Comment This is where the ton for AC capacity comes from. (Score 4, Interesting) 83
One ton of AC is equivalent to what one ton of ice melting would provide over a day.
One ton of AC is equivalent to what one ton of ice melting would provide over a day.
You should be happy since NASA has paid for about 1/2 of SpaceX expenses so far. In fact NASA doesn't build much. The last A is for administration which is what it mostly does. Private contractors do the vast majority of the work. NASA just sets the goals and monitors the contracts. Some work is kept in house but most of that is so that there are people smart enough to manage the contracts.
I'll try one more time. They have shown they can land from a stable position in Texas. If they can show they can get from second stage separation to a similar configuration over a barge in the ocean then it's a success. If they can it will show they have good enough control that range safety will allow them to fly back to try to land on land.
Funny how you just throw the word profit out there without explaination. If your first statement is true that humans are brave and motivated by liberty and honor then the easiest way for corporations to make a profit is to sell people what they want. If humans were truely motivated by these ideals then corporations would be selling into that market.
You missed quoting the important part.
It doesn't really matter if they tip over over land too hard at sea.
As long as they show a good landing burn over the landing zone it doesn't matter if a pitching deck causes a landing failure.
The goal isn't to land on a barge, but back at the launch site (or at least near it). If they can show over a couple attempts that they get close to the target then they can move to doing this over land. They have already proven they can do this in Texas many times. It doesn't really matter if they tip over over land too hard at sea. What you don't want is that it missed by a mile or cartwheels out of control.
I think it was Milton Friedman who explained there are 4 ways to spend money.
1) Spend your own money on yourself.
You look for a compromise between cost and quality
2) Spend your own money on somebody else.
You look mostly for cost
3) Spend somebody else’s money on yourself.
You look mostly for quality
4) Spend somebody else’s money on somebody else.
You really don't care.
We all want to have a monopoly on what we do for a living. We want limited competitor and supply s and be able to charge high prices. As consumers we want unlimited choices, lots of supply, and low prices. A free market will provide the latter and a command economy is required for the former. What we have now is the worst of both. Those with political power use it to restrict start up and small competitors while trying to have unlimited supply of cheap labor.
It only takes one predator carrying a pregnant fish from one pond to another to eat it and having the eggs wash into the pond to start. I'm sure they take off pretty quick with no large fish predators in the water.
The difference is that this is the first compile and test of Orion and it costs a couple billion so don't mess up.
I think the original reason is that employee benefits are typically calculated over 40 hours. So after 40 hours the cost of the employee actually goes down to the employer.
In case anyone is interested.
http://www.ustream.tv/nasahdtv
Especially since those evil men were most likely raised by single women and educated in schools made up almost entirely of women.
If men's lives weren't disposable think how hard it would be to get things done or have wars.
This was a problem with the Air Force rocket not the NASA payload.
I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"