Alternatively, his post suggests that be believes Zimbabwe has infrastructure problems, and you are the one bringing up racism.
The phrase "get your mind out of the gutter" comes to mind...
There is so much wrong here, it's hard to know where to even start... oh wait, you nicely numbered it. Sweet.
1) Bullshit, blood tests are accurate while breath tests are all across the board in terms of accuracy. If you think you are under the limit, always go with the blood test because the breathalyser is more likely to screw you.
2) Urban myth. Everyone and their mother has a breathalyser cheat method.
3) If the cop thinks you are purposely delaying, you're screwed. Furthermore, admitting *anything* to a police officer is always a retarded idea. Save it for the judge, nothing you can say to a police officer can improve your situation.
4) Women get more intoxicated for the same volume of alcohol. BAC tests don't have a sex bias, drinking does.
The joke is that they had to "pull the power / reboot" it, in a sense.
Lighten up dude.
I suspect he is wondering why he can't use multiple controllers all at once.
Of course the answer is probably again: "bad design".
The difference is DPI. TVs are massive because they're meant to be viewed from a distance by several people at once, while monitors tend to much smaller, and more suitable for reading text at non-eye-straining distances.
Are racecar drivers better at going fast than kids on tricycles?
Mmm, yeah, niggard me harder, you filthy nigger you!
Whether or not you agree with the conclusions wikileaks came up with from the video, it's pretty undeniable that the soldiers involved were having a grand time.
Begging a dying man to go for a weapon so he could be finished off is sick.
Try watching the "Collateral Murder" video, and tell me those guys weren't enjoying themselves.
It will be like when you forget to wax your nice sportscar, and the elements strip off the nice red shine.
Luckily the core is pretty absurdly massive. It's not going to suddenly lose all of it's kinetic energy without dumping it somewhere, a process which undoubtedly would be pretty impressive and noticeable.
Also, that movie was terrible.
The only reason you would ever run foul of this is if you were sending out unsolicited commercial email... SPAM!
In that case, fuck you. I have no sympathy.
Signatures don't transfer liability to the consumer.
Therefore, far less laughable. The only reason I use a credit-card is because they remove liability from myself.
Not saying it is correct, but wikipedia suggests that the pin is verified by the card.
Even with the assumption that the scheme is secure (a bad assumption) automatically making the consumer liable for PIN transactions on a credit-card is a pretty lame idea. We already know from ATM skimmers that PINs are quite easy for fraudsters to acquire. I don't see why credit-cards would ever be desirable over debit-cards with this scheme and law.
I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato
