Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Supersonic [Speeds] (Score 1) 30

The post mentioned "The jets [...] shoot off at supersonic speeds..." While determining supersonic speed requires not being in a vacuum, once you know what speed supersonic-speed is, can it not be used as a measuring stick for comparison? If I'm moving at a snails pace, I'm likely not crawling across the ground, in fact, I could be doing any number of non-transportive activities that could be claimed to be at a snails pace.

Comment Re:Suicide (Score 1) 838

Great example of the slippery slope logical fallacy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope). Going from me having that option to you, my family, or the government having the option to end my life requires much more than just an assumption that could occur.

Comment Re:It goes both ways (Score 3) 201

"Most skeptics reject everything outright" This may very well be true of most skeptics you know, but my definition of skeptics is different. My definition, and the skeptics I know, more closely align with the definition of skepticism associated with philosophy (second definition here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism#Definition) or the one just following for scientific skepticism (here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism#Scientific_skepticism). They tend not to reject everything outright, but to suspend judgement until sufficient evidence is in place to make a judgement.

Comment Use Family History & Genetic Testing (Score 1) 341

Two very powerful predictors of future health risks are family history and some forms of genetic testing. However, thanks to a fairly recent regulation change, GINA (Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008), which is designed to prevent insurers from using this type of data improperly (i.e., limiting/dropping coverage or adjusting premiums), insurers are now very hesitant to collect any of that type of information. Sounds good, right? Well, consider that many companies and individuals utilize Wellness programs which are typically provided by those same insurance companies. The Wellness programs attempt to identify and stratify members based on available information in order to provide coaching and guidance on how to best mitigate current and future risks. Available information many times no longer includes these two fairly powerful predictors. Wellness programs do help to reduce both the employer's and the insurance companies long term costs, but the also benefit the individual members. I, personally, want to know as much as possible about my potential future risks and what, if anything, I can do about it.

Comment Re:People should be less arrogant and more interes (Score 1) 215

Hey, if something works for you, great -- even if it doesn't have the proper evidence to support it. Everyone needs a good placebo in their back pocket. Hell, there's even a remote/outside/small/minuscule chance that something about you is different than the rest of us and said treatment does actually work on you in some unknown way. Great. But really, I don't care how far out and strange a treatment may sound, it can be tested, but that takes time and money. People truly interested in helping their fellow humans out will spend the time and money to do the proper testing and those just trying to make a buck off the gullibility of our fallible human minds won't. Where do you want to put your trust?

Slashdot Top Deals

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...