Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Recycling is Dying 1

HughPickens.com writes: Aaron C. Davis writes in the Washington Post that recycling, once a profitable business for cities and private employers alike, has become a money-sucking enterprise. Almost every recycling facility in the country is running in the red and recyclers say that more than 2,000 municipalities are paying to dispose of their recyclables instead of the other way around. “If people feel that recycling is important — and I think they do, increasingly — then we are talking about a nationwide crisis,” says David Steiner, chief executive of Waste Management, the nation’s largest recycler.

The problem with recylcing is that a storm of falling oil prices, a strong dollar and a weakened economy in China have sent prices for American recyclables plummeting worldwide. Trying to encourage conservation, progressive lawmakers and environmentalists have made matters worse. By pushing to increase recycling rates with bigger and bigger bins — while demanding almost no sorting by consumers — the recycling stream has become increasingly polluted and less valuable, imperiling the economics of the whole system. “We kind of got everyone thinking that recycling was free,” says Bill Moore. “It’s never really been free, and in fact, it’s getting more expensive.”

One big problem is that China doesn't want to buy our garbage anymore. In the past China had sent so many consumer goods to the United States that all the shipping containers were coming back empty. So US companies began stuffing the return-trip containers with recycled cardboard boxes, waste paper and other scrap. China could, in turn, harvest the raw materials. Everyone won. But China has launched "Operation Green Fence" — a policy to prohibit the import of unwashed post-consumer plastics and other "contaminated" waste shipments. In China, containerboard, a common packaging product from recycled American paper, is trading at just over $400 a metric ton, down from nearly $1,000 in 2010. China also needs less recycled newsprint; the last paper mill in Shanghai closed this year. "If the materials we are exporting are so contaminated that they are being rejected by those we sell to," says Valerie Androutsopoulos, "maybe it’s time to take another look at dual stream recycling."

Submission + - How fucked up Slashdot wanna be? (slashdot.org)

An anonymous reader writes: Dice is killing Slashdot

Right now we can't even click and get the stories that we want to read

For example, when I left click the story of Wikileaks on Sony's documents
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...
I got this
http://slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=sony

Motherfucking Dice can go eat shit and die !!

Submission + - Fintech - the oft forgotten tech sector (techcrunch.com)

Taco Cowboy writes: Goldman Sachs has over 9,000 engineers and programmers in its employment list — and the figure is higher than Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin

Massive amount of money is pouring into fintech. In 2014, global investment in financial technology startups spiked to more than $12 billion. That’s three times what it was just a year prior, according to Accenture. There have also been some huge funding wins this year. Most recently, zero-commissions trading app Robinhood announced $50 million round and financial education site NerdWallet attracted $64 million in funds

A booming fintech industry is incubating surrounding exchanges, hedge funds, banks and proprietary trading firms. But startups developing technology for trading and “markets” has been overshadowed by its consumer finance counterpart. They shouldn’t be

To demonstrate the opportunity in this space, the industry was recently the highlight of a sold-out, half-day event in Chicago. What was abundantly clear is that the trends that dominate technology – big data and networking, social media and app ecosystems – also dominate fintech startups

That’s because while other industries embrace the “fail fast” mentality, in financial markets and trading, fail fast thrives. The ROI of new innovations is often instantly quantifiable. When Anova Technologies built a laser and microwave infrastructure to carry data over airwaves between Chicago and Aurora, they knew the value of faster data – and so did all the trading firms that relied on being faster than everyone else. Once Anova demonstrated it could send data milliseconds faster, any firm whose competitive edge was speed had to subscribe

Other startups mine social networks to monitor for fast-breaking news from market influencers. Of the millions of people tweeting about stocks, Social Market Analytics identified a universe of 55,000 influencers, offering its tools to hedge funds and institutions to gauge market sentiment on which to base algorithmic trades

And then there are companies that are capitalizing on the app ecosystem. OptionsCity Software has launched a platform that is akin to the App Store for the trading world, where third-party developers or trading firms can sell risk management, pricing or analysis tools that plug directly into the trading system

This area is so ripe that the CME Group launched its own venture capital arm last year, Liquidity Ventures I LLC, to invest $500,000 to $5 million in startups that could help it develop new lines of business. Spanish bank BBVA, Fidelity and Bank of America have all created venture arms for increased investment in technology

Another reason to look at institutional fintech is that it proves its value very quickly whereas the jury is still out on consumer fintech, which has not yet seen tough times. Robinhood and Wealthfront have exploded, but so too have equity markets. If these consumer-focused companies existed in 2008 and 2009, would they have survived the massive exodus when consumers fled equity markets? How will they perform during the next bear market? At best, the answer is unclear

Financial markets are active, and banks, hedge funds and traders will need to make money no matter where the S&P 500 trades. Fintech startups in the trading space are still open to disruption, but aren’t subject to individual investors’ emotions. For that reason, this sector deserves closer attention


Submission + - The unintended consequences of Free Windows 10 for everyone (windows10update.com)

Ammalgam writes: Microsoft seems to be really driven to pushing over a billion people to the new Windows 10 platform as soon as humanly possible. In the latest push to make this happen, the company has basically decided that (somewhat off the record), pirates can come in the side door and it really doesn’t matter what the state of their Windows license is, they can get Windows 10 for free. To get deep into the weeds on how this is happening, you have to read Ed Bott’s excellent article on ZDNET – “With a nod and a wink, Microsoft gives away Windows 10 to anyone who asks”. However, on Windows10update.com, Onuora Amobi asks whether the cost benefit analysis has been done and if this deluge of new members will have a detrimental effect on the Windows Insider Program.

Submission + - Voat overloaded as people abandon Reddit .. (independent.co.uk)

nickweller writes: So many people are leaving Reddit that its closest competitor crashed and had to ask for donations to stay up.

Many users of the site protested and left when last week it banned five subreddits for harassment. And since, users have been making good on threats to leave the site — going instead to a Swiss clone of the site, Voat.

Submission + - President Obama's 'CS Teacher' on Disney Layoffs: 'H1Bs in CS rarely displace'

theodp writes: Last December, tech billionaire-backed Code.org teamed with Disney to teach President Obama to code, perhaps the capstone event of a Microsoft wished-for national K-12 CS and tech immigration "crisis". Just six months later, a NY Times report that Disney was making laid-off U.S. tech workers train their foreign H-1B replacements went viral, prompting journalist N.J. Connolly to tweet the news to Code.org CEO Hadi Partovi. "Were those CS majors or IT staff?," Partovi responded. "H1Bs in CS rarely displace." Partovi, like Lars Dalgaard and Joe Green, is also a supporter of FWD.us (a 'Major Contributor'), Mark Zuckerberg's H-1B visa-seeking PAC. Code.org has in the past tweeted its dismay (img) at the idea of an H-1B visa cap.

Submission + - Have Some Physicists Abandoned the Empirical Method? 2

HughPickens.com writes: Adam Frank and Marcelo Gleiser write in the NYT that two leading researchers, George Ellis and Joseph Silk, recently published a controversial piece called “Scientific Method: Defend the Integrity of Physics" that criticized a newfound willingness among some scientists to explicitly set aside the need for experimental confirmation of today’s most ambitious cosmic theories — so long as those theories are “sufficiently elegant and explanatory.” Whether or not you agree with them, Ellis and Silk have identified a mounting concern in fundamental physics: Today, our most ambitious science can seem at odds with the empirical methodology that has historically given physics its credibility:

Chief among the 'elegance will suffice' advocates are some string theorists. Because string theory is supposedly the 'only game in town' capable of unifying the four fundamental forces, they believe that it must contain a grain of truth even though it relies on extra dimensions that we can never observe. Some cosmologists, too, are seeking to abandon experimental verification of grand hypotheses that invoke imperceptible domains such as the kaleidoscopic multiverse (comprising myriad universes), the 'many worlds' version of quantum reality (in which observations spawn parallel branches of reality) and pre-Big Bang concepts. These unprovable hypotheses are quite different from those that relate directly to the real world and that are testable through observations — such as the standard model of particle physics and the existence of dark matter and dark energy. As we see it, theoretical physics risks becoming a no-man's-land between mathematics, physics and philosophy that does not truly meet the requirements of any.

Richard Dawid argues that physics, or at least parts of it, are about to enter an era of post-empirical science. "How are we to determine whether a theory is true if it cannot be validated experimentally ask Frank and Gleiser. "Are superstrings and the multiverse, painstakingly theorized by hundreds of brilliant scientists, anything more than modern-day epicycles?"

Comment End users can't upgrade software they didn't write (Score 2) 208

How about users of enterprise software, managed switches, Cisco gear, and embedded appliances for whom their shiny Windows 7/8/10 (for those corps that would run 8 or 10 - I'm sure they exist somewhere), Fedora 22, Mac OSX-latest still can't access said software, hardware, appliances? You do understand that I didn't write SuperMicro's Java interface and I'm not at will to upgrade to software that doesn't exist on something I didn't make regardless of how shiny my frakkin' operating system is, right?

You are correct, however about not being "forced" to do anything. What is going to happen is that when all of our stuff stops working on Chrome, we'll all use Internet Explorer because that's all that will work and IT will start enforcing it. Meaning I can count on the day where IT officially won't support my Linux laptop even though they turn a blind eye right now because I can operate without Windows. Same goes for my boss that runs a Mac.

It's a win for management who have been taking a political beating/PR hit for the move from Google Accounts for Domains (or whichever the enterprise suite is) to strictly Microsoft though. Which is a bit troubling since prior to acquisition there was hushed talk about the new management not being too keen on us in the R&D department using, writing and contributing to open source projects.

In summary, breaking an interface to other things breaks stuff on ALL supported platforms, because end users can't upgrade software they didn't write or compel their upstream provider to care what Chrome does; it doesn't matter what version of which operating system you're running. There are also unintended consequences for breaking stuff that corporate customers use, and those of us that have a foothold with Open Source in the company are collateral damage.

Comment No, give me a break. (Score 4, Interesting) 208

You did get the part where he's talking about using Java for work, in a secure environment, yes? You aren't seriously claiming that everyone that uses SuperMicro servers doesn't care about security because their IPMI interface is a Java webstart application, are you?

I mean, for my own part, I have two choices when doing hardware tests of our appliance builds: I can drive across the Twin Cities from my home office and stand at the R&D rack in a cold and noisy staging area for several kickstart/chef bootstrap/chef converge cycles. Conversely I, as a professional, can assume the risk of using a Java IPMI interface to access a server I physically took from a box and placed in the rack of a secured staging room over a secured subnet accessed over a secured VPN connection on my development VM (with a weekly maintenance snapshot, taken every Monday morning, which I don't hesitate reverting to 'cause SystemD, but that's another story), using HTTPS with the SSL cert from that box I physically placed in the rack.

If you are somehow cracking past all those barriers into the imaging subnet of our R&D department's subnet, you've already got half a dozen usernames and passwords and have changed a cert that lives on a box whose OS has an average lifespan on the order of an hour (that is, owning that box isn't incredibly useful in and of itself). Even at that point, the new SSL cert is going to tip me off. But if somehow you managed to get past all that, with all that knowledge just to infect my desktop VM, it seems to me that you already have the keys to the kingdom, so to speak.

That is all to say, just because someone has, or even chooses, to use Java doesn't mean they don't care about security. I'm sure I don't need to explain to you of all people (I read your username and it immediately rang a bell; a quick Google search confirmed my suspicion - I run a lot of code you wrote, and most likely vice versa but to a much lesser degree)that security is about defense in layers, attack surface, vectors and risk/reward. I'm sure there are plenty of other people that use Java in their professional lives that understand and accept the risk of how and where they use it.

Submission + - Quantum gravity will be just fine without string theory

StartsWithABang writes: It’s a difficult fact to accept: our two most fundamental theories that describe reality, General Relativity for gravitation and the Standard Model / Quantum Field Theory for the other three forces, are fundamentally incompatible with one another. When an electron moves through a double slit, for example, its gravitational field can’t move through both slits, at least not without a quantum theory of gravity. String Theory is often touted as the only game in town as far as formulating a quantum theory of gravity is concerned, but in fact there are five viable options, each with different pros, cons, and approaches to the problem. Many of them, in fact, have undergone significant developments in the past 5-10 years, something String Theory cannot claim.

Submission + - What asset tracking software do you recommend? 1

grahamsaa writes: I work for an organization that has a number of physical assets, as well as presence in multiple data centers. On the DC side, there are a number of specific things we need to track (one thing we want to be able to account for is how much power do we need for each rack). On the office side, our needs are more basic. We need to be able to tag and track laptops, workstations, monitors, etc.

I would like to use a single system for all of this, but have yet to find something that will work well on the office side and the data center side. Free / open source solutions are preferred, but we're prepared to spend money on a commercial solution if it meets our needs. What would you recommend?

Submission + - Cure for cancer one step closer after 'spectacular' breakthrough (newsweek.com)

schwit1 writes: The treatment, known as immunotherapy, uses the body's immune system to attack cancerous cells. Researchers say it could replace chemotherapy as the standard treatment for cancer within five years.

A series of studies show that the drugs are effective against some of the most deadly tumours, including those of the lung, bowel, liver and head.

Patients who could expect to live for just a matter of months under existing treatments, could see their tumours completely destroyed and go on to enjoy a normal lifespan under the new treatment.

Submission + - How Little It Cost Goldman To Bribe US Senators To Fast Track TPP Bill? (zerohedge.com)

schwit1 writes:
  • In just 24 hours, Wyden and five of those Democratic holdouts — Michael Bennet of Colorado, Dianne Feinstein of California, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Patty Murray of Washington, and Bill Nelson of Florida — caved and voted for fast-track.
  • Bennet, Murray, and Wyden — all running for re-election in 2016 — received $105,900 between the three of them. Bennet, who comes from the more purple state of Colorado, got $53,700 in corporate campaign donations between January and March 2015, according to Channing's research.
  • Almost 100% of the Republicans in the US Senate voted for fast-track — the only two non-votes on TPA were a Republican from Louisiana and a Republican from Alaska.
  • Senator Rob Portman of Ohio, who is the former US trade representative, has been one of the loudest proponents of the TPP. (In a comment to the Guardian Portman's office said: "Senator Portman is not a vocal proponent of TPP — he has said it's still being negotiated and if and when an agreement is reached he will review it carefully.") He received $119,700 from 14 different corporations between January and March, most of which comes from donations from Goldman Sachs ($70,600), Pfizer ($15,700), and Procter & Gamble ($12,900). Portman is expected to run against former Ohio governor Ted Strickland in 2016 in one of the most politically competitive states in the country.
  • Seven Republicans who voted "yea" to fast-track and are also running for re-election next year cleaned up between January and March. Senator Johnny Isakson of Georgia received $102,500 in corporate contributions. Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri, best known for proposing a Monsanto-written bill in 2013 that became known as the Monsanto Protection Act, received $77,900 — $13,500 of which came from Monsanto.
  • Arizona senator and former presidential candidate John McCain received $51,700 in the first quarter of 2015. Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina received $60,000 in corporate donations. Eighty-one-year-old senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who is running for his seventh Senate term, received $35,000. Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, who will be running for his first full six-year term in 2016, received $67,500 from pro-TPP corporations.

Slashdot Top Deals

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...