Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Zynga , huh? (Score 1) 325

I worked in a slaughter house for a while (maintenance crew) and after I left it took three months to get the stink out of my skin. Taking on anyone from Zynga would mean having to retrain them completely to get rid of all the bad habits they learned. It'd be easier and cheaper to just take on a fresh graduate and start from scratch. Since my first comment appears to have vanished I'll restate it: working for Zynga will make you unemployable. Their stink will stick to you like the smell from a slaughter house. THE 12 DAYS OF ZYNGA CHRISTMAS!!! 12 blank screens 11 locked up links 10 games not working 9 days of screaming 8 posts not posting 7 emails bitching 6 times refreshing 5 salty tears 4 gifts missing 3 broken mice 2 therapists and a programmer hanging from a treeeeee !!

Comment Dear Zynga (Score 1) 200

Sucks to be you. Assholes! You deserve to fail. If I ever see a former Zynga coder or QA person come through my door looking for a job I WILL have you thrown off the premises bodily. Yours All the people you have ripped off, falsely accused of cheating with no proof and otherwise slandered.

Comment Re:Wow (Score 1) 585

Not necessarily. That would imply the car makers gave a rat's ass about the consumer once they part with their cash and that they cared about making a properly engineered product over making money. As an example, Porche invented series electric hybrid drive technology around 1908. Even then it was easier to drive, provided more and better controlled torque to the wheels when it was most needed and used substantially less fuel than a straight mechanical counterpart. They abandoned the technology because fuel cost about one cent a US gallon and mechanical cars were the "accepted" technology. They knew it was a better was of doing things but ignored it anyway. Car makers haven't changed a lot in the last hundred odd years.

Comment Without qualification I can guarantee (Score 1) 224

I will NEVER buy a game that requires me to be online the whole time to play a single player game and will consistently advise friends and family to do the same. Congratulations to the guy who starts a replay about World of Warcrack, I don't play that either! I wouldn't bother pirating a game with this level of DRM, either. I'd just go buy something else from a different production house that didn't treat legitimate buyers like criminals, or even an indie game.

Comment really (Score 1) 147

and this is soooo much worse than the malware authors who do this on closed source software ... how? Decompilers are readily available. The only thing they don't give you is the comments and annotations. If you're good enough to write decent malware then decompiling a closed source binary and inserting your payload really isn't an issue and people will trust what you put back into the wild because it's closed and "safe".

Comment How is this a problem? (Score 1, Informative) 916

If Evolutionists can't provide sufficient evidence to disprove the null hypothesis then why should should Evolutionism itself not be considered just as much a matter of faith as Intelligent Design? Arguing that the existence of a process proves the non-existence of the process engineer is no better than saying we were all created as we are in an instant. Neither argument carries any logical validity and can only be considered as statements of "faith".

Slashdot Top Deals

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...