If it was really important to solve the problem, TPTB would adequately fun the institutions it has issues with, rather than just calling them before a hearing and pillorying them in the public eye.

If Congress really wanted to increase computational ability, they would apportion more money to NOAA earmarked for that purpose.

It's easier to get mad and shake your fist than write a check.

I was looking for that and can't believe I missed it. Thanks for pointing it out to me.

EPIC RAP BATTLES OF HISTORY!!!!!!

His analysis doesn't seem to take into account Martin originally wrote books 4 and 5 as one book, Seems to me those numbers should be averaged. Then again, IANAS.

Actually, yes.

My mother turned sixty. A couple of years ago, after being called upon to fix a virus issue on XP for the nth time, I installed Ubuntu on her system. I used XPGnome scripts to make it look like windows XP, installed chrome and put an IE icon on the desktop linking to it, installed OpenOffice, set the default to save to .doc/.xls/.ppt, and put Word/Excel/PowerPoint icons on the desktop, and wrote a script to run in the background about once a month sudo apt-get update && upgrade. I have the root password for it, and can remote ssh to deal with technical issues, and she's none the wiser.

You may want to refrain from having a 73" TV delivered to your car then.

Would it be much better being dropped off in front of your house, waiting for you to get home? Because that always works out well.

I wonder if the existence of miles of fiber just waiting in San Antonio is part of the reason they're considering it.

This. When the ground temps hover around 40F, the snow melts quite easily. Then the air temps get in the 20's and water refreezes on the road. The ice is much more dangerous than the snow. That's why we close schools, businesses, etc.

And it's not the dusting that we get annually. We can handle that. It's when we get 2-3 inches of precipitation that forms ice on our roads that makes it dangerous. We don't drive with bags of kitty litter in our trunks, or just whip out our chains when it gets dangerous. So we shut down. If its orchestrated well, it's a fun holiday we can all laugh about afterwards (See "The Snow" from San Antonio, 1985. If it's not orchestrated well, well...

We can all complain how people in other regions can't handle unconventional weather - Hurricanes in New York (don't build where it floods), 100F+ temps in the Midwest (install air conditioners), Snow in the deep south (buy more snowplows, chains, salt, sand, etc.) Yes, there are solutions that make the situations tenable. No, the capital investment for an event that happens every xx years isn't worth the financial losses from shutting down the city for the time it takes to deal with the situation.

Didn't Tom Scott already talk about this one?

I didn't say it was easy. Good privacy is hard. Creating your own robust software is hard. So the options are to become a neo-luddite, or some open-source fascist. Or accept what is out there, for all the benefits and penalties that are out there. It _is_ a matter of trust.

What I did say was if one doesn't like their options, they need to do something about it. Contribute to an open source project. Call out the worst offenders publicly. Support those that do it right.

I'm sorry you saw this as a personal attack on you and your browser.

You either trust Google with your data, and use their services, or you don't. Same with Facebook, et. al. If you're using this browser, you're trusting this company that they're doing what they say. Maybe you'll peruse the OS code, maybe not. But it's still who and how much you trust. Ultimately, if you want better privacy than what's out there, you need to roll your own browser. Find an open-source project you like, put the features you want in it, take the features you don't want out of it, and go on your merry way.

I like the Stanford approach better. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2007/03/fairy-use-tale

I have a feeling this will be Streisanded into a real word pretty soon.

As I remind my students, "Beta" to Google means they haven't figured out how to profit on it. If they can find a way to profit on it, it then becomes one of their many appliances. If they can't, it gets killed. Clearly, Google didn't have a way to profit on Reader, as they couldn't on Wave, as they couldn't on Health. If they can find a way to profit from Keep, it'll keep. Otherwise it'll be gone like the rest.

As a teacher, I often find the need to discuss details with other teachers about a student that I don't want to document in an e-mail (that can be subpoenaed.) In addition, I have students of low-socioeconomic status who don't have a computer at home, can't use work e-mail for personal matters, and rely on the POTS to communicate with the world. I use my desk phone everyday.