You mean like the U.S.'s domestic oil production that Bush couldn't pursue because environmentalists couldn't bear the impact it would have on their cause?
Oh wait, somehow it's OK now because their own guy is in office?
If you were paying attention, these Environmental Strawmen you are railing against are just as pissed at th e current occupant as they were at President Cheney.
Am I the only one who read this initially thinking that "supercharger" meant a pump that forces compressed air into an internal combustion engine?
Not my choice, we got them in a deal with a VC. And I will tell you from experience that they're not all great programmers. A *few* of them were very good programmers, most of them were OK, and a few were very *bad* programmers. Just like everyone else. The idea that the H1B program just brings in technical giants is pure fantasy. This isn't 1980; if a CS genius living in Bangalore wants to work he doesn't have to come to the US anymore, there are good opportunities for him at home..
H1B brings in a cross section of inexperienced programmers and kicks them out of the country once they've gained some experience. I have nothing against bringing more foreign talent into the US, but it should be with an eye to encouraging permanent residency. I think if you sponsor an H1B and he goes home, you should have to wait a couple years before you replace him. Then companies will be pickier about who they bring over.
I have to say, managing a team of H1Bs was very rewarding, not necessarily from a technical standpoint but from a cultural standpoint. Because I had to learn about each programmer on my team and the way things are done in his culture, I think I became closer to a lot of them than I would have to a team of Americans.
Oh wait......
THen we'd have to pay them what they are worth, and not rely on the indentured servant system.......
Beautiful example of anecdotal evidence. No one has ever said there is no such thing as an abusive cop.
Beautiful example of completely discarding a simple provision of evidence as asked for, then trying to change the argument.
Correction
1: Find out what the Democrats want to do
2: Do the same
Well, yeah, but not before denouncing it.
I'm looking forward to printing all the fantasy chess pieces I couldn't afford in the game shop when I was lee lad.
You were the layer of yeast on the bottom of unfiltered beer bottles?
You can heat your house with two tea candles and a couple clay flower pots:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Perpetual motion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
There is a lot more. These guys and gals have us to the point of completely free energy.
But while the communist cabal of evil "real" scientists are all busy trying to shackle the world with their hoohaw global warming money and freedom grab when they aren't out killing puppies, and figuring out ways to break Jerry Sandusky out of jail - the true inventors working tirelessly in their garages have solved all our energy problems
WAKE UP AMERICA! from a cave in Idaho, where men are still men, and the sheep are pretty nervous
Instead of calling the device a smartphone equipped with a 50 MP camera, they can market it as a 50 MP camera which is 4G/5G/6G enabled, plus it can make phone calls too
The only way Kodak can really make a difference in the already crowded smartphone market is to equip the Kodak branded smartphone with its own 50 Megapixel CCD sensor
If Kodak can do that then it has a fighting chance
If Kodak can't, hey, it won't be that much difference from yet-another-reference-design smartphone, aka, the " white-box "
Neutrinos have bad breadth.