Comment Re:Voyager 1 and 2 (Score 1) 403
"The universe is nothing but one big pinball machine. Luck runs out eventually." geekmux
Should be added to the quote DB
"The universe is nothing but one big pinball machine. Luck runs out eventually." geekmux
Should be added to the quote DB
$120 a year and it's a needless cost for anyone trying to get into gamedev. The pay-when-you-make-it approach of UE4 and Unity is much easier to stomach when you're new.
True. But the answer to
If you're a developer, is it still worth paying for a game engine?
Is equally simple.
If it benefit you more / give better results / save time which out-weights the price then sure it is.
Kinda pay full price for the e-books you borrow.
Which kinda suck since when I borrow books in general I never read shit from them.
I can't understand how that's supported / accepted.
I wonder what this cost in the US.
Yeah, isn't this the pong level?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Though we may still be about there but with better graphics.
Then again maybe that could be said about the gaming industry in general beyond MMOs
But a double big mac has more nutrients than a soda at least
Even the french fries do.
The "diet" anything or aspartame?
While aspartame isn't supposed to taste just the same as sugar it's usually used with acesulfame k and that's supposed to taste similar.
Personally I've eaten lots of it and I don't notice any weird taste.
I know saccharin and cyclamate has been considered worse for longer and that there's taste issues with those but I always see this damn comment about aspartame sweetened things but for obvious reasons normally from people who don't consume these products.
But is it really about aspartame or is it about some other sweetener and these people just haven't tasted enough things to have a good opinion and is just bunching it all together?
And if so is it worth a 5: insightful?
https://www.flashback.org/t255...
iOS Ãr apple fÃr folk som inte vet vad apple Ãr...
Har och anvÃnder idag.
Imac 27"
MBPr 15"
iPad Air 2 <-- skrÃp
Iphone 5 <-- skrÃp
Google Nexus 6
OSX Ãr apple fÃr mig.
He/she claim iOS is for people who don't know what Apple is and says he/she think that OS X is Apple for him/her.
But that's not the important part, the important part is what he/she uses today.
Imac 27"
MBPr 15"
iPad Air 2 <-- trash
Iphone 5 <-- trash
Google Nexus 6
The original post ask where Apple is headed today since the person feel the quality has dropped. He/she talks about the Macbook Air though. Which is a cheaper laptop.
Care to tell about it for one pretty uninformed individual?
I don't know much about TPM and new hardware encryption thingy (for DRM?)
You don't need to take it anywhere.
Also the tablet doesn't need to be for you.
I don't remember what the point was but maybe it was it wasn't such competitive and awesome stick for $150 at all considering there existed tables with similar specs in that area.
If the tablet are cheaper and one could turn of the screen then I guess why not.
.. oh, and it's also $40 cheaper.
Jack the price up $40 more and maybe you can get your full 2 GB of RAM.
To be fair it should be compared to the Ubuntu one at $100. It's $10 more than that and has a screen
Then again I put no effort into it except googling up the very first hit to see if there was anything to what he said or not.
but realistically, where else are you going to get a $99 general purpose desktop computer that you can put in your pocket and carry around?
Uhm, his post started out with pointing out the tablets..
They even work as "general purpose computers" (where did desktop happen?) to a larger degree because they also have SCREENS.
How often do you need to take your "TV-computer" in your pocket?
And why won't a tablet do there?
And why is a cable such an horror?
Challende accepted:
http://www.amazon.com/Dragon-T...
First hit, $110 with micro-HDMI.
And as he said with screen "1280x800 IPS", just 1 GB of RAM but on the other hand also two cameras.
Anything more you want me to Google for you?
Proof and proof.
I just ask why.
You seem to suggest whatever IO/s value they mention won't be there longer / in reality / whatever.
But you don't say why and I have no fucking clue why that would be the case so I'm just curious / wonder why.
Ok, so maybe they do have some cache then? I guess if it was writes it could had been the OS which held the writes in RAM for some time. For reads that would possibly had been harder.
Then again if it was numbers from the manufacturer I guess one would had wanted to see them from the drive itself.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.