Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Its in you or it's not (Score 1) 840

From the age of 5, I had already built a home telegraph. I had bell wire (house wire for doorbells), I got doorbell push buttons, lights, and made a partyline circuit. I learned morse code, at a very few words per minute.

By age 8 or 9, I was fixing tube radios. Usually it was a dead tube, or a bad electrolytic capacitor.
By 11, I was building kits from Heath and Eico. My preferred were from the latter.
By 15, I was fixing all appliances, changing tap washers, and finding out about watch and clock mechanisms.
By 17, I was Mr watch repair for Sears, I was charging bargain prices. And I did all the other stuff too. I was into hi-fi, Vinyl longplay records and the finest of turntables (rec-o-cut, Garrad), I had my vtvm, my sweep generator, and Heath Oscilloscope.
By 19, I was a carburator expert. I had all the tools for changing spark plugs, rotating tires, and knew the V8 engine design by heart.
We were learning sponges in those days.

Today, kids are whiz kids an smartphone apps. They know not about epicycloidal gearing, "angles and draw" for watch anchors and escape wheels, "watch beating" incabloc, jeweling, carburators, plug-changing, welding, and so much more.

I left that for a masters degree in math, but I have never stopped playing and loving it. My thoughts were always impressed with the watch mechanism engineers who could work with near microscopic sized parts and movements.

Ahh them were the fun days. It was an enjoyment to do all that I did as a hobby. Today, I maintain my home and garden, and look at my grandkids. I am disappointed at how little they know.

Comment Re:C versus Assembly Language (Score 1) 226

And he missed the second step:

File a bug report for the compiler with 'missed optimization opportunity' in the title and a reduced test case.

We like to see real-world examples of where we're generating bad code - if we don't see them, we can't fix them.

How do you define bad code? I define it as producing erroneous results. But if your in a compute bound application, and the cost to upgrade hardware looks formidable, then you look at optimization. In my world, I look at optimization first, and hardware upgrades as second choice.

There are sure hours and hours of test cases for the work was done for optimization. The author looked at employing math factoring, not in designing new hardware. Great!!!

Well done!

I promise to not store and count with my integer fields in display format.

Comment Re:not just many eyes (Score 1) 255

The security of the open source model isn't really the problem or the answer here. The problem is homogeneity. A million different sites and applications rely on just a few libraries, so that when a bug hits one, it has massive impact on the entire internet.

We also know that the answer isn't in rolling your own security. Very few people or organizations are likely to be able to securely implement their own version of TLS. Even the best packages of today didn't start out perfect, they had to iterate through several flaws to get to where they are today.

So perhaps the better answer is in having more packages to choose from? Instead of picking just openssl by default, it would be better to have a broad array of choices. With a dozen packages on the market, that might mean 11 times out of 12 the bad guys wouldn't exploit our site. If the packages are interchangeable, we'd be better positioned to switch them quickly in case of emergency.

Today, disk space is very cheap. Memory is very cheap, and I think nothing of having 32gigs of ram. My point-- do away with dynamic linking for your application. Do static linking, except possibly for display libraries. If a flaw is found, its going to require many recompiles, but that is offset by the non-reliance of multiple dynamically linked libraries. As was mentioned, get a flaw or security issue with that library, or create a "man in the middle" attack with one dynamically linked library, and voila, your security is compromised. With static linking, your application is more secure and is known to work with more versions of the operating systems

Comment Re:Ouch (Score 1) 161

This all makes sense and is probably a good idea.

That said, despite school having literally been decades ago, I find myself empathizing with the kids on this one, who I'm sure arn't seeing this as an investment in their future but rather yet more time spent in the dungeon. I didn't exactly hate school growing up, but damn if I wasn't ready to get the hell outa there when the bell rang.

Maybe it's because we just had Christmas and that always puts me in a nostalgic child like mood. I'm sure if they announced this in September when school is just getting back into session and screwing up my morning commute I'd say to hell with the kids, but for now, the kid in me say: BOOOO!

Its not a bad idea. Our kids start at 8:15 to Noon, and 12:45 to 3:30. They are in public school, and half the day is taught in French, and the other half in English. The kids learn maths, science, and all the social studies that go along with multiculturalism. What does suffer somewhat is spelling, because of the doubling up and not dubling up. example department and département. We pay for extra curricular activities (1 hr twice a week). Its alloted for extra sports, a third language, or religious studies. (The extra hour is not in the school cirreculum, but the school board makes the classroom available. )

Comment Re:Sorry media (Score 1) 166

Yeah, and global warming is faked by the left wing media, and vaccines are poison, and municipal water flouridation is a communist plot. Oh, and by the way, you don't really believe that you are anonymous here on /., do you?

Doubting the official line on the Sony hack is hardly the stuff of tinfoil-hat denialism. How's this for a scenario: (1) Garden-variety haxx0rz and/or a disgruntled employee steal a bunch of embarrassing files from Sony -- plenty of motive there -- and dump the files on the web. (2) Some moron in the media starts speculating that it has something to do with an idiotic movie about North Korea, and the echo chamber amplifies it as truth. (3) Haxx0rz, sensing an epic opportunity for lulz, play along with the feeding frenzy in the media with some crazy threats against screening the movie, then sit back and watch the fun as paranoia in the FBI and mindless nationalism in the population do the rest of their work for them.

Couldn't be.

What if you substituted the presidents name for that of NK? Would that go well with Americans? I bet it will go very very well with Arab countries and in those countries where American Companies (United Fruit, et. al) exploited those countries for their wealth. I bet the foreign country gets only 2% of the benefit and the Corp and bribes get the rest.

Comment Re:Dem haxxorz dey be haxxin. (Score 1) 166

In a country where the internet is about as commonplace as for us having your own rocket launch system in the backyard? Please. How do you hit NKor via internet? Take down their online payment system? Hack their official pages so their citizens would get to see defaced pics of li'l Kim?

How?

I can see that as an offensive force, but defense? Please.

From what I read, and what I am led to believe, probably every water treatment plant, every electrical generating system, including the interconnects, has been identified and an attack prepared. The USA electrical grid needs only a core state to fail, and the entire country would fail.

And if you include airports in their attack catalogues then the North Korean protections are complete. Attack them and most probably, the USA part of the internet, and possibly the entire world would be downed.

So, its ok to joke about the NKs capabilities, , Its ok to believe that the commercial anti-viruses give you a false sense of protection, but... there is no protection. Stuxnet was a perfect example. Perhaps the NKs virus software is already installed and laying dormant, just in case....

Comment Re:Patents... ugh (Score 1) 63

Software patents are utter bullshit from word one. They should just go away and stay away.

Hardware patents are something else, but it's pretty clear they are being *very* poorly managed. I don't even like saying it, but I'm afraid I agree with you: they do more harm than good now.

We need an entirely new model of encouraging invention. Trade secret is useful in providing a reasonable profit window and establishment of precedence in the marketplace (the only way to go with software, as far as I'm concerned) as the window you get correlates well with the complexity of what you've done, but has its limits when we're talking hardware.

Perhaps a way for society to pay for an invention, and once that's been done, it goes right into the "available to everyone" pool. Panels of experts setting perceived value and an immediate payment being made, followed by a revisit ten years later to determine how it all went, with extra reward possible if the invention's impact was underestimated?

Look at me, suggesting government committees. Oy. I should go bang my head on a table.

But damn, we *really* need to clean out the drains. Patents are the disgusting glop that are making the system run slower and slower, while getting legal sewage all over everyone involved. The only consistent winners here are the plumbers (lawyers.)

I don't consider algorithms to be patentable. But I consider a process to be patentable. What is the difference? An algorthim is an application of a set of defined rules that presents a proof, a set of steps to follow to a solution. An algorithm may be copyrighted. A process is a application of a set of rules to define the control or manufacture of a product. (Driver for hardware, agricultural process, or manufacturing process, fabrication process). If we deem an algorithm a process, then the writing of a book has to be patented.

Can the algorithm be the product? I am not a lawyer, and I leave that to others to interpret that interpretation.

Software patents are utter bullshit from word one.

Comment Re:Many DDR3 modules? (Score 1) 138

FTFP. "We induce errors in most DRAM modules (110 out of 129) from three major DRAM manufacturers."

Short version, leakage current from adjacent gates can nudge other to bit-flip. I don't think this is a manufacturing problem as it is a fundamental EE design oversight. So yeah, defective by design (unintentionally)!!

So, as ddr3 gets more dense, and space between the cells has decreased, we should be standardizing on ECC memory for all desktops and servers. The second thought I have is "What minimal cpu clockspeed would enable this activity to occur with standard hardware? " It this problem likely to occur with off the self hardware motherboards and cpus?

Comment Re:I think it's about time... (Score 1) 97

I think it's about time we implemented some sort of single use credit card system.

That's how Chip and PIN works. Your account number is still fixed, but your authorization to spend from it (your PIN) is encrypted by the chip, and is valid only for a single transaction. There are still kinks with non-electronic transactions, but those can be solved.

Look for it to be all over the US by October of next year.

For the past two years, my Visa provider intercepts the authorizations that are made via the internet, and electronically asks me to respond to questions that only I know the answer (mothers name, graduation year, etc). If I fail, the transaction authorization fails. So, just because someone knows the 3 digit code on the back of the card means zero.
And our credit cards have had the chip version since 2011. That technology is just coming into force in the USA, after 4 years of fraud.

Comment Re:of course it wasn't NK (Score 1) 236

Thank you. I don't know why so much of Slashdot seems to be taking the obvious "it was NK omg" story at face value, even after NK explicitly denied it. They take credit for things they've never done - if they'd hacked Sony successfully, of course they'd be bragging about it.

Perhaps they could solve the ISIS problem

Comment Time for a guaranteed income. (Score 1) 628

As robots take over, and liberate man from tasks, it also implies that man is liberated from an income. Should there be a have and have not society? Can the have society sustain the infrastructures we hold dear, such as roads, schools, desire to be productive?

If robots take over, we will require a guaranteed wage. That will allow money to circulate, and society to be vibrant and alive.

If that does not occur, look for malaise and crime to grow out of proportion to today's level.

Comment Re:Big Mistake (Score 1) 33

Perhaps. That is certainly a valid concern. However, the state of the art in this area is continually advancing very quickly. Just having an advanced fab in China does not mean that Chinese engineers are able to create the next generation chips and fabs. I think Intel's move is quite logical, and the danger of intellectual property theft not too serious in their case.

Intel, like GM will gradually leave the USA for permenancy in China. Population 1.2 billion vs 350 million, Single party government vs democracy, better labour cost controls, lower overheads and government (universal) medicare.

Comment Re:Than don't sign the contract (Score 1) 189

In other news: A company so desperate to get into bed with Apple signs away their soul for rainbows and promises.

New entrepreneurs are always optimistic. They haven't dealt with irresponsible organizations or organizations that think out loud but then choose decisions other than what they let people believe. In a way one could say Apple was bullshitting their plans to confuse the competitors.

Comment Re:Idea (Score 1) 244

Actually the opposite is the case. Our economy has exactly the opposite, but nonetheless equally destructive, problem communism had: They had a shortage of supply. We have a shortage of demand.

Our economy produces enough. Proof? Go anywhere and behold how desperately everyone wants to sell. Be it goods or services, You'll be hard pressed to NOT find someone offering whatever you may want to you. What's lacking is the demand. And without it, there is no market either.

If you think people need any kind of incentive to be ravenous asshole capitalists, think again. Those that could invest already want to. Quite badly, too. There just isn't anything to invest in, because there is no viable business possible without consumers that would want to buy what you'd offer. And the main reason for this is simply that there are not enough people who have enough money to become consumers. And jobs are sadly not created when someone wills a business into existence. Well, you can do that, but it's not really viable to produce without a chance to sell what you produce. You'll be bankrupt in no time.

A job is created when the market situation of demand forces the supply side into hiring additional personnel to fill that demand. Nobody in their sane mind creates a job for the sake of creating a job, paying another person and putting more goods he can't sell on the stockpile. If this is the situation (and that is the situation currently), the sane option is NOT to hire someone and NOT to produce more of what you can't already sell.

I fully concur with your statements. As corporations outsource jobs, the local net net discretionary income disappears. Only essentials are purchased. It's sad, as the American society has become a for profit everything, from public education to medicine. Even the military is a for profit institution. MacDonalds has become the location of "lets go out for an evening's supper"

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...