It does to you, since you are used to it. To me it makes sense this way. The 100 coefficient is just used to make the numbers "nicer", nothing else.

Anyway, l/100 km is not about fuel efficiency, it is about fuel consumption. It says that if you plan to go Y km, you need to have Y liters of fuel.

Saying one way makes sense and the other not is like saying that period makes more sense then frequency.

We don't actually measure fuel consumption in km/l in Europe. Writing 98 km/l is even less informative then 230 mpg :). But thanks for the effort anyway.

There, fixed that for you.

If they did it consciously, then I am sure they have two versions of the pages -- one standards compliant for compliant browsers and one for IE6. Now they only need to drop the IE6 version and think what to do with the free time they gained by not having to maintain it anymore.

Ideal for developers who work on huge projects. You can put all your .o files and the compiled binary on the RAM disk and the compilation/linking performance should be marvelous. And if there is a power failure, you can always just recompile everything. I will seriously consider getting one of these...