Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Yeah.. (Score 1) 418

Yeah... yeah.

Well FUCK THAT, I will still be playing games as much when I am 60 as now that I am 30.

I am sure you will, but not like you do now! I consider myself a gamer but now at 48, I play games in a different way. I no longer wish to spend hours and days and weeks on the same game. This change happened about 2 years ago.

Now, I need a quick football match, a spin round the block, blow the head off some dude, just as much as I ever did... but now only for short periods of time and not every day.

If you can't find something fun, look harder or GTFO.

It is called growing up and not growing old. I can still out play the kids at football (real with a real ball) and out run them over a distance.

As you get older you learn there is more to life than any single thing and you have to regulate your activities accordingly

Now get off my lawn.

You, my friend, are welcome to visit my lawn any time you like. One of the things I don't do are lawns!

Comment Re:Come to Verizon! (Score 1) 738

GM - Bust!
Coca Cola - prefer Pepsi
McDonalds - We got em in town. Not a Yank in sight! Most seem to come from Central Europe. Probably true of many staff in American franchises too.
Microsoft - You got me on this one. You can proudly to have sole bragging rights!
Anheuser Busch - From the famed Bavarian state in the US?
Fox News - Owned by that well know American philanthropist from... Adelaide. Having forced him to become a US citizen, could you do the rest of us a favour by keeping him there? Just when we thought we had got rid of him, he pops up just to irritate us. Thanks for your help.

I remember when I was small, I used to hear of these "commies". AFAIK, Margaret Thatcher sorted them all out in the 1980s, with a bit of help from some actor chap-or-other - I am a little vague on the details - something to do with minors and dents or dentists or somesuch.

Nowadays they are all fine upstanding people who, having seen the error of their ways, reformed themselves and bought most of our stuff. Apparently they got a good deal because all the things were second hand and a bit old-fashioned and worn out. Anyway we don't call them "commies" any more. We call them "sir".

Comment Re:Hypocrisy (Score 1) 571

You claim the extradition treaty between the US & UK is unbalanced. If true, the UK should press for it to be renogotiated. In the meantime, they need to honor it.

You assume that the relationship bound by the treaty is an equal one. I'd argue that it is not. We have to prove probable cause. You do not.

Again, something for the court to decide as far as how much (if any) punishment to apply.

I never mentioned his mental health, you did. However the Commons Home Affairs Committee - a senior committee of UK politicians from all parties - said that the extradition should be halted because of his "precarious state of mental health. They also said that there was a "serious lack of equality" in the way the extradition treaty deals with UK citizens compared with US citizens. - Source BBC

I am not saying that what he did was right. However, I am saying that the processes being used against him are fundamentally wrong and the potential sentence is severely out of proportion with the offence he committed.

In addition Aspergers sufferers are commonly obsessives combined with a high degree of social naivety, which means they are unable to assess the consequences of their actions. In short there was no criminal intent and I don't think anyone is arguing differently. In this case the weight of law being used is out of proportion to the offence and the punishment threatened is extreme and unreasonable and therefore cruel.

Comment Re:Hypocrisy (Score 1) 571

Because he admits to hacking into computer systems in the USA. So why shouldn't he be extradited?

...because has he been in the US hacking UK computers, he would not be extradited to the UK to stand trial.

The extradition treated between the UK and the US is very one-sided and ill-conceived. It has caused a fair degree of anger, in some circles this side of the pond.

This case has brought the issue to the fore and has made a wide range of people, who normally wouldn't care, feel very uncomfortable. The issue of reciprocity needs to be addressed but unfortunately for McKinnon it will be too late! When he gets to court in the US there will be massive coverage on our news channels and the levels of anger will be heightened. The UK government knows this but they also know they won't be in power when this phase is reached.

During the news coverage McKinnon has come across as a bewildered and lost individual. Your average Brit will not like seeing such as person being hounded in a foreign environment, on the 6pm news. This is an issue that the US government should never pushed forward with, but asked local legislative processes to deal with it!

Comment Re:Well I am leaving. (Score 1) 280

Modern companies do not care about people rights, ethics or even human lives. All that matters to them is only... profit.

It is more than profit matters. Profit is an obligation and everything else is secondary. That is why you have legislation and monitoring bodies to limit the excesses caused by the prime obligation.

Comment Re:Who wants to update?? (Score 1) 1012

This isn't a case of "not supporting" a specific chip. By default it worked just fine, and is working just fine for many people currently using OS X on the Atom. No, this is a case of deliberately disabling a working feature for the express purpose of forcing you to buy their hardware over another's.

I think you'll find that "..forcing you to buy their hardware.." should read:
"..forcing you to install Ubuntu on your existing hardware and never experiencing the delights of owing Apple products.."

Comment Re:Too Confused To Make Heads Or Tails? (Score 1) 166

Nope! The solution is to wait. Readers will appear quite rapidly because they are not the difficult to make. Stores will get their act together quite quickly because they have already taken a hammering from Amazon.

Besides the Kindle is not the finished article. It also has a too stupid a name to be taken seriously. It's not exactly a Hoover nor an iPod.

"Right dear. Just off for a bit of a Kindle." or "The Kindle generation." - I don't think.
That said the Nook is far worse. If you told someone in the UK that you had a Nookie Reader, you'd get some very funny looks!

Comment More PRS idiocy (Score 2, Informative) 645

I recall two other stories relating to the PRS.

One chap was phoned by the PRS and was found to be listening to music at work. He informed them he composed the piece and was the sole artist. This cut no ice, with the PRS. (I suppose he might possibly listen to illegal music, so he should be presumed guilty!)

Another incident (2008) relates to the sole owner and lone worker in a garage in Nottingham being told he had to pay £150 to listen to the radio. see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nottinghamshire/7671215.stm

Even if I listen to my MP3 player through headphones, my company is liable to pay for a licence! Perhaps I'd have to join the smokers outside for my quick fix of some illicit Pink Floyd.

Comment Re:Oh, get over yourself (Score 1) 556

The National Association for the Education of Young Children state that:

"Computers should supplement--and not replace--activities and materials such as art, sand, water, books, music, outdoor exploration, experimenting with writing materials, dramatic play, and socializing with other children."

The Alliance for Childhood produced a report in 2000 which recommends that computer usage by you children is beneficial, providing it is in moderation and supported by good software.

Professor Douglas Clements in Scholastic Early Childhood Today said that even at the age of 2 a child can be sat on someones knee in front of a computer.
He says "In my professional opinion, if the child enjoys the experience and seems to be interacting and engaged, then the same benefits are present as when reading a book or playing blocks together."

If you search for references, you will find that there are plenty of examples where computer usage amongst the young is encouraged and shown to be beneficial. However, the thrust is that as with any activity, especially with the very young it should be supported and time limited.

This really applies to any activity. As a parent it is easy to leave children in front of screens to amuse themselves. I would argue that it is not a good thing for kids to spend long periods watching endless cartoons on the TV. The same applies to computers.

These days it is very common to put TVs, computers etc into kids rooms. Is this a good thing? Does it help them to interact responsibly with others? Do they learn and develop as well as a child with varied, supported activities such as : drawing, reading, roleplay, going to the park?

All I am saying is there should be a balance. Computers - yes, TV - yes but in moderation and not used to simply give Mum and Dad some head space.

Personally I have taught my kids to use Word Processors, drawing packages and yes, even write programs. I don't like them spending hours on runescape or similar activies. They are allowed to play runescape and even play games that are rated at a little higher age than they actually are, but in moderation and if we parents approve.

Incidentally, our kids share a computer and don't have one each. This means they often co-operate and have to negotiate turns, share the experience etc and the computer is in a communal area and not in a bedroom.

As a parent, I am trying to give my kids the best start I can. Left to their own devices they would spend all day on the computer or watching Cartoon Network. We can tell when they have spent too long on such activities. They get lethargic, grumpy, don't eat well and sleep badly. However, with the right balance of activities and interaction the reverse is true.

Therefore, I give you, my opinion, my experience a smattering of professional opinion. However, if you want more science, there is plenty to hand if you Google (and Google Scholar). There has been a lot of research done in this area.

Comment Re:Oh, get over yourself (Score 2, Insightful) 556

No two year old should have a computer thrust on them. Any sub-five year old needs to develop cognitive and communicative skills. What they really need is the attention and interaction with another human being

When my kids were small, I did indeed sit them on my knee and let them "play" with the computer. The point being I was there; discussing, helping and guiding them.

Personally, I can't think of anything worse than leaving a small child to their own devices interacting with a screen, be it computer or TV.

By all means introduce a child to a computer at an early age, but do it in small doses and together.

In my experience children love computers, but when you do manage to drag them off and do something together that actually prefer it. The difficulty is detaching them from the system in the first place.

Don't be in a rush to plug 'em in too much, too quickly!

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...