Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:People need to start with the scale (Score 1) 392

Question:

Instead of turning around at the halfway point and using the same thrust to decelerate, would it be possible to, theoretically, initiate an explosion in front of the craft, equal in yield to the amount of thrust used to achieve whatever speed your craft is at when you need to start accelerating? Kind of like the old police trick of pulling in front of a speeding car and using the police cruiser to slow it (but with a BOOM instead of brakes, obviously).

Only if you want everyone squashed to a jelly. The point behind the continuous acceleration, flip, and continuous deceleration is to provide a 1G environment so that the passengers/crew experience Earth normal gravity. Coasting along and slowing down with an explosion means years in a zero G environment followed by a gargantuan deceleration. Whatever bones remained within the passengers and crew would be snapped like twigs.

Comment Re:Sure, but... (Score 1) 392

Sending people offworld to relieve population growth will never work*. The maximum volume of space that you can cover in a particular span of time is a sphere with a radius of ct (where c=speed of light, and t is time). The volume of the sphere varies as the time cubed. However, population growth is exponential over time. Exponential growth always exceeds geometric growth at some point.

Unless you're shipping off one entire gender.

Comment Re:Because Hollywood. (Score 1) 544

... it's tradition like the ST Enterprise whoosh sound as it travels superluminal speeds.

That's different. Variations in the warp field induce currents in the audio circuitry of the camera - producing the "sound". Everybody knows sound itself doesn't travel in a vacuum. You're hearing a side effect, like phantom pain in an amputated limb.

Comment Re:Lies (Score 3, Insightful) 544

This.

Definitely one of those "never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence" situations.

Editor see car, cars make noise, thus, editor add car noise. No conspiracy necessary.

I would hope that an editor for a NEWS SERVICE would have more sense than that. Altering levels, filtering noises, tweaking, balancing yes, but going to a library of sound effects and overlaying foreign audio and sound effects? I would hope they would only do that under orders from above.

Comment Re:Because Hollywood. (Score 1) 544

The editors who put in car-related audio on all manner of film media are morons, plain and simple.

I mean, these are the same guys that pipe in 'tires screeching on pavement' sounds every time the Duke boys take off, even when they're on gravel or dirt.

Frankly, I'd be far more surprised if they didn't add a bunch of fake engine noises.

I can see that for fiction shows, but 60 Minutes is a documentary. I would hope that an agency of that calibre (a) wouldn't add sound effects to video and (b) wouldn't hire morons.

Comment Re:The nanny state continues (Score 1) 518

I don't understand rear view cameras... well not the cameras, but the placement of the display screen. When you are backing up, you are supposed to be looking out of the rear window. That would place the dash-mounted display "behind" you. Can you get rear-view cameras where the display is aft of the driver's seat and facing forward so that you can see it when you are backing up?

Slashdot Top Deals

"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai

Working...