Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Aussie freedoms are inferior (Score 1) 337

Wow, you fearmonger much?

You have declared "constitution free zones".

No we don't. There is nowhere in the United States that is a "constitution free zone". That's just media blowing something up out of proportion. There are cases where the border patrol oversteps it's bounds, but that doesn't mean you don't have the rights afforded you by the constitution. Worst case is it escalates up to a court, the court sets it right (through due process). It's not perfect, but it's easy to point and say that's not perfect when you aren't charged with coming up with the "perfect" solution.

You detain and torture people in prisons with little to no judicial oversight or recourse.

And? These aren't American citizens, on a military base, and (mostly) classified as enemy combatants in a war. What OTHER country sends war criminals through their normal judicial system? None. Oh, and you are talking about 780 people.

Your own president has executed a citizen under the guise of terrorism overseas by air-strike without any due process.

Enemy combatants in war. Sucks to be them.

Your idea of due process when you think you get it happens behind closed doors in secret courts.

Just because it is behind closed doors and not open to public scrutiny by itself does not make it less of a due process. Not all trials and decisions necessarily need to be a media spectacle. It does make it harder to prove (or disprove) improper behavior, but that doesn't make it so. I'm not claiming the system is perfect, but just better than the alternatives.

And even when someone in power occasionally has an idea that is positive to your freedoms it gets struck down in congress, in the white house, or better yet just simply gets done anyway without oversight by a three letter agency.

That's your opinion. Feel free to voice your opinion and vote for change.

Comment Statistics (Score 1) 363

In the U.S., a quarter of all accidents involving pedestrians happen while a vehicle is making a left turn.

Let me guess, a quarter of all accidents involving pedestrians happen while a vehicle is making a right turn, a quarter of all accidents while a vehicle is going straight, and a quarter of all accidents while a vehicle is in reverse?

Comment Re:Still don't trust SSDs (Score 1) 144

And I have 6 SSDs currently, none of which have failed. On the other hand, I also have 13 rust buckets (working), and I'm approaching a graveyard of about 11, all of which are less than 3 years old. Some of which just instantly died.. No SMART, no warning, just dead. Some died during a power cycle and didn't come back. Average time to death for the rust buckets is about 1 year. Some drives have been replaced twice already (The replacement was replaced). The SSDs are about 4 years old on average. I'd have seagate repair them, but the cost of shipping them to seagate and back, and then getting a drive I know will die again shortly just isn't worth the cost. Just replacing them with another model as they die.

All drives are kept cool, on a top tier power supply which is connected to a UPS. So it's neither a power problem, nor a cooling problem. And the replacement rust buckets aren't dying. So your theory of how awesome and bulletbroof rust buckets are, is just a anecdote is they are susceptible to crappy failure rates and instant death syndrome that you describe.

I'll take the SSD write "problem" any day. Rust buckets just like anything else are a crap shoot. I bought the wrong model from the wrong manufacturer. Oddly, the rust buckets are mainly write-once, read seldom, while the SSDs get pounded consistently yet it's the rust buckets that are dying.

Slashdot Top Deals

Work is the crab grass in the lawn of life. -- Schulz

Working...