Sounds like it was hard to published it on its merits alone. The last line of the paper is a bit cryptic.
"The project was funded privately by Lottolab Studio, as the referees argued that young people cannot do real science."
What does the funding source have to do with the referees' prejudices? Was some extra funding needed to resolve their concerns?
Personally, I am going to look for an excuse to cite their paper.
When we were kids we couldn't afford science kits. We just had to play with gun powder, gasoline, matches and plastic models. And we liked it.
... a big magnifying glass and the ants were free.
There is another station 3 to 4 miles away on RIT campus and another one at the GM facility.
http://www.rit.edu/research/sustainability_story.php?id=26
About a year ago the dispenser listed the price as being $1 per GGE. I assume that was a subsidized price. Unfortunately it did not take regular credit cards only cards issued specifically for the station.
The press conference said she had ear pain.
The primary interface for most people is X. There needs to a way to switch between multiple X sessions as seamlessly as switching between console sessions.
"Here's something to think about: How come you never see a headline like `Psychic Wins Lottery.'" -- Comedian Jay Leno
