As far as insurance goes - you only need to have liability insurance. If you want to insure your car for theft and damages, that's voluntary - but being able to pay for damages caused by you isn't. And as Norway is a rather small country, rather than a federation of states, expect it to have information and powers that you'd usually think would would be separated by "federal" and "state". You get a sticker every year showing that the yearly road fee is paid, and that liability insurance is OK.

Wealth tax has some bad side effects - like most taxes - and fortunately, the new government is working towards removing it. However, the Norwegian tax system is in general more sane than the US system - lower rates and less loop holes - so it isn't all bad. And more importantly, Norway has a healthy budget surplus - the key to any sane tax cut.

The car must be registered and insured. Also, Norway has a wealth tax and you'd have to list it there. Of course, you could try to find a way around all of these but the harder you try, the more likely they'd get for money laundering etc. instead if they actually caught you.

Apple's Time Machine can use full disk encryption. You need a password/passphrase to be able to read from the disk later, which is rather useful. If someone steals my iMac and my onsite backup, they can not access any data - the system, as well as the backup, are both encrypted.

Verbing weirds language.

Mandela was removed from the US terrorist list in 2008. However, he had been able to travel in and out of the US the entire time - and had even received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from George Bush in 2002 - so this looks more like an oversight than anything else.

The reason is not the recoup the development costs - the reason is Price Discrimination: The ability to charge a different price in different markets. The optimal price for Windows in the US is much different than the optimal price for Windows in China - and if you can charge different prices here, Microsoft will make more money. Restricting language change is one mechanism to avoid Americans paying Chinese prices.

Churchill also said: "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."

True, but infrastructure(there wasn't any) and populations were a lot more flexible then. Right now, with the concepts of property, cities, countries the impact of a 4 m rise in sea level would be catastrophic.

Or don't see that this course of action actually will fix the problem, for a variety of reasons - even though they recognize that the evidence of AGW is overwhelming.

Speaking of evidence - it's always seemed rather odd to me that the ones most opposed to AGW, "because of lack of evidence", are the same people that are most likely to be passionately religious. These two positions are at the complete opposite ends of the "proven" scale.

Actually, while they often selected the best move, they also often selected a lower ranked possibility - e.g. 3 - 4. A computer won't do that. However, a computer won't blunder the way they did either. You can come quite far in chess if you never do a move that is shown to be a huge mistake in e.g. 5 moves for each side...

The new world champion is an interesting deviation here. The previous world champions have relied on extensive preparation - a main part of which is going through existing opening theory and finding weaknesses of the opponent, plus "new theory" - new ideas or moves from previously played opening positions. In some cases, these variations can go on for many moves - and a surprise there can topple an opponent. This requires extensive preparation and a requires a lot of memorisation.

Magnus Carlsen's trademark is to avoid most of these if possible - and get "out of the book" and into a position where the opponent must play, rather than base the game on memory, as early as possible. Of course, against a computer "the book" is so large - and keeps growing - that this will never happen. Eventually, you'll be playing against "the book" all of the time - the computer will follow successful games, and avoid blunders where they happened. Winning there, as a human, will be impossible.

Not likely an attractive option:

• Sweden is a rather expensive country - the standard of living, cost level etc. are higher than in the US
• Sweden focuses on treatment to avoid relapse into crime, rather than punishment for its own sake. Thus, the prisoners would be treated far too well for US' tastes.
• I'm sure Sweden would like to avoid any chance of US criminals ending up living in Sweden afterwards...

Or I don't play the same games you do - I don't play many FPSes, and the games used in benchmarks because they are the most demanding ones probably aren't available on the Mac. This is (Mac Pro excepted) the most powerful Mac ever released, so the "let's see what we can do with 2 780 GTX in SLI"-kind of games aren't what you'd be running here. They probably aren't even available.

The games I ran were Civ 5 (with all expansions) and XCom: Enemy Unknown. The latter stopped working after the Mavericks upgrade, as it now believes the computer doesn't satisfy the minimum requirements and needs a patch.

Windows 8.1 is just an update. The upgrade would be from Windows 7 to Windows 8, and for that you have to pay. Given their different business models - Apple has a comfortable margin on their hardware allowing this pricing model, while Microsoft lives from software sales - that's understandable. But the cost of this should be taken into consideration, just as virus scanners - Microsoft recommends not using the free security essentials. This decreases the cost difference over the life of a system.

First - this was not a review. This was list of impressions. For a review, I would need to compare it to something, go into technical details, measurements etc. This wasn't a review - and for what it was worth, I don't think the one in the original article was a good one either. I think this is a better example of a review, but it is of a different model. As of my use of "surprising", I used it twice. Once for the weight. Since I had just moved my old 27 inch iMac, I had a good comparison - and this was 1/3rd lighter for what is still basically a computer attached to a screen. Only the optical unit is really missing. This felt slightly surprising to my muscle memory. The second time was describing the sound, and my surprise there is that it is even coming close to "passable for some light use" given the speakers. This is hardly what Apple's marketing would aspire to ;) I would not consider using this without additional speakers.

As for "quantify" that time machine being fast - it was a couple of clicks. After that, it took an hour or two - it was about a terrabyte of data (mostly RAW images and music files). I didn't hang around to find out, but the involvement for me was "fast". As for "noiseless", it means I have a really hard time hearing that it's one - I have to put my ear to the screen.

As for "what you're getting at", you're wrong. I don't buy retail (there aren't even any Apple stores around here), and of course lower price is better. I just happen to look at what I get for my money rather than always choosing the lowest price, and previous experience (my own and people I trust) will have an influence on my decisions.