://workshops.boundlessgeo.com/tutorial-censusmap/_static/code/censusmap.html
Try, as old as theaters, and not just movie theaters, either. There are lots of people who don't need a cell phone to babble on anywhere and everywhere.
Yeah but with phones you only need one in the audience.
Installing things on slackware was/is almost always 'tar xvjpf source.tar.gz && cd source &&
Slackware is never that. Slackware is all about packages. Always.
The problem with automatic dependency checking is that because the computer is doing that checking for you, you are less likely to personally know what, exactly, what all those dependencies are for packages that you've installed, unless you've installed them very recently... which means that if you want to uninstall a package, and you don't want to keep around any other packages whose only purpose for being installed was to support the package that you no longer want, if you had to manually install those dependencies in the first place, you are in a good position to be able to know which packages you should be removing as well.
The problem with automated dependency checking is that when it breaks you are often fucked. So it's not so much that dependency checking is bad, but that it is very hard to get absolutely right, more so when you throw in extra repositories into the mix.
Contest to see who can be the most ridiculous. "Tag! You're it."
Rob Ford.
We win.
Never used Swype or one of it's copycats?
Now you're just trolling, aren't you
Wikipedia?
All of a sudden Jimmy Whales' huge face would appear over your entire browser window begging for money.
Yeah, and he'd be asking you to stuff it into his blow hole!
I'm looking for contradictory things.
The verb "to be" is very irregular in Turkish. But in reality other verbs are also irregular but to a lesser degree.
"Some" is at most "half" so there where apparently 33 333 conversations related to terrorist every day
If "some = at most half" then there would be less than or equal to 33,333 conversations related to terrorism every day.
You've mixed up "at most" and "at least".
And that's where you biffed it. The Guardian is as heavily biased as Fox News is. But you tend not to see biases towards things you agree with as clearly as things you disagree with, so I forgive your temporary bout of insanity in making that statement. Maybe they got this one instance right, maybe not. An entire slashdot thread has been created just so we can scream at, er, I mean, debate, the veracity of that statement. But... the Guardian is biased. Sorry man.
You don't have to be a post-modernist to agree that all media (hell, everyon) is biased. However, I don't think it is fair to compare the bias of the Guardian with the bias of Fox News. There are degrees.
One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis
