You are an idiot that does not understand why Ma Bell was not innovative or what the court actually told the FCC when it over-turned the rules...you certainly do not understand the crap political game the ISPs have been playing with the FCC regarding when they do and do not want to be considered a common carrier.

EOs are completely legal and have been used since the creation of the union. Reagan used then, Bush I used them, Clinton used them, Bush II used them....name a president that did not use an Executive Order please.

Idiots.

It has not cleared it's orbit of debris and Eris is in the same boat yet LARGER than Pluto.... how is Pluto a planet then?

Or maybe just an agency under the supervision of a department....but both would require an act of congress. It is the only way to get authority under a CIO position that can affect the entire government through policy...Frankly it should be done from a security aspect alone.

The fact that consumer ISPs are access providers means they will never meet the definition for free peering agreements. They are all consumption services. Asshats can't seem to get it that these companies are just trying to set up a two-sided market and that is the only reason any of this is an issue.

No...Neither wanted a free peering agreement. BOTH were willing to PAY for the install of the hardware and the maintinance of that hardware in the Comcast Colo. Comcast said no. That is the fact.

I think your comprehension of the issue is the problem. Not my reading comprehension.

Comcast has their cable monopoly that allows them to use the poles as part of the contact with the cities they are in. They use this as a means to prevent competition through graft and exclusive contracts...Title II would prevent cities from blocking right of way access to competition like Google.

umm... No they aren't. Comcast and Verizon sent all the Netflix traffic through a single switch to their networks and held Netflix hostage for the deal that Verizon and Comcast wanted to make rather than allowing Netflix to just buy the equipment and pay for maintenance....Level 3 has had the same problems with Verizon and Comcast.

Netflix already pays for access to the internet....The internet has never been a two-sided market where services have to pay for access to people that want to use them. Comcast et al is attempting to do that and that is what people are complaining about.

1) get a cloud print capable printer
2) set up a standard windows/Linux machine to run the cloud print service and publish a standard printer to that service....then you just share the printer to him (this is what I did)

Not that I agree with the person you are replying to but...try citing your claims asshole.

you are assuming cities use science to set speed limits.

like those 6 lane boulevards that have a sped limit of 35.....WTF!

you mean like on freeways where most people go over the limit and accidents are caused more by jackasses that drive erratically rather than people going with the flow of the traffic speed.