to have design flaws one would need design process in the first place. for number of years already I mostly see coding without design.

I do not want to split hairs but there is a significant difference between I am not eligible because US gov. did not allow me (Porto Rico, District of Columbia etc) and I am not eligible because I could not be bothered to migrate to the greatest country in the world.You are an insensitive clod!

The really interesting part is this: if all that in the study is true then one can imagine a device that determines your voting preferences automatically. I can even imagine making similar scans early in the childhood (as soon as that is technically possible - I would imagine early teens is already good enough). Make an implant or something not easilly removable and you do not even have to go trough all the trouble of visiting polling station anymore. Optimizing it further I can imagine that your preference can be noted in a voting register (together with some other preferences deduced from the scans) and use them whenever an election or some other silly routine is started. When technology is advanced enough we can even put some people (rated dangerous or not very useful for society) on the way trough the chimney with a single and simple database query although that may require some amendments to currently existing laws in some jurisdictions.

in my rational view your 'rational' view is just irrational. Your post as AC so I cannot be sure but most of people using similar arhuments (although not all) are irrational bigots.

ot as it is: your judgement of first language may be correct ut based on flawed argument of one badly used word which more likely than not was a typo and not conscious usage.

It was mujahedin in Afghanistan and it all well relatively well. At least Ruskis went back home. In Iraq it was a magnitude bigger fuckup than in Afghanistan and it looks like it will take a while to bring it back to the 'acceptable' level. It is also closer to the Western world. I am waiting in excitement where is the next place US is going to 'help'. I guess this may be Ukraine - it is again a bit closer to center of civilization and although the opponent lacks jihadist credentials it has a friend with nukes just across a border. I know that I am now a thankless bastard and apparent Putin's shill but I would prefer if US military tried to help Canada or Mexico. I am sure there are enough targets in these two countries to keep the boys and girls busy for a while.

I think it is Putin's dick out there and CIA says it is small. Now I know what all the quzillions of tallars or whatever they call the funny money of today are going into. I also know now that our dicks are bigger than Russian, whatever interpretation of this sentence you take it must be correct!

I think this is yet another proof how devious and barbaric Russian regime really is. We cannot allow Putin to do such things like putting (???) a satellites in orbit and doing maneuvering with them. Only one country on earth is allowed to do such things. If we allow Russia commit acts of such treachery all sorts of bad things may happen or even Klingons may materialize in orbit!!!!

You mean that Apple does not see any business benefit in selling customer data? I suppose you maybe true as considering its history the company prefers to use such data itself I suppose. So in some sense you have a point. I still consider the comment, that I was responding to, funny. Not because I dislike Apple in any special way but I dislike corporations. They may be necessary to support our wasteful way of life but I still dislike them all and trust them to do terrible things as long as the bosses think this brings them profit and they can get away with negative consequences if any.

why is parent not modded funny?

forcing works better then superior solution, thank you

if TEH bomb is big enough, then it does not matter whether the order is in an understandable form or not.

only two? All of them should be sacrificed!

and they were dying like flies for millennia too. we have arranged and are paying for these services to help us out when need be. Some of those things that happen (fire or stroke) can kill or maim if not dealt with fast. This said it is indeed true that you need to accept that accidents happen also to such emergency centers. You can also expect that in this day and age such centers are handled in a way assuring redundancy. There many things that failed apparently. This is an occasion to improve. For some it is occasion to course and blame game (Putin would be a nice candidate to blame). For you this is just a statement of surprise why others are so shocked.

Sir you are damned naive. We have no money for shit like reason and qa. potentially shippable product will be shipped as soon as it compiles and sometimes even without fulfilling this requirement. Actually in a project I work for we reached release and discuss happily faults on a fault list while a customer on which our industrial application got installed for testing gave us another very short but not empty list with faults that it sees as a show stoppers. The lists do not overlap on any single point. Which of the lists would you start discussing at the release meeting? Yes bravo - the ones on the little problems list. I actually had some designers denying that the customer list existed, that the faults on the list existed and one stubborn guy claimed that the problems on the list have been fixed albeit question about how that was verified was left without answer. The funny thing is - 2 of these faults I have seen before even the preliminary software version our customer got was packaged. Now you say this is anecdotal and has no bearing on wider production practice - I dare to differ on that based on experience I had over last 10y.

I agree with you at least as far as to say that if need be such considerations have to be made at some point during development. Often enough they are not because people live their fantasy of craftsmanship or being an artisan doing some fancy stuff where hard rules of reality do not apply.

In other words: there are no requirements in the jungle. There is only you and your agile team in search of holy Grail of software development practice (BTW: I think agile manifesto is actually nicely organized set of principles of what is important but none of the agilists I worked for over the years, did actually read it).