Even good coders make mistakes. There can be various reasons for this, maybe someone was suffering from insomnia the night before and their mental processing is slower. Maybe they were working on a part of a project and there are integration issues in their code between a part of the project that they were not as familiar with.
Not every issue in code can be found by peer review, and not every issue in code can be found by testing. A good team has a combination of good coders, good peer reviews, and good testing. You need all of that (and more) for a good project. Good coders are not everything. Nor should they have an ego about their code. A good coder should realize that everybody makes mistakes, even themselves.
EMI and Zenph are two different animals altogether. If I remember correctly EMI creates new music in the style of a composer based on a database of the composers work. The Zenph technique currently takes existing recordings of musicians, analyzes the music, and essentially turns that into a MIDI file. Hopefully when played on an acoustic instrument that's been modified to play MIDI the result sounds as close to the original as possible.
At the moment all it can do is recreate what has already been done. As for what they intend to do in the future, that sounds more like EMI. However, I suspect they're going for something that can play existing music that sounds like it was played by that artist and not new music that sounds like it was written by that artist.
As opposed to Mozart, who not only invented Classical music, but also music itself, starting with nothing more than the occasional, disjointed, a-harmonic noises that existed in the world before him.
I'm going to have to disagree with this statement. As much as I enjoy Mozart, he, like others before him built on those that came before.
Music from the Baroque period can be quite beautiful, and much of it was written before Mozart was born. For example, The Four Seasons (1723) by Antonio Vivalidi, Water Music (1717) by George Frideric Handel, and Brandenburg Concertos (1721) by J. S. Bach. Each of these was composed before Mozart was born in 1756.
This would be similar to how a free diver's lungs get compressed as they dive. The pressure is transmitted through the skin, muscle, bone, hits the lungs which are mostly gas and are compressed.
Yes, I'm sure it'll be nice for the fish and a few extreme divers
If the Oriskany (200ft max depth) ans Spiegel Grove(134 ft max depth) are any indication then more than just extreme divers will dive this. At the bottom both of these wrecks are below the recreational dive limit of 130 ft, but the top of the Spiegel Grove sits just around 60-70ft as does the top of the Oriskany. This is well within the depth limits for recreational diving and I understand that there is quite a bit to see in these wrecks above 130ft.
I'm curious about the engineering reasons for using one really big chute instead of a cluster of smaller ones as on the Apollo command module.
I might have read this wrong, but I read it as a 3 stage system, pilot chute to pull out the drogue, drogue chute, and then a cluster of 3 main chutes.
Go to the movies. you will see plenty of full frontal nudity of women in R rated movies. You won't get a single shot of a penis until you go to X.
While I agree that there is something of a double standard here, I can think of several movies containing full frontal male nudity that were not rated X. For example "Any Given Sunday", "Life of Brian", "Schindler's List", and "The Crying Game" all contain full frontal male nudity. While it may not be common, it's not exactly unheard of.
Work is the crab grass in the lawn of life. -- Schulz