added to that, their connections are contended (50:1 ratio is usual here), all consumer grade connections are contended. so if a few of your neighbours are on bittorrent, you can't play games.
Because some protocols require low latency. Other protocols (such as bittorrent) don't require low latency, but will swallow all the available bandwidth, given the chance & prevent low latency protocols from working as intended, if the low latency traffic isn't prioritised.
Demon is a UK ISP & there's no chance of this net neutrality nonsense happening here, so it's not an issue for them.
break it up so that one company (or the state) owns the lines, they then allow open access to anybody else that wants to lease space on the lines to provide a service.
A more competitive isp market would solve the net neutrality problem. then if any isp did do some kind of 'protection scheme' that slowed or blocked a service that you use, you'd be free to switch to another isp that doesn't.
Network neutrality regulations can only cause problems. Sometimes isps need to throttle or block certain types of traffic, to ensure that more important traffic is faster. they need to be free to block ddos attacks, they often need to throttle bittorrent, to ensure that latency sensitive applications still work at busy times, on cheap consumer level connections. It can only increase the price and/or lower the quality of service.
It's actually designed to keep the Lib Dems in power for the full term, whatever happens. The Lib Dems could still form a coalition with Labour & all the smaller parties (assuming they'd agree), if they decide to split the current coalition, without having another general election.
surely the clue is in the name. copyright laws refer to the right to copy a creative work. if no copying occurred...
The problem is the digging up roads bit, that's quite costly if you want to create your own infrastructure to supply residential internet. It's so costly that it's a natural monopoly, the market is actually much more efficient if it's supplied by a monopoly provider, rather than having 10 different companies digging up everybody's roads. Rural connections are unprofitable too.
So, I'd suggest a nationalised monopoly on the conduit that carries underground cables. Open access to any private company that wants to run fibre or other cables through that conduit to provide services to consumers, auction the space inside the conduit.
Also, Network Neutrality is absolute nonsense, it'd break the internet & I'm speaking as a small web content creator.
Arbitrage trading is a possible application for very accurate timing in financial markets. That is the mechanism that eliminates arbitrage & it creates more liquidity in the markets, as well as more stable & accurate prices.
By imposing a minimum time limit to hold onto stock, you'd prevent a lot of arbitrage trading, which would create more arbitrage. It'd greatly reduce the liquidity in the markets too, making it harder for everybody to buy & sell.
that's why we have the gpl.
"Money is the root of all money." -- the moving finger