Comment Yeah it's a good trick (Score 1) 843
It's just trickery to keep the Chinese back.
"Here. Look at our latest fighter plan plans! This is going to be the shit! Why don't you make a bunch of these suckers?"
It's just trickery to keep the Chinese back.
"Here. Look at our latest fighter plan plans! This is going to be the shit! Why don't you make a bunch of these suckers?"
It's not too late for a single CPU/GPU package to completely change the playing field.
I think Intel say something like their integrated graphics is like 75 times more capable than their first one or whatever.
(I'm not comparing Intel and AMD here. Just stating how things have moved. There's of course the fact that Nvidia invest into Nvidia Grid, cloud rendering and streaming even games to consumers instead.)
It's all about what you need though. Integrated stuff is enough for many. But not for everyone. And streaming games will likely be the same.
But yeah. Who knows how many purchase graphics cards in the future.
The problem is, following this logic they should have used Nvidia GPU parts as well. This showcases AMD's weaknesses more than anything else. Its confirmation of what everyone already knows, AMD cant make low heat parts.
The Fury X is quicker than the GTX 980 and in half of the games seem to be quicker than the Titan X it seems:
http://www.tomshardware.com/re...
So why the fuck would they use an Nvidia card if they got as quick card themselves?
I know it may not support feature level 12.1 of Direct X but that's it. One advantage is that it will allow you to get a cheaper FreeSync monitor.
I guess nobody here at
Maybe.
Their Piledriver processors was mostly released in 2012-2014. It's three years old by now.
Zen won't be here until 2016.
I have no idea whatever they intend to do the SMT ("hyper-threading") with the same number of cores or not but the IPC / clock is supposed to be 40% quicker.
If you take one of their 8 core chips and make it 40% quicker and then added SMT on top of that maybe it would be somewhat competitive.
Skylake which Intel releases real soon is supposed to be 15% faster / clock than current Haswell. And that's supposed to be a large step.
They had Cannondale in 10 nm planned for the next year but it won't happen then.
So yeah, 6700K will be slightly better than 4790K and by 2016 Intel will do another tock for a tick-tock-tock but AMD may be competitive.
Also the FX-8350 and such isn't all too bad relative the 4790K. _BUT IT IS FOR GAMING_.
I assume part of that is due to not multi-threaded well enough games and maybe to a higher degree that DirectX and OpenGL had the CPU overhead it has and don't spread over the CPU cores. When it does. Which is next month. The AMD processors will likely gain some relative Intel for DX12 titles.
So yeah. Just because they aren't competitive for gaming now doesn't mean that will always be the case.
Seem like the plan is for AMD to go 14 nm in 2016. That's not 10. But then again as said Intel won't reach 10 nm in 2016 either.
The text I read seemed to even question whatever they would do it in 2017.
And nothing has happaned in 20 years time
Of course none will have completely perfected it when they launch and there will be many competitors.
But at least they all think it's relevant since they try.
So write "wide fucking gigantic movie screen" instead then.
And leave out the IMAX brand.
That got to be much better for them?
At least cash is just for criminals. I feel. I don't need them.
After all, if more players all over the developing world can access these games, we could see an uplift in the quality of play at the highest tournament level sometime down the line.
GO INSIDE!
I post shit on the Internet the whole time.
My brain isn't used all that much and English isn't my native language so occasionally my mind and fingers don't type the same thing.
Oh well.
Guess some humans consider their value as dangerous, powerful, exotic and amazing species so high they are worth to keep around even though they are dangerous to us =P
Being unique and diversification is also values
Oh well. I'd rather get rid of lots of humans
Ok. I go with the one I know / could think of first hand:
http://www.mosquitoreviews.com...
I guess another obvious one is as bird feed. Another less obvious one as wasp feed.
http://www.wbrcouncil.org/Depa...
http://www.motherearthnews.com...
There's not just one kind of bees and they don't all pollinate the same stuff.
You mean all bees / all pollinators? Good day for those who don't need them I guess
Ok all your guys.
I'll give you one chance:
But mosquitos have no benefits.
[citation needed]
Mosquitoes are genuinely useless.
I'm sure the world feels the same about you too.
On a subjective scale from all the species of the planet if they where well-informed enough I think we'd be considered the worst for lots of them.
Not rats and possibly dogs =P
Bees.
Only if you assume the loss of something is worth anything.
Various bees polinate various flowers and trees but remove one and even if some flowers and tress wouldn't be polinated others would take advantage of the loss.
But I guess it's correct in the way if finite consequences for others. Maybe no species depend on mosquitos only. What about the diseases they spread? But I guess that's what one usually want to stop anyway.
FORTRAN is not a flower but a weed -- it is hardy, occasionally blooms, and grows in every computer. -- A.J. Perlis
