And there you are.

What do you mean? Hamas prints its charter on good paper and still intends to destroy Israel.

Not so much "debunked" as tried to distract and confuse what the facts actually are.

Did you have the roster of who fired them? I doubt it. The only reason that hamas would arrest anyone attacking Israel isn't because they disagree with act itself, but the timing, or the competition.

That would be disproportionate, committing a major war crime as revenge for simple murder. And Gaza isn't being "leveled."

That certainly seems to be your usual line - Jews don't count, killing Jews doesn't count.

A paper towel emblazoned in script: Uberbah. And it isn't so much "over" the house as in the alley, in a large object shaped like a can. It will probably be gone by 6:30 AM tomorrow, or if not, someday, as it heads to the ash heap of history.

Was watching this from the time it was just a theory and renderings and I love the idea, why dish out hundreds for an entire new phone when all you want is more storage? Or a better camera? I would love to upgrade individual parts a la desktop computers, and it has a real shot of becoming a reality with backing by any of the big guys

Surely you must have some evidence for this?

Every person is different, not everyone cares if.they have a few pounds on, other people care are fashon, while.others dont give a flying fuck. Generally people who had a "problem" and fixed it do one of two things, move on with their lives, or become so obsessed with the fact that they beat their "problem" that they spend their entire lives telling everyone.how wrong they are

Gotta love that site, too bad "doing something" is not the same as doing the right thing. Sure, hes done alot, what has he done to make the country better jack shit

You sound like an ex smoker who never shuts up about how bad smoking is... here is a clue, we are happy you didnt something to better yourself, but shut the fuck up, and stop acting like a smug prick just because you bettered yourself and think anyone else who doesnt is a lazy sack of shit

Right? And we can swap white people with black people so the can see what thats like, and men with women and so on, this of the sensitivity training potential!!!

Damn near every country in the world though t so at the time, and there are still good arguments that they were sshipped to syria so yes...that was a good assumption... should we have gone to war over that hell no

drugs are increasingly being tested on homeless, destitute and mentally ill people

This is an outrage and a waste. We must switch to testing on the successful and the smart, who have nothing else to contribute anyway!

Second, it turns out many human trials are being run by doctors who have had their licenses revoked for drug addiction, malpractice and worse

Sure, malpractice, drug addiction and, especially, the unspecified "worse" are known to cause people to quickly forget all the training they've ever received in the medical school, and all the practice they got before losing their license.

i learned ohms law in high school, just what it was and its basics, not application or anything but that should be easy stuff for a 3rd year

there IS a racism problem in tech, but not the racism problem that jackson wants. The racism as you pointed out is directed to americans, white or black or hispanic, only asians seem to be protected in tech.

im not sure, i think al sharpton is a bigger racist

Arbitrarily redefining the terms to suit your argument doesn't make you right, and ins't a valid form.

I am in full agreement with you here. Unfortunately, that — redefining the terms — is exactly, what proponents of "gay marriage" want the rest of us to do. They want the society to change the meaning of the word "marriage" to include homosexual unions (which no civilization in the history of the world has ever equated with regular marriage). You found "paraplegic karate" to be ridiculous — well, "gay marriage" is equally non-sensical...

Gays want to be "married". We all KNOW what they mean by that.

Yeah, they want the recognition — both societal and legal — that has hitherto been given only to the heterosexual couples, to be given to homosexual unions as well. Whether such recognition is a good idea or not, I don't believe it to be a human right — and that is how this subtopic started, when somebody up above equated Iran's handling of their gays with America's treatment of ours.

I was not suggesting that the law prevented gays from entering into straight marriages.

"Straight marriage" is just as much a tautology, as "gay marriage" is a self-contradiction (think "meatless steak")...

I'm beyond it. Our parents aren't. But I think my generation is beyond it. Once they phase out of leadership roles, I think parasites like Jessie will find they have guilt upon which to feed.