Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:How about reduce their hours by 20% instead... (Score 0) 284

Sheesh, if my job sucked badly enough I contemplated suicide, I doubt even a 20% raise would fix it.

Even a 20% raise and fewer hours may not turn this from living hell into a "nice job in the big city."

Raising the labor from 2.3% to 3.0% means what, $3.50 on the "cheap" iPad and $5.90 on the best one.

Maybe they can have an extra option at checkout, "would you like to pay a living wage, so nobody has to die over your new toy?"

Comment Re:4G? (Score 0) 283

I'm in the US, in a somewhat outlying suburb but certainly not in the "country," and still waiting for 3G at home. Verizon seems to have 3G coverage here (I will not use them), AT&T's 3G is very spotty, while T-Mobile and Sprint have no 3G coverage here. How about bringing the networks up to date before hyping the crap out of the next technology?

Sorry brother, the grass here "in the big city" ain't much greener. It seems the MobiTelCos have figured out exactly what you lament, that marketing sells, and crap service and coverage doesn't un-sell enough to mitigate it.

Too few of us are willing to pay for superior quality... Hypothetically, if Sprint's new-fangled 4G network were actually way better, but cost three times as much, how many of us would jump over to them? Not many :( And making it as nice as you and I want would likely more than triple the price, so even fewer people would go for it.

Comment Re:Well for starters (Score 0) 517

You miss my point.

If it was illegal income then it would be confiscated completely under asset forfeiture.

Then again, that might be a good incentive for illegals not to come here, if we could confiscate their earnings in addition to deporting them.

Subject to forfeiture, maybe. But it's probably not much money, much of it was already spent or sent home, and there are thresholds below which it doesn't make sense to apply the law. I.e. it costs more to do the paperwork than it's worth.

It sounds as though you're arguing, "if it's a crime, it gets punished. Therefore if it doesn't get punished, it must not have been a crime." Sadly, most violations go unpunished, and sometimes that leads to folks mistaking "lack of enforcement" with "lack of crime."

Classic example is illegal downloading of copyrighted material. Just 'cuz you don't get caught, doesn't mean it isn't a crime. Or speeding (which isn't a "crime" per se, but it is a minimally-enforced violation).

Comment Re:Well for starters (Score 0) 517

And this tax is tracked how online? On ebay, for example, is ebay required to collect this tax? or the seller? or does the buyer just record all their purchases and pay up at the end of the year? I'm all for a national sales tax, but it still requires tracking of individuals.

It's not a sales tax, but an income tax. ebay and cl would just be required to report the earnings via 1099, just like your bank does with the interest you earn. It's up to you to pay the IRS.

If you fail to report it, and the amounts are large enough, the IRS will let you know. Even if the amounts are small, the IRS will subtract what you owe from you next refund or send a bill, or both.

Nothing to see here folks, this is how it works. $20,000 is a pretty generous limit. "Regular" businesses are on the hook for profits from dollar one. Ask anyone who's

Ask anyone who's won more than a grand or two at a casino. They often ask for your info before paying out from slots, and in some cases before cashing out chips.

Comment Re:Well for starters (Score 0) 517

Illegal immigrants can earn legal income, legal in the sense that they get to keep the money sans taxes.

Illegal income would be drug money and the like.

But if you're not here on a valid work visa, then you're not legally authorized to work, period. Any job you get would therefore be generating "illegal income." And they get to "keep" the money because 1.) they aren't filing tax returns, so the IRS has nothing to go on, and 2.) they probably aren't making much money, meaning the IRS probably wouldn't bother if they knew...

Comment Re:2000 m^3 per person per year?!? That's a lot! (Score 0) 386

I just looked at my water usage for the past year, and it's about 32000 US gallons.

Your water bill is unlikely to include the water used to produce your paper water bill, or the electricity with which you illuminated said paper, etc. etc. While at the individual level, we don't really have an easy way to calculate this, at the nation/state level, we do. And apparently China is f-ed. As is California, and most of Africa. And, I know easy != accurate, so the debate rages on...

Comment Re:Cencorship, etc (Score 0) 374

2 copies of the same picture of the same abuse does not mean more abuse than 1 copy of the picture of that abuse.

or do we need to spell everything out using small words and simple sentence.

Not true. Having the same image or image available more than once increases its availability. For rare, quasi-hard-to-find contraband, increasing redundant supply increases likelihood that consumers will be able to find it. Conversely, decreasing redundant supply makes it harder to find. It is well documented that demand for child porn (from viewers) encourages production of new, fresh child porn (by child molesters). So yes, creating a wider audience by making it more available leads to "more" new abuse.

Slashdot Top Deals

You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken

Working...