I can't recall a time in which it refered to anything else. Here's another example from 1985: the original Atari at service manual. http://www.atarimania.com/docu...

So it has been in use for at least 30 years. Not exactly "new". If you can find another reference before that in which it talks about resolution being described in pixel density (which would be hard I imagine as screens didn't have pixels back then). You might be able to find a reference to a tv (which isn't the same field) describing resolution in terms of lines, but again, lines isn't density either.

QEMM's optimize was awesome back in the day. It'd get me 95% of the way there.

Your blind test isn't actually testing to see if people can tell the difference between 1080p and 4k. It's testing to see if people can correctly identify which is which. That's not the same thing.

A better blind-study is to have two TVs placed side by side of the same make and model. Turn off all upsampling and then show a 1080p image on one and a 4K image on the other alternating randomly the which is which and have the participant identify which image looks better. You will have a much different result, and have proven that people can tell the difference quite easily.

Let's try an example. Enter "resolution" into google. What does it say?

Google says you are wrong.

Let's see what Microsoft says. Right click your desktop, and choose "Screen Resolution". What does it say? Microsoft says:

Boy those silly software guys must have got it all wrong. Let's check the hardware guys... How about dell?
http://accessories.us.dell.com...

Under tech spec, that monitor says:

Guess the hardware guys are wrong too. So who uses it the one true "Jane Q. Public" way?

Yes it does. It's the number of pixels available on the screen, usually described in WxH.

Resolution has always referred to the number of pixels available on the screen.

Dictionary.com:

In windows, when you go the screen resolution dialog, you tell it how many pixels by how many pixels your display is. It's been that way since Windows 2.0 back in 1987.

Sort of like windows-L?

Too bad he wasn't running windows. Linux is so insecure.

Perhaps it was perceived, but they determined that the market of people willing to face fines and possible imprisonment so that they can save $10 in their insurance wasn't big enough to warrant the expense of building all that extra security in.

Actually, a great location would be fermi-lab in Batavia, IL. Plenty of space there considering they built it for the large collider, in fact, he could probably build it right above the collider ring and there should be very little no/resistance and no environmental impact. Not to mention the near access to some of the countries best minds right on campus.

That's easy to solve. Since the keyboard and mouse are very likely near a PC, just run a charging cable to one of it's USB ports and never disconnect it. Then you can get rid of the battery completely. Problem solved. Then you've got a nice battery-less, always charged wireless keyboard and mouse. Tada!

WTF is Git? Is that a new fork of git? Cause I can't tell what you are talking about because you put the wrong case.

Yes, a modern cruise ship does indeed "kill it". In length, volume, speed, height, and weight. You could probably fit 8-10 titanics in the AVERAGE modern cruise ship.

Emergency Rooms don't need to treat minor ailments. They only need to treat someone if they have something threatening, and they can not be safely transferred to another hospital.

And a legal license to use them only for development or testing, and not to be used as your main computer OS. Guess you forgot that part.

Why would you care about the log files being fragmented? Do you even know what file fragmentation is, and why that image and complaints are pretty silly?