No, that was a more different "S".

You're doing it wrong. You were supposed to attack their sexuality.

There's two sides to that coin. Software with high production costs do need to be extremely popular to make porting to apple OSs worthwhile; however, products with low production costs benefit by being as widely available as possible without the worry of massive overhead. Furthermore, simple programs are more likely to be accepted as they pose less threat.

That's a wonderful idea! Money addiction!

"Have you acquired large amounts of liquid assets? Do you feel as though the desire for more wealth is consuming your life? Is your estate becoming burdensome in its enormity? Come to the Greed-Addiction center. We can help! I guarantee it! Cash, credit and money orders accepted."

And, as evidenced by this article, totally unreasonable. Not just to ask, but to expect. Meet the new boss...

It would be cool if it was alive today...

Yeah... That would roc!!

CNN: Thieves strike Apple store in NJ... I'm just saying.

Good thing they didn't shoot the guard though. Bet the judge would have given them iLife.

The joke's on the thieves really. I hear that by the time they made it back to the hideout 13 of those iPhones had cracked displays.

See, now I read the title and thought "great! That damn thimble WAS always falling off the board!"

I empathize. I had cataract surgery (lens removal) at a very young age. At the time replacement was not an option. My brain never learned to use binocular vision. As it's now a nuerological issue, medical science has a way to go for me. I too am eagerly anticipating 3-d video that doesn't require two healthy eyes.

It doesn't matter if the notice is valid if the host fears the issuers lawyers more than the poster. That's one of the worst parts of the act: it encourages hosts to assume infringement solely on the basis of one accusation.

I think that distrusting someone who pursues a life working and rising within an inherently broken system is healthy and rational. "Compromise" is the word of the day in political systems, why would the concept stop before principles? Show me a modern politician who actively pursues less power for himself personally. (Yeah yeah, I like Paul too, but I promise you'll be flamed if you use him in this argument. You know who you are.) I think the best one can say of politicians is that some few start out with good intentions.

"You are screwing yourself and your fellow employees."

If you're not exempt, and especially if you have a job that logs time, this has to be reiterated. You may be willing to trade your free time to help yourself, your team, or your company. A world where nothing ever goes wrong could accept this kind of behavior. Unfortunately, we live in a world with lawyers (apologies Ray if you're reading, you're my hero). If you're off the clock and anything that needs to be "official" (read: "documented") happens, your life just got a new headache. "Why were you there? Was it your fault? Were you involved? Again, why were you there?" If your coworker sues because they feel like their job depends on doing unpaid work, what will you say when they ask you the facts? Who have you helped then? You make yourself more of a liability by working off the clock. To me, the cost outweighs the benefit, from the perspective of both employer and employee.

"Hyperdimensional RAID 1" Sounds like a Dalek Universal Domination plan. "EXTerminate!"