Comment Re: Use public DNS (Score 3, Informative) 181
Personally use 4.2.2.[1-6]
I think they are provided by Level 3. Get great response time here in the Canadian Prairies.
I've never trusted my ISP's DNS servers.
Personally use 4.2.2.[1-6]
I think they are provided by Level 3. Get great response time here in the Canadian Prairies.
I've never trusted my ISP's DNS servers.
I've also been searching for a new music player.
Right now trying Exaile. It seems to work alright.
I only listen to music as background noise while I'm programming, however. I had it load the entire
Same boat here basically.
I've been doing web design and development since I was 10. I've been making money doing it since I was 14. I moved out on my own when I was 15.
I turn 25 one week from today. I'm now married with two kids. I live in a small town of approx 35,000 people in Saskatchewan, Canada. We are currently renting a town house for around $700/mo. Basic utilities are around $150/mo.
With my wife working full time with a wage around $13.50/hr it certainly works for us. I stay home with the kids (daycare is expensive!) and work around her schedule when it comes to meeting with clients, etc.
The goal is when both of my kids are in school, I will be able to really focus on the business and take on even more clients. Eventually rent some office space and grow from there.
Build it up little by little and eventually you will be comfortable. Around here you can make around $35,000/year before paying taxes. That certainly makes it easier.
I have lived in Saskatchewan, Canada my entire life. We do not have Daylight Saving Time.
I don't believe any of the 'problems' you pointed out have any validity and you are simply making stuff up.
I'm curious to know if you've ever actually used it?
I'm not out to start a flame war or anything...
I been Gentoo/Funtoo for a long time (7-ish years I think) and gotta say I prefer it over various other systems I've used.
I use Funtoo on my primary workstation, laptop, and a mix of Funtoo/Gentoo on various servers (bare metal and virtualized) and it works great.
I use Gentoo, and find its portage system much more superior to most distro's.
With that said, I typically recommend Mint Linux to people who are interested in getting started with Linux.
For every site they take down, hundreds more will pop up.
This is just a scare tactic. $110 Million? The company only had $5 Million in assets. This is all show. They will never actually get $110 Million. Ever.
No but facebook (and twitter I think) resolve the short link, check for HTTP forwards, and check the forward URL against the block list.
I don't know if they check recursively or not, however.
Who the hell uses the email address provided by their ISP?
Personally, I use paid e-mail hosting services for my family's e-mail needs, at a domain that I own.
Any distro with a repository, its up to the distro package managers.
In some cases this is the developer of the software, but usually not. Dependencies can be tricky.
I bought a cheap 7" Android 4.1 tablet from a company called Mediasonic in July 2012.
I bought it for my kids, and got it on sale for about $80 (+tax & shipping).
My kids are (now) 2 and three years old.
Surprisingly the tablet still works despite constant abuse from my kids. I should havr bought two, but I didnt think my kids would fight over it as much as they do.
As others have mentioned there are a lot of legal and tax reasons they could not accept the "donation".
However for future reference you could always go down the Corporate Sponsorship route. Many projects accept these and are also a write-off on your companies taxes (eg. advertising).
I didn't want to get too indepth but I have covered that issue simply by using autocomplete="off" on thr form, and input elements.
To take it even further I generate the form field 'name' & 'id' tag attributes at random on page generation, and store a 'map' in the session data to un-obfuscate it on the submitted page. My session handling implementation prevents session hijacking, also.
The specific reason I suggest an external CSS file is to rule out simple parsing of the DOM/CSS. Also because I put everything in cacheable, minified CSS files. Just a matter of preference, really. I intentionally avoid Javascript solutions to make it simpler for me, and so I don't rule out the odd user using NoScript or similar. As others have mentioned, it is very commonly used. And typically inneffective on high traffic sites. I run a business doing design/development/hosting where 80% of my clients are local SMB's (although I am currently in the process of expanding into virtual server hosting, but that is another story). The described methods work for me and my clients. There are clearly much more complex routes you could take, but usually at a cost of causing more problems than it is worth. Just my opinion, though.
I've been developing websites over 10 years and have never needed a captcha system.
This is how I always go about it:
1) Include a form input element labelled as something common, like a telephone number but on a registration form that would never actually require a telephone number. Hide the parent div using CSS in an external CSS file. When the form is submit, check to see if the element is filled out. If it is, simply display a message that you think their registration may be automated and to try again. If it continues, please contact us by other means (phone, email, etc) and we will help them through it.
2) Time the registration from the time the page is loaded to the time it is submit, if its less than 10 seconds, do the same as above, simply display a message saying you think their registration is automated and to try again, etc.
When used in conjunction I feel I've cut out 99.9999% of spam or false registrations. The timing method has to be done server side and stored in a session, and is fairly involved so not easy to do properly if you are new to web development. There is also the issue of someone hitting the back button to try again after a failed submission (if you don't use client-side validation), and them submitting from a cached page, but can be worked around if you know what you are doing.
Obviously its not bullet proof, and if the CSS file doesn't load then someone would see the extra form element. But its a small price to pay for effective protection.
Anyone else have other methods they use?
You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken