Miksi naiset aina rakastuvat miehiin mustiin? Me halutaan olla neekereitä, halutaan olla

I want to know too.

He probably meant "If one has to google a term" rather than "you" as in the guy who wrote the post.

PENIS FOREVER!!! !!! !!!

It's not that easy on Linux. Often, keeping an older version of some program involves using a really out of date distro like Debian stable, compiling a bunch of crap yourself, or hoping that someone has decided to make binary packages for the old version that work on your distro.

If anyone's forcing anything on anyone, it's really GNOME 3 which is doing the forcing. This is what upset me the most about GNOME 3 - it seems you deliberately removed and hid a ton of configuration options that existed in GNOME 2. Why do you need to install an extra program to change the theme, the fonts, put back the minimise/maximise buttons, disable GUI animations, etc? Why is it no longer possible to specify a custom GUI colour scheme like it was in GNOME 2?
Why isn't the classic style interface easily available as an option? Well I suppose there's the 'fallback mode' which works like GNOME 2, but I heard that it was going to be 'deprecated' and removed at some point.

Great. How would you like me to come over to your house and innovate things for you? "I don't think you should have your TV here. It'd increase usability and look better over here. Alright, btw we're going to paint all your walls white because that's how Apple does it. Looks nice right? Of course it does. Oh this toaster is awful, it has far too many buttons. Better replace that right away"

You probably aren't even going to read this anyway. But whatever. Sorry if this is inflammatory, it's just that I used GNOME 2 for six years and really liked it. It had some problems but it was good. I felt like GNOME 3 took everything I liked and threw it away, and at the same time tried to force everything I hated on me.

How long ago was this, 2004?

And because all the programmers are now using core i7s with 20GB RAM, you will find it painful to run even a modern web browser on the fastest computer from 10 years ago.

In other words... "dammit ACs never post anything of value that's worth reading ... except for all those times that they do. Shit, why won't the whole world help me pretend this never ever happens?!" Fucking people, not doing exactly what you'd like them to do with their own personal preferences. The nerve! By the way your sig is hilariously ironic. ACs contributing useful posts at least once in a while is a "shade of gray" you don't seem to recognize. Maybe a logged-in user will reply to this and quote it so you can see the hypocrisy. Would that interfere with your cozy black-and-white world of "AC bad, pseudonym good"? Ah heck yeah man benis denis.

PENIS

A bunch of addons get broken and the interface gets changed.

Get back to work, Larry.

Heh heh. Mike BabCOCK. COCK.

Using "um" is really condescending, please don't do it.

That didn't stop them from killing all web browser competition for a stretch of several years. By the time any action was taken against them for their anticompetitive, Netscape had already been killed and IE had something like 90%+ marketshare, and things stayed that way until Firefox started becoming popular. And they were barely just given a slap on the wrist for it all.

whose

hah hah yes, and then they'll kill your ass by making Wayland the standard. You won't be able to write your own window manager and etc etc.