Injury
We both woke up around seven, still cuddled up on the couch. We'd been asleep for fifteen hours on that thing. We cuddled a little while more, then Destiny started coffee while I took care of the ship's air and corrected the course, since I was sleeping when the generator came back online.
We took another shower together after drinking a little coffee and she told the cook to make pancakes and sausage, and we watche
Since they have no intention of actual using the service, then it's fraud.
No one knows that. It's a idea in 1(one) paper. Just like dozens of other solutions.
BTW, pouring them 'in place' brings up a whole new set of problems.
Mostly the propaganda comes from the private sector rather than our government. For example, health insurance companies have Americans (or at least the stupid ones) convinced that a national health care system, or single-payer will result in substandard care and long waiting lines. My friends in Canada think we're chumps.
Well, it passed the KISS test, I guess that settles it. Lets totally forget other methods that pass the KISS test, and we will also forget the myriad of other thing that where done more difficult because of social reason and they didn't have the advantage of hind site.
They still need to move them after they were made.
", the pyramid gets less wide towards the top. "
That's what I've been doing wrong!
Doesn't mean they were formed in place.
Of course, a new valid theory about them seems to co out every decade, with little followup.
The premise is to makes stolen phone useless; which would nearly stop phone theft.
"The thief will unfairly target older phone model owners."
what the? dude, the thief is being unfair when he decided to steal a phone. By nature it's unfair. I highly doubt a phone thief will be an economist trying to equally balance the loss across society.
Setting aside all the incorrect assumptions you've stuffed into there, at worse case it would only be a few years, then phone swill be practically useless to steal.
This is a huge change on the road. Just like all other changes, it needs to be put in incrementally so we can manage unintended consequence.
It's smart planning.
" that would confuse the hell out of the computer."
no it wouldn't. The computer isn't running the computations to calculate if two parallel line eventual cross(they can, btw*). It checks it's mapping software and then tells you their isn't a match.
*IF they are infinitely long in 3 or 4th dimensional space.
You do know some insurance companies are already have ads talking about automated vehicles, right?
Liability has been dealt with., It is not an issue.
A) Fails due to improper maintenance? Owner fault.
B) Drive intentional tries to do something stupid? drivers fault
C) Defect? manufactures fault
D) Any of those things done be another vehicles, well that's for their insurance to deal with.
"I can make up plenty of wacky scenarios which may or may not ever happen, and it probably wouldn't be an exhaustive list of things which could happen "
as I can with current vehicles.
Larger and stronger at a younger age would seem to be a good survival trait, not a bad one.
Too inexperienced to make good decisions + too strong to be easily controlled = excellent chances of dying young.
Like he gave a damn about the show.
last year? 10.8 million reported accidents.
" Put another way, I'm a 99.95% safe driver."
No, you are not. No one is. When you, and I, and everyone else drives, there will be long periods where you aren't paying attention. The fact that no accident occurs is a matter of rote and luck.
Also, 99.95% is COMPLETELY meaningless.
"days driven vs. accidents, though,"
Yes, using a stupid useless metric, you appear safe.
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
