The irony is that Chu is attacking nerds for stereotyping all women. But in the process, he's stereotyping all nerds.
Look Arthur, we're all really happy that you've got a GF who you think this stunt will impress. But throwing one group under the bus to stand up for another still results in just as many people getting hit by the bus.
This has always puzzled me. Why, in this so-called enlightened age of ours, is it so hard for us to realize that there's room under the bus for everybody?
what you're actually saying is, 'Oh my god, I’m capable of doing a terrible thing, but I would never actually do it.
you lost me
I had surgery to gain control over a "wandering" eye when it became obvious how much my inability to maintain eye contact was costing me
Why didn't you just send an anonymous message to HR requesting they enforce the cleavage policy?
The thief was killed because he raised a gun to an officer, not because he was tracked down by GPS.
Can we mod a submission as "-1 TROLL"?
I look forward to next week's headline "Robbery Suspect Noticed Wearing Hawaiian Shirt and Killed"
marriage does not equal love, doesn't guarentee love, and carries many obligations and raises many issues having nothing to do with love
you sound like that guy at the end of those life-affirming pharmaceutical commercials who reads all the horrible side effects super quick
Fourth unhappy one? you're not making mistakes, you have a problem
Might as well face it, I'm addicted to love
Have you ever made a massive, expensive mistake?
Glances woefully down at wedding ring...
The person learned their lesson and will be extremely cautious in the future.
Thinks back on previous three weddings...
if they're ready for a Zombie apocalypse, it stands to reason that they're ready for more realistic variations on the theme.
Sure we may be ready for a zombie apocalypse, but are we prepared for the poor plotting, derivative story-line, cheap jump-scares, wooden acting, gratuitous sex scenes, and corny self-referential jokes of the inevitable sequel?
This is a decision that will affect any search engine, any index, anyone who offers links to publicly available material or provides any sort of aggregation service.
I don't get how this will work. Will these rulings affect google's results in the US? Surely google.com can legally index an article in an EU newspaper. So can the EU then subsequently force google to remove this data from their server in the US? If so, it seems as if the EU is limiting information flow between a US company and US citizens (under the threat that the US company will be punished in the EU if it does not comply). This seems rather peculiar. Yet if this isn't how it works, then anyone in the EU could just visit google.com instead of their local google, thus rendering the whole system moot.
The EU does cherish freedom of speech. But it also cherishes the privacy of the individual.
The US - based on comments on this site - appears to have decided that freedom of speech trumps everything else. You can lie, cheat, shout fire in a crowded theatre, call in fake bomb scares, basically anything at all because it's all "freedom of speech."
The EU takes a much more nuanced view.
This is a canard. Nobody in his right mind, even on this site, contends that free speech ought to allow one to break laws. Punching someone in the face is undoubtedly a form of speech, insofar as it communicates a message, but one cannot defend such an assault on free speech grounds. Likewise with insider trading and any other crime involving speech.
You appear to be framing the difference between the two approaches as one of Yosemite Sam on the one side, speechifying willy nilly without regard for the baleful consequences of his indiscretions, and on the other, the pasty-faced egghead Parisian intellectual in his black beret and turtleneck, heaving a weary sigh at the rusticated antics of his Yankee cousin, whilst making a few minor tweaks to the law in the interests of the basic human decency that so delights the heart of the European, but so quickly withers away in the harsh frontier conditions of the New World. You might bring some of that famed European nuance to bear on the question and consider whether this cartoonish interpretation does anything more than flatter your own ego.
Learn to code and try to get a job coding the software that runs the machines that took your job.
this is fiendishly clever. if you're bad enough at it, you might end up getting your original job back.
Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.