Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Start at the Reboot (Score 1) 2

I agree with this completely. I started watching at the beginning of the reboot (Eccleston is still my favorite Doctor), have followed it ever since without missing an episode or a special. Netflix is great for that.

I also tried to watch some of the older Tom Baker stuff, as well as first first season stuff. Couldn't get through it. Sorry, die-hards... I suppose without the emotional attachment some of you may have to the older episodes, they just seem too dated and corny.

Comment Re:Not suprising... (Score 1) 448

I once saw photos taken by a (IIRC) French photographer at the previous turn of the century (1900s) of nude adolescent girls playing in the water. That's all. Nothing sexual about it. They're about as arousing as a table leg. I can't remember the photographer's name, but that's beside the point. In other countries, he's considered a great artist. In the US a child pornographer.

We in the US have retarded attitudes towards sex and we are the twisted ones. If you think nude pictures of child are pornography, then that means you find them arousing and that you are the sick bastard.

All those judges who ruled that pictures of children are pornography are the perverts.

We in the US are pretty much perverts.

The French photographer's work that you allude to may very well be art; I haven't seen it, but assuming that it was non-sexual in nature, and the fact that swimming in the nude wasn't terribly uncommon then, sure... let's call it art.

Pictures of one's kids in the bathtub? I'm sure that's innocent 99.999% of the time. I've heard stories of parents being arrested and charged because some panicky Pete at the developers saw the pictures and called the authorities, and I think that's patently absurd.

However, pictures or videos of pre-adolescent children being sexually violated? Please tell me how you would defend that.

So, no, perhaps not all photos of nude children should be considered porn, but neither can you say that none of them can. I have this funny feeling that all you people who like to sit on your intellectual high horses and pontificate as to the literal meanings of this or that might feel a little differently if you found out your babysitter was taking pictures of her boyfriend molesting your 3 year old. To pretend otherwise just seems smug to me.

Games

Submission + - Best paper and dice games for younger kids?

Norwell Bob writes: OK, forgive me if this has been covered before. I've never really been into paper and dice games; I played some back in my mid-teens, but never really ran with those circles and subsequently never got very good or involved. Anyways, I've got three sons, the younger of two being 11 and 7. I certainly can't fault their love of video games, and they do their fair share of independent, imaginative play... but I'd also like to get them more involved in turn-based games with a defined rule set (the turn-based part being something that video games are lacking these days).

I've gotten them into the game Risk, but my 7 year old doesn't really like it and so most times it ends up being me crushing my 11 year old's army despite my efforts to "take it easy". He still loves the game, and even plays the PC version. They've both got pretty good imaginations (if somewhat limited to WWII scenarios with little green army men), and so I would love to find a more open game to nurture that.

Can any of you ladies or gents clue me into an imaginative, turn-based, paper and dice game that could be played by me with my sons? The 7-year-old is sharp beyond his years, the 11-year-old has been diagnosed with NLD (hence the obsessive focus on WWII and my desire to expand his horizons). My oldest (17) would probably enjoy playing too, and I wouldn't mind it if he and his friends joined us too.

Thanks!

Comment Re:Oh yeah (Score 1) 366

And to the gentleman above who did not believe that Scouting had military aspirations, look up the early history of Scouting - especially in the UK. It definitely was a pre-military (as opposed to para military) organization. The concept of being in uniform, being beholden to a chain of command, having a group purpose, being outside and physically fit was indeed to create future Bog-Fearing warfighters. Now the concept has morphed into something completely weird, but that tends to happen with big organizations.

If that was directed at me, yes I know that the original purpose (or one of, anyway) of the Boy Scouts was to ease a boy's transition into military life (that being in an era when boys would lie about their age to go fight a war at 14 years old, and serving your country in the event of war was practically a given), but that was 110 years ago. None of that exists today, for better or worse.

Comment Re:Don't you have more important things to do? (Score 1) 366

Really? This? Are you going to have a merit badge for going to the movies?

How about you work on some of those long standing issues like your discrimination against gays, and non-Christians?

Yeah, except they don't have any problem with gays or non-Christians. So, what was your argument again?

Comment Re:Oh yeah (Score 1) 366

Your scaremongering ignorance is astounding. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Assault rifles do NOT have "point-and-click interfaces". Have you ever held or fired one? To begin with, they're heavy. A child would not be able to hold one level, let alone steady. Pulling the bolt back to chamber a round requires more strength than most children have. The recoil would probably knock a smaller child down, and certainly scare the majority of children into dropping the weapon.

Do you honestly think children learn how to "sprint with 60 pounds of equipment"? Utterly ridiculous. Cub Scouts today do jack shit physically... they do little crafts, play nicey-nice, maybe do the occasional camp out. Boy Scouts will do marches occasionally during camp outs, during which they are supposed to spot and recover and litter in the woods or on trails, but they're not being "trained" for anything more than cleaning up nature and leaving a site in better condition than they found it. Yes, they are encouraged to be patriotic (and what is wrong with that?), but never in the 12 years that I've been involved in it through my sons have they done anything that could be considered PT or indoctrination. Hell, they barely move at all anymore, even at the Boy Scout level. When my oldest son was Senior Patrol Leader, he got the idea to punish unruly younger scouts with pushups. That was quickly put an end to, because the fat little kids couldn't do any and it "hurt their feelings". Yes, even the Boy Scouts are crippled by silly, counterproductive, and ultimately harmful Political Correctness.

There is a great deal of good that comes from scouting, but much like religion and capitalism, all the news ever reports is when something goes wrong, and a leader molests a kid or something. Believe me, that is the exception and not the rule, and with all the safeguards in place to prevent that from happening, a lot of people have to drop a lot of balls (no pun intended) before that takes place... not the least of whom is the parents.

The assertion that the Boy Scouts, let alone the Cub Scouts is some sort of paramilitary organization is just absurd, ignorant, fantastic, and patently incorrect. It's about keeping boys out of trouble, involved in something, and teaching them responsibility, leadership, and chivalry for lack of a better term. I know it's all "cool" right now to scoff at those traits, but I'm proud of my sons and scouting has certainly helped them grow into better people.

Oh, and since your post was rife with thinly-veiled disdain for our armed forces, remember this... whatever you think of the war that we are currently involved in, those armed forces are the same ones who are sworn to protect YOU and YOUR FAMILY if and when an enemy decides you're better off in the ground and our resources belong in their coffers. Even if you don't like them, they would protect you anyway.

Comment Re:The real question (Score 1) 428

Wow, modded up to +5 Informative for a post that suggests that "the assumption that anyone from the south deserves to be denigrated and disrespected automatically" is "correct"?!

Seriously people? Somebody care to let stupid me in on why? Is it because Family Guy says so, or what?

I'm up in the Boston area, by the way, so I have no real stake in defending the South... I just think double standards suck. And, FWIW, the last couple times I was in the South on business (Alabama and Texas), I met some of the smartest people I've ever had the pleasure of speaking with. An accent and dialect doesn't make one less intelligent, any more than the color of one's skin.

Comment Re:It's all about the fiber (Score 5, Insightful) 542

All fructose is processed by the liver in the same way as alcohol. That includes fruit juice.

All this changes in the presence of fiber. If you eat a piece of fresh fruit, the fiber in the fruit changes the way the fructose from the fruit is absorbed so it's not such a huge shock to the liver.

Fruit juice != fruit. Drinking a tall glass of orange juice is the equivalent of eating 6~8 oranges, but without the fibers. Your liver treats the massive sugar dump much differently than eating the equivalent # of [fruit].

The FDA wants to toss fruit juices into the same category of "bad" drinks as sugar laden sodas.

Exactly true, and yet millions of (nutritionally) uneducated mothers and/or fathers insist that their children drink plenty of juice (most of which is probably only 10% real fruit juice to begin with), instead of soda... because it's "healthy".

I won't go off on my usual rant about the terrible food pyramid we've been brainwashed with since the 60s ("eat a shitload of bread, but NO FATS!"), but the bigger problem I'm seeing every day is just an utter ignorance about what people put into their body, or an unwillingness to try something different.

"It says LEAN Cuisine on the box! That means I'll lose weight by eating it."

My dad taught me something when I was younger, probably without even meaning to... if you can't pronounce all the ingredients, you shouldn't eat it. Of course, as a kid, I ignored that advice and just ate whatever tasted good. My mother did her best, but she grew up in an Italian household, which means a lot of pasta and other starches. When she went back to work, the fridge was filled with microwaveable "food", that I could nuke whenever I thought I was hungry. Guess who was a fat kid who sucked at sports, couldn't keep up with friends when there was running, biking, climbing, or jumping was involved? Guess who grew up to be a fat adult who tried all the same shit (pills, "diet" meals, "magic" exercise apparatus, etc.) as many other fat people, with the same results... still fat.

It took a combination of a rough period in my life, combined with pure dumb luck... I was really low and, rather than drown myself in booze, I decided that I'd had enough, and that it was time to work on me. I got an email from a major men's magazine, offering a 30-day free trial of a book (which I've shilled on /. before), the title of which appealed to desire to be more of a man than I saw in the mirror at the time. The price of the book was less than a night at the local watering hole, so I went for it. When it arrived, first I thumbed through it. There was a lot of *common sense* stuff in there that just hadn't occurred to me before. So, I went back and READ it. Many an a-ha moment. Then I went back again and applied it. Now, at the risk of sounding like a braggart, I'm one of the most fit guys in the office. People are constantly asking for, and then either disregarding or outright refuting my advice. The result is, they're still fat, and I'm still not.

Bottom line is, there's no magic pill, there's no silver bullet, there's really no secret. Back in the caveman days, right up to a half century ago, you almost had to try to get fat. Now, the food manufacturers (think about that phrase for a moment) are pumping chemicals into their products to make them taste better, cheaper. When I was a kid, McDonald's was a once-in-a-while treat. Now it's considered by many to be a viable option for all three major meals. People get in their car and drive to the store a block away. Hell, I see parents put their kids in the van and drive TO THE END OF THE DRIVEWAY to wait for the bus. People would rather wait in their car for 20 minutes in the Dunkin' Donuts drive through than park, get out, and be in and out of the place in 2 minutes. Schools have dropped gym class to save money and make more time for standardized tests. My oldest son tells me they don't really do the President's Fitness Challenge like they did when I was a kid, and they've dropped the chin up test altogether, because too many kids can't do them. Hey, I couldn't do them when I was a kid... and I suffered the embarrassment every year. Know what? Tough shit on me... I should have worked at it, and I'd have been able to eventually. Kids don't play outside as much, if at all, because we have become paralyzed with fear of kidnappers and child molesters who were ALWAYS there, but just get noticed more now because of our instantaneous information society.

There, I've gone and started ranting. Anyways, we live in a world today where the deck is stacked against our collective health and fitness. That won't change until we make it. The corporations will continue feeding us meals made in a laboratory as long as we continue to buy them. It's harder to get and stay in shape and healthy than it used to be, but it's still possible, and it is STILL our responsibility. It's OUR responsibility to ourselves and to our children and to society as a whole. Nobody can or should do it for us. It's a bit of a challenge, but it's still very simple: Stay away from prepackaged foods... stick to the perimeter of the supermarket. Learn how to cook. Learn the difference between complex and simple carbohydrates, and "good" versus "bad" fats. Drink a lot of water, soda is not good for you. Move around more. Play with your kids outside, even if they don't want to... eventually they'll learn to appreciate the time that they get to spend with you instead of the Wii (and, no, the Wii is not exercise equipment, sorry). Above all, demonstrate a little, or a lot of, willpower! Show your kids what it's like to have a backbone and determination.

I'm sorry, I just get very passionate about this subject... not unlike when somebody becomes a Born Again Christian and starts trying to shove the Gospel down everybody's throat. Difference here, though, is many people complain about their being fat and don't know what to do about it... nobody complains about not being religious enough because if they want to be, they can just do it.

Slashdot Top Deals

Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny. -- Frank Hubbard

Working...