Good luck using a portrait monitor to look at spreadsheets - it'd drive you mad by the end of the day.

I take it the algorithm looks something like this:

If EMPLOYEE WEBSURFING equals EMPLOYMENT WEBSITE then output "Employee is thinking of leaving" else output "All good, nothing to see here"?

That was one of the more interesting articles I've read on women in CS in a long while - someone mod it informative!

Perhaps a longitudinal study would help - pick a group of kids (both genders), ask every year or so 'what do you want to be when you grow up? Why'. Or even just a list of possible careers, and ask them to say why they would / wouldn't do it.

It would take a few years to get a result, but at least you'd get a clearer answer.

Has anyone, you know, *asked* women why they don't go into CS?

Once again, everyone forgets WA (then again, we are perfect...)

Shhh, stop using logic! By spell checker, I meant "brain". Would it hurt the editors to use their brains?

Astroid: "An astroid is a particular mathematical curve: a hypocycloid with four cusps. Astroids are also superellipses: all astroids are scaled versions of the curve specified by the equation".

How, pray tell, are we going to mine one of those? Would it really kill the editors to run things through a spell checker? Would it, really?

I have no mod points, but bravo sir, bravo :)