Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Fuck secure boot. (Score 1) 274

If you follow the money, it's actually about protecting IT from corporate users. No more, no less. You don't need a conspiracy to explain it when a billion dollar problem is staring you in the face.

Then why is Microsoft signing a "click OK to continue" shim that allows corporate users to install their own "untrusted" OS onto a system that only trusts the Microsoft key? Does MS have a more restrictive key that can be installed manually by IT departments? If so, could that be part of an evil plan to then get it onto generic vendor machines?

Comment Re:ARM Linux Netbook finally arrives? (Score 1) 230

Would you trust a vendor preinstall of a desktop linux distro? Standard practice for Windows power users is to put down a clean install of the OS over whatever the vendor preinstalled, for power users I'd be happy with doing this for GNU/Linux distros even when the system comes with some flavour of Linux-based OS.

ChromeOS provides a set-and-forget OS that avoids the Microsoft tax and works for the non-power-user. As long as there's a supported method of reinstalling an unsigned OS (previous iterations of Chromebook have had this, but it's always something to watch for), that should be suitable for the power user to reinstall over.

In the magical future when there's big commercial support for users on desktop GNU/Linux, then it will be important for vendors to preinstall a desktop-grade OS, but not now. ChromeOS devices should become cheaper and cheaper, not more and more powerful for the same price.

Comment Re:This is what Microsoft wants (Score 2) 244

This is actually a good point - Microsoft have gone through decades of pain being the target of malware, have suffered through it, and at this point have something of an immune system developed with Security Essentials and the ecosystem of third-party anti-malware. It's definitely an advantage over Apple, whether or not it's the best way to go.

The Courts

How the Inventors of Dragon Speech Recognition Technology Lost Everything 606

First time accepted submitter cjsm writes "James and Janet Baker were the inventors of Dragon Systems' speech recognition software, and after years of work, they created a multimillion dollar company. At the height of the tech boom, with investment offers rolling in, they turned to Goldman Sachs for financial advice. For a five million dollar fee, Goldman hooked them up with Lernout & Hauspie, the Belgium speech recognition company. After consultations with Goldman Sachs, the Bakers traded their company for $580 million in Lernout & Hauspie stock. But it turned out Lernout & Hauspie was involved in cooking their books and went bankrupt. Dragon was sold in a bankruptcy auction to Scansoft, and the Bakers lost everything. Goldman and Sachs itself had decided against investing in Lernout & Hauspie two years previous to this because they were lying about their Asian sales. The Bakers are suing for one billion dollars."

Comment Re:Hack your phone (Score 2) 145

Of course, there are issues of UK police forcing you to hand over the encription keys (they have a legal right to do that in UK).

What would be nice is an encryption setup mode where you have your password/authentication plus 4k of random data (like a big salt). When you set up the encryption or subsequently boot the system decrypted, it regenerates the random data and re-encrypts the internal final decryption key with your password+new random salt. When you shut the phone down normally, the salt is saved in cleartext and you're ready to go upon next boot, but if you yank the battery or shut down in "panic mode", the salt isn't saved and the phone is unrecoverable by you or anybody else. If you're worried about losing data, you could also have "saved salt" as the default mode, and the only way to render the device unusable would be to shut it down in some sort of "panic mode"

Comment Re:No more Unity 2D? (Score 5, Informative) 230

Unity3D will still be usable without GPU acceleration, it will use a new software implementation of OpenGL called llvmpipe. llvmpipe is a much better software rasteriser than we've traditionally had, but it's still software which means it's significantly slower than even the simplest of hardware OpenGL implementations.

Comment Re:The easy way (Score 5, Informative) 140

Even with the best of tools and setups, pure streaming is not always an option. My synology NAS barfs on .mp4s sometimes.

Your NAS doing DLNA is doing more than a NAS needs to. XBMC happily supports connecting to Samba or SFTP shares within the application, or you could just use NFS and attach the NAS share to the local filesystem. If a NAS cares about what type of file it's sending over a plain filesystem access protocol like that it's a broken NAS.

Comment Re:Regardless of THIS flaw (Score 1) 201

In addition to that if you have the static URL to the photo it persists after the photo has been deleted as well.

Well, that's to be expected when using a static cache - it's the only way DNS can manage, for example (DNS changes take a while to "propagate" through the Internet).

If the deleted content is still there a week or more later, then you've got problems.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Money is the root of all money." -- the moving finger

Working...