> 4 stars...

Isn't a contested patent that is found to be invalid "public domain" by definition?

And if the lawsuit failed because the company in question solved the problem in a different fashion, then why would the patent go into the public domain? It may still be valid.

They need to mix Half-Life 3 and Portal 3 with a great story. THAT would be an amazing game.

Of course it does. I can pick a random 24-character password for every website just by leaving the defaults on LastPass.

Exactly this. A programmer that fights "human nature" is doomed, no matter how good the software is.

Then I get on my phone and type in those 36 characters by hand.

Well, at least its a minor vendor like NVidia. Shouldn't be too many people. 76% market share?!? Then yeah, I guess they should have this nailed 3 days before release.

I only use the NVidia drivers and they work perfectly on Windows 7.

Just like Balaam's donkey had a voice box? Or can a spirit possess an animal and cause it to speak?

Science is questionable when the science actually proves a young earth instead of an old one.

Science is questionable when political votes are taken to decide things like the death of the dinosaurs or the Oort Cloud, instead of additional evidence.

Science is questionable when people's repeatable experiments are excluded from the conversation because of who they are rather than the repeatability and quality of the experiments themselves.

Nice try. Thanks for playing. But instead of straw men that they don't actually believe in, here is their own statement of their top 10 beliefs about creation:

https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/the-10-best-evidences-from-science-that-confirm-a-young-earth/

In that case, you should be happy that creationists are questioning everything. In fact, it sounds like you would favor any repeatable scientific experiments they can perform should be taught in school.

Actually, this is a more correct statement than most people make on this subject. Both creationists and evolutionists have made wild guesses in the past that have turned out to be absolutely false. The lack of hard scientific data makes this field less scientific than most people realize.

Yep. This is EXACTLY how they date fossils 90+% of the time. And you believe it as if they did a test or something actually scientific.

But not because they don't contain Carbon-14. Everything contains Carbon-14 and most fossils date to around 25,000-30,000 years ago if you Carbon-14 date them.