Comment Re:Where did this come from (Score 1) 201
Atlantis wasn't bad thanks to Dr McKay!
Agree, SG-1 was great fun, a classic, Atlantis was ok fun, Stargate Universe is boooooring. I blame BSG.
Atlantis wasn't bad thanks to Dr McKay!
Agree, SG-1 was great fun, a classic, Atlantis was ok fun, Stargate Universe is boooooring. I blame BSG.
Actually when it comes to press freedom, the US still looks better than most countries. In fact, even after 230 years of the US example, I don't know of any other governments whose core founding and/or legal principles include the explicit recognition of the citizenry's inalienable right to freedom of speech, it seems to genuinely be something exceptional. Oh sure, many governments have begrudgingly given a nod to what they see as "granting" of similar rights (and in fact even that much is due to the positive influence of the US historically) - but saying "OK, we grant you freedom of speech" is actually fundamentally vastly different to inalienable rights, which are not considered granted, but exist independent of government and cannot morally be taken away. Sure, in practice lawmakers pee on the constitution with abandon, as lawmakers will do, but I'll take the US any day. Trying to block citizens' practice of liberties such as free speech is something all governments do anyway, but only one government in the world at least formally recognizes this as wrong (and gives the citizens other rights, such as the 2nd amendment, in order to enforce the 1st amendment).
I'm definitely not saying it's perfect, or that we shouldn't strive for better. On the contrary, we should continually strive for better. We have to.
Press Freedom Index 2010: US at #20. With the Nordic countries, Netherlands and Switzerland at the top.
Just yesterday I wanted to download VLC media player. Top link on Bing: repackaged with junk seach engine and crapware newsletters. Top link on Google: the home site which linked to the sourceforge download. Of course Microsoft could be doing that on purpose for Open Source software...
What country are you in? It's really only US that have Bing yet (rebranding old Live Search in all the other countries to Bing without actually having the product is an amazing decision btw..) and a search for VLC on Bing US gives me a very useful and relevant top result. With direct links to download even for Mac and Ubuntu versions:
On one hand, Microsoft managed to produce an excellent product that's almost fully compatible with the latest standards. On the other hand, they're the same people who's responsible for summoning the Devil's own child into this world (under the trademark of IE6). I honestly don't know what to feel about them right now.
I'm curious, did you actually experience Netscape 6 (the alternative at the time) as something better?
Your comment doesn't really apply. Microsoft is the only company with enough balls to ignore certain aspects of Acid 3 that aren't official specifications of HTML/CSS/JS.
Mozilla also ignores SVG fonts, as they should (enter WOFF), but you are right in that they are not a company. They are both right, and both deserve kudos for standing up to the hysteria of artificial 100 score on Acid3.
If IE8 is any indication, Firefox comes a damn sight closer to passing.
Not perfectly in compliance, granted, but really rather close when compared to what it looked like in IE for me.
Firefox does 97, IE9 does 95 on Acid3.
This is eerily similar to Microsoft being praised for Windows 7 after pushing Vista. Sure the situation is completely different, but praising a company for finally listening to consumers is the wrong way to go about it.
You could argue that they didn't listen to consumers, or developers, but did it because they were under investigation for anti-competitive behavior on this, both in US and EU. A conviction on this would be tough on the image, even for Apple.
http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/
(when promoting being up to date, linking to an out of date version was a pretty ironic screw-up..
I seem to be missing something here. Somebody please remind me what Windows Malicious software remover and all those antivirus programs are supposed to be doing.
The biggest problem is people not using them - not using automatic windows update (or very frequently manual) and not having up-to date malware and antivirus (it's free and some, like this one, are not the resource hogs fx old Norton was infamous for.)
Nothing is 100% secure, but boy to this take care of most of it, as you correctly are saying (when I turn my sarcasm detector off
fx Windows had actually Conficker patched quite early, in Windows Update, it became the big ongoing epidemic because of unpatched machines (people not doing auto- or frequent updates, for some reason or other).
And some people are probably going to suggest Mac or Linux at this point, fair enough, but for people that wants or needs to use Windows, it isn't that hard to have a quite secure and trouble free Windows 7 setup (decade old XP is starting to be another story).
but they did have it in the notes. the article is wrong.
Uhm.. can you point to where you see that? Here are the notes: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4188
So why are cell phone cameras (still and video) so popular?
They aren't. From my experience, hardly anybody actually uses phone cameras, unless they are really desperate and have no alternative camera at hand.
I could say my experience is the complete opposite, which it is, but since both are just anecdotal it made me curious to find out if there are any data on this.
According to Flickr usage statistics iPhone is the most used camera on Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/cameras/
Just one datapoint, I know. But seems at the very least to disprove the hardly used by anybody theory. I would guess, but have no data, that the complete different experiences people have on this comes down to demographic differences (mobile markets and usage very different from country to country, and age group to age group, etc).
Myself I find I'm using my mobile camera more, they have gotten quite good, and regular camera less. But I could still agree with your claim it is just because I don't have another camera with me, because that is mostly true, I usually don't go around with a camera, but I absolutely always have my mobile with me (currently a HTC HD2, so not in the iPhone group myself)
We’ve been there before, and intermediate layers between the platform and the developer ultimately produces sub-standard apps and hinders the progress of the platform.” -- Apple
Is Apple actually calling iTunes for Windows for a sub-standard app? That perhaps should be banned from the platform? Apple themselves are using non-native API intermediate layers such as CoreFoundation and CoreGraphics in their implementation of iTunes for Windows.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.