He might mean the relative speed of rendering between chrome and firefox? Not sure.

Care to enlighten us, then?

I laughed.

++ Mod Up, if I could.

That being said, they're not fearmongering his name. At least, no reputable political figure uses it much any more. These days most of the discussion seems rather eggheaded, to me. Which is good.

Actually, there's one way that your theory works. Set fertilizer = 0.

Whoosh.

I laughed.

Not to be a heretic, but, wouldn't you rather a company like Amazon hold the patent than some random patent troll? In the current climate, I could see them patenting some kind of similar (bullshit), charging a nominal fee to license the patent, and everyone's happy. (As compared to some patent troll getting their hands on the patent and suing God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost for infringing on their "triune divinity" patent.) As mentioned by a previous poster, btw, this method has been in use for years. Like, hundreds. Canary Trap. Wiki.

Ah, apologies. This is sarcasm done right. Subtle, almost impossible to call out as cruel, and anonymous. Good work, mother fucker.

What the story fails to mention is the 254 other blind men who failed to successfully navigate the maze. Go statistics!

• HP gaming computers are dead.
• Bob is dead.
• Bob is an HP gaming computer.

Would be a nice summation of your logic.

You quoted _a_ logical fallacy, but not the correct logical fallacy.

You quoted the fallacy of non-sequitor (it does not follow).

You should have quoted the fallacy of _composition_.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_(logical_fallacy)

To recap:

• HP gaming rigs are dead.
• The group "gaming pcs" contains "HP gaming rigs".
• Therefore, gaming pcs are dead.

• "A fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part)."
  
  http://xkcd.com/386/